Thin-film composite membranes formed by interfacial polymerization with natural material sericin and trimesoyl chloride for nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 471, Issue , 2014, Pages 381-391

  Zhou, Choumou ^a   Shi, Yalan ^a   Sun, Changsheng ^a   Yu, Sanchuan ^a   Liu, Meihong ^a   Gao, Congjie ^b  

^a ZHEJIANG SCI TECH UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Development Center of Water Treatment Technology   (China)

Author keywords

Interfacial polymerization; Nanofiltration; Sericin; Thin film composite membrane; Trimesoyl chloride (TMC)

Indexed keywords

INTERFACIAL POLYMERIZATION; NATURAL MATERIALS; SERICIN; THIN-FILM COMPOSITE MEMBRANE; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE;

NANOFILTRATION;

DYE; ELECTROLYTE; MAGNESIUM CHLORIDE; POLYMER; POLYSULFONE; SERICIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM SULFATE; TRIMESOYL CHLORIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); FILM; ISOELECTRIC POINT; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; MORPHOLOGY; NANOFABRICATION; NANOFILTRATION; PH; POLYMERIZATION; REACTION TIME; SOLUTE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; TIME; WATER PERMEABILITY; ZETA POTENTIAL;

EID: 84908670144     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: 18733123     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2014.08.033     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Raman L.P., Cheryan M., Rajagopalan N. Consider nanofiltration for membrane separations. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1994, 90:68-74.
2. Mulder M. Basic Principles of Membrane Technology 2003, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
3. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., Waite T.D. Nanofiltration - Principles and Applications 2005, Elsevier, New York.
4. Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., Gestel T.V., Doyenb W., Leysen R. A review of pressure-driven membrane processes in wastewater treatment and drinking water production. Environ. Prog. 2003, 22:46-56.
5. Shannon M.A., Bohn P.W., Elimelech M., Georgiadis J.G., Marinas B.J., Mayes A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452:301-310.
6. Al-Rashdi B.A.M., Johnson D.J., Hilal N. Removal of heavy metal ions by nanofiltration. Desalination 2013, 315:2-17.
7. Abels C., Carstensen F., Wessling M. Membrane processes in biorefinery applications. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 444:285-317.
8. Yüksel S., Kabay N., Yüksel M. Removal of bisphenol A (BPA) from water by various nanofiltration (NF) and reverse osmosis (RO) membranes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2013, 263:307-310.
9. Baker R.W. Membrane Technology and Applications 2004, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester. second ed.
10. J.E. Cadotte, M.J. Steuck, R.J. Petersen, Research on In-situ-formed Condensation Polymers for Reverse Osmosis Membranes, NTIS Report No. PB-288387, 1978.
11. Peterson R.J. Composite reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1993, 83:81-150.
12. Abu Seman M.N., Khayet M., Hilal N. Nanofiltration thin-film composite polyester polyethersulfone-based membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 348:109.
13. Xie W., Geise G.M., Freeman B.D., Lee H.S., Byun G, McGrath J.E. Polyamide interfacial composite membranes prepared from m-phenylene diamine, trimesoyl chloride and a new disulfonated diamine. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 403-404:152-161.
14. An Q.-F., Sun W.-D., Zhao Q., Ji Y.-L., Gao C.-J. Study on a novel nanofiltration membrane prepared by interfacial polymerization with zwitterionic amine monomers. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 431:171-179.
15. Wang T., Yang Y., Zheng J., Zhang Q., Zhang S. A novel highly permeable positively charged nanofiltration membrane based on a nanoporous hyper-crosslinked polyamide barrier layer. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 448:180-189.
16. Li Y., Su Y., Dong Y., Zhao X., Jiang Z., Zhang R., Zhao J. Separation performance of thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane through interfacial polymerization using different amine monomers. Desalination 2014, 333:59-65.
17. Sun S.P., Hatton T.A., Chung T.S. Hyperbranched polyethyleneimine induced cross-linking of polyamide-imide nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for effective removal of ciprofloxacin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45:4003-4009.
18. Li L., Wang B., Tan H., Chen T., Xu J. A novel nanofiltration membrane prepared with PAMAM and TMC by in situ interfacial polymerization on PEK-C ultrafiltration membrane. J. Membr. Sci. 2006, 269:84-93.
19. Xu X.-X., Zhou C.-L., Zeng B.-R., Xia H.-P., Lan W.-G., He X.-M. Structure and properties of polyamidoamine/polyacrylonitrile composite nanofiltration membrane prepared by interfacial polymerization. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2012, 96:229-236.
20. Chiang Y., Hsub Y., Ruaan R., Chuang C., Tung K. Nanofiltration membranes synthesized from hyperbranched polyethyleneimine. J. Membr. Sci. 2009, 326:19-26.
21. Sun S.P., Hatton T.A., Chan S.Y., Chung T.S. Novel thin-film composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes with double repulsion for effective removal of emerging organic matters from water. J. Membr. Sci. 2012, 401:152-162.
22. Fang W., Shi L., Wang R. Interfacially polymerized composite nanofiltration hollow fiber membranes for low-pressure water softening. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 430:129-139.
23. Zhang Y., Su Y., Peng J., Zhao X., Liu J., Zhao J., Jiang Z. Composite nanofiltration membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization with natural material tannic acid and trimesoyl chloride. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 429:235-242.
24. Wei X., Kong X., Yang J., Zhang G., Chen J., Wang J. Structure influence of hyperbranched polyester on structure and properties of synthesized nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2013, 440:67-76.
25. Lewin M., Pearce E. Handbook of Fiber Chemistry 1998, 415-464. Marcel Dekker, New York. second edition.
26. Hirose M., Hiroki I., Yoshiyasu K. Effect of skin layer surface structures on the flux behavior of RO membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 121:209-215.
27. Childress A.E., Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 1996, 119:253-268.
28. Sabde A.D., Trivedi M.K., Ramachandhran V., Hanra M.S., Misra B.M. Casting and characterization of cellulose acetate butyrate based UF membranes. Desalination 1997, 114:223-232.
29. Ahmad A.L., Ooi B.S. Properties-performance of thin-film composites membrane: study on trimesoyl chloride content and polymerization time. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 255:67-77.
30. Ghosh A.K., Jeong B.-H., Huang X., Hoek E.M.V. Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 311:34-45.
31. Morgan P.W., Kwolek S.L. Interfacial polycondensation 2. Fundamentals of polymer formation at liquid interfaces. J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem. 1996, 34:531-559.
32. Socrates G. Infrared Characteristic Group Frequencies 1994, Wiley Interscience, Chichester.
33. Hoek E.M.V., Bhattacharjee S., Elimelech M. Effect of membrane surface roughness on colloid-membrane DLVO interactions. Langmuir 2003, 19:4836-4847.
34. Morgan P.W. Interfacial polymerization without stirring. Condensation Polymers: by Interfacial and Solution Methods 1965, 19-64. Interscience Publishers, New York, NY, (Chapter 2).
35. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. A method for characterizing membranes during nanofiltration at extreme pH. J. Membr. Sci. 2010, 363:188-194.
36. Dalwani M., Benes N.E., Bargeman G., Stamatialis D., Wessling M. Effect of pH on the performance of polyamide/polyacrylonitrile based thin film composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 2011, 372:228-238.
37. Yang Q., Chung T.-S., Santoso Y.E. Tailoring pore size and pore size distribution of kidney dialysis hollow fiber membranes via dual-bath coagulation approach. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 290:153-163.
38. Schaep J., Van der Bruggen B., Vandecasteele C., Wilms D. Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration. Sep. Purif. Technol. 1998, 14:155-162.
39. Peeters J.M.M., Boom J.P., Mulder M.H.V., Strathmann H. Retention measurements of nanofiltration membranes with electrolyte solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 1998, 145:199-209.
40. Van der Bruggen B., Schaep J., Wilms D., Vandecasteele C. Influence of molecular size, polarity and charge on the retention of organic molecules by nanofiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 1999, 156:29-41.
41. Wang N., Ji S., Zhang G., Li J., Wang L. Self-assembly of graphene oxide and polyelectrolyte complex nanohybrid membranes for nanofiltration and pervaporation. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 213:318-329.
42. Van der Bruggen B., Mänttäri M., Nyström M. Drawbacks of applying nanofiltration and how to avoid them: a review. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 63:251-263.
43. Al-Amoudi A., Lovitt R.W. Fouling strategies and the cleaning system of NF membranes and factors affecting cleaning efficiency. J. Membr. Sci. 2007, 303:4-28.