Augmented reality: Hard problems of law and policy

UbiComp 2014 - Adjunct Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1283-1288

  Roesner, Franziska ^a   Denning, Tamara ^a   Newell, Bryce Clayton ^b   Kohno, Tadayoshi ^a   Calo, Ryan ^b  

^a University of Washington   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Law; Policy; Privacy; Usability

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; PUBLIC POLICY; UBIQUITOUS COMPUTING;

FREE SPEECH; HARD PROBLEMS; INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH; LAW; USABILITY;

AUGMENTED REALITY;

EID: 84908682228     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2638728.2641709     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Apple. Apparatus and methods for enforcement of policies upon a wireless device. U.S. Patent 8254902 (filed 2008).
2. Calo, R. When Apps Attack. In Forbes.com (November 17, 2013).
3. Deng, J., Krause, J., and Fei-Fei, L. Fine-Grained Crowdsourcing for Fine-Grained Recognition. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2013).
4. Epson Moverio. http://www.epson.com/cgibin/Store/jsp/Landing/moverio-bt-200-smartglasses.do
5. Glik v. Cunniffe, 655 F.3d 78 (1st Cir. 2011).
6. Google Glass. https://glass.google.com/
7. Gupta, S., Morris, D., Patel S.N., Tan, D. Airwave: Non-Contact Haptic Feedback Using Air Vortex Rings. In ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (2013).
8. Layar. https://www.layar.com/
9. Meta SpaceGlasses. https://spaceglasses.com/
10. QuestVisual: WordLens. http://questvisual.com/
11. Smith v. Maryland, 442 U.S. 735 (1979).
12. United States v. Jones, 132 S.Ct. 945 (2012).