The distinction between privacy and data protection in the jurisprudence of the CJEU and the ECtHR

International Data Privacy Law

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 222-228

  Kokott, Juliane ^a   Sobotta, Christoph ^a  

^a European Union   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908657937     PISSN: 20443994     EISSN: 20444001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/idpl/ipt017     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. CJEU, Case C-28/08 P Commission/Bavarian Lager [2010] ECR I-6055, para. 60.
2. See the Final report to the CDDH on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 5 April 2013 (47 þ 1[2013]008),,http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/ standardsetting/hrpolicy/Accession/Meeting_reports/47_1%282013% 29008rev2_EN.pdf. accessed 16 August 2013.
3. CJEU, Joined Cases C-402/05 P and C-415/05 P Kadi and Al Barakaat International Foundation v Council and Commission, [2008] ECR I-6351, para. 285.
4. See Juliane Kokott and Christoph Sobotta, 'The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union after Lisbon' (2012) 5 Revista romana de drept european (RRDE)-The Romanian Journal of European Law 93
5. and for an earlier draft, AEL Working Paper 2010/06,,http://cadmus.eui.eu/ bitstream/handle/1814/15208/AEL_WP_2010_06.pdf?sequence=3., accessed 16 August 2013.
6. CJEU, Cases C-238/99 P, C-244/99 P, C-245/99 P, C-247/99 P, C-250/99 P to C-252/99 P and C-254/99 P Limburgse Vinyl Maatschappij and others v Commission [2002] ECR I-8375, para. 274
7. and Case C-301/04 P Commission v SGL Carbon [2006] ECR I-5915, para. 43.
8. CJEU, Case 136/79 National Panasonic v Commission [1980] ECR 2033, paras 17 et seq.
9. and Case C-62/90 Commission v Germany [1992] ECR I-2575, para. 23.
10. See, eg, ECtHR, Amann v Switzerland, no. 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, para. 65
11. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, para. 52.
12. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data [1995] OJ L281/31 (Data Protection Directive).
13. ECtHR, Amann v Switzerland App no 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, para. 65; Rotaru v Romania App no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, para. 43.
14. ECtHR, Rotaru v Romania App no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, para. 44.
15. Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden App no 62332/00, ECHR 2006-VII, para. 72.
16. ECtHR, M.M. v UK App no. 24029/07 (13 November 2012), para. 188.
17. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, para. 58
18. and Joined Cases C-465/00, C-138/01, and C-139/01 Österreichischer Rundfunk and Others [2003] ECR I-4989, paras 73 and 74.
19. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, para. 59.
20. EctHR, Amann v Switzerland App no 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, paras 69 f. and 80;
21. Rotaru v Romania App no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, para. 46.
22. ECtHR, Amann v Switzerland App no 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, para. 76.
23. ECtHR, Rotaru v Romania App no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, paras 57 ff.;
24. Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden App no 62332/00, ECHR 2006-VII, paras 76 ff.;
25. M.M. v UK App no. 24029/07 (13 November 2012), paras 195 ff.
26. ECtHR, M.M. v UK App no. 24029/07 (13 November 2012), para. 200.
27. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, paras 67-71.
28. Cf. ECtHR, Kenedi v Hungary App no 31475/05 (26 May 2009), para. 43;
29. and Shapovalov v Ukraine App no 45835/05 (31 July 2012), § 68.
30. ECtHR, Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden App no 62332/00, ECHR 2006-VII, para. 88.
31. ECtHR, Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden App no 62332/00, ECHR 2006-VII, para. 90.
32. ECtHR, Segerstedt-Wiberg and Others v Sweden App no 62332/00, ECHR 2006-VII, para. 91.
33. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, paras 79-83.
34. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, paras 52, 53, and 87.
35. ECtHR, Bernh Larsen Holding AS and others v Norway App no 24117/08 (14 March 2013), para. 159.
36. Cf. CJEU, Case C-400/10 PPU McB. [2010] ECR I-8965, paras 51 et seq.
37. and Case C-282/10 Dominguez, not yet reported Opinion of AG Trstenjak, paras 80-83.
38. For a first assessment in this regard see CJEU, Case C-73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi et Satamedia [2008] ECR I-9831, Opinion of AG Kokott, paras 102-104.
39. Eg, ECtHR, K.U. v Finland App no 2872/02, ECHR 2008, paras 42 f.;
40. Ageyevy v Russia App no 7075/10 (18 April 2013), paras 194 f.
41. Cf. ECtHR, von Hannover v Germany App no 59320/00, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 2004-VI, para. 70.
42. CJEU, Case C-73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi et Satamedia [2008] ECR I-9831, Opinion of AG Kokott, para. 41.
43. CJEU, Case C-275/06 Promusicae [2008] ECR I-271, paras 63 ff.
44. Johannes Masing, 'Herausforderungen des Datenschutzes' [2012] Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2305, 2306 ff.;
45. Dieter Grimm, 'Der Datenschutz vor einer Neuorientierung' [2013] Juristenzeitung, 585.
46. CJEU, Joined Cases C-92/09 and C-93/09 Volker und Markus Schecke and Eifert [2010] ECR I-11063, para. 49.
47. ECtHR, Amann v Switzerland App no 27798/95, ECHR 2000-II, paras 69
48. and 80; Rotaru v Romania App no 28341/95, ECHR 2000-V, para. 46.
49. ECtHR, M.M. v UK App no. 24029/07 (13 November 2012), para. 200.
50. CJEU, Case C-473/12 IPI [2013] OJ C26/20.
51. CJEU, Case C-518/07 Commission v Germany [2010] ECR I-1885 and Case C-614/10 Commission v Austria, not yet reported.
52. ,http://googlepolicyeurope.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/judging-freedom-of-expression-at.html. accessed 16 August 2013.
53. 46, http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/26/us-eu-google-dataprotectionidUSBRE91P0A320130226. accessed 16 August 2013.
54. Cf. ECtHR, Ageyevy v Russia App no 7075/10 (18 April 2013), para. 193.
55. Cf. ECtHR, Biriuk v Lithuania App no 23373/03 (25 November 2008) paras 35 ff;
56. P. and S. v Poland App no 57375/08 (30 October 2012), § 43.
57. On blocking Google, see,https://support.google.com/webmasters/ answer/156449?hl=en&ref_topic=1724262. accessed 16 August 2013.
58. Cf. Commission, 'Analysis and impact study on the implementation of Directive EC 95/46 in Member States', accompanying the 'First Report on the implementation of the Data Protection Directive (95/46/EC)' COM (2003) 265 final, p. 17 et seq. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/privacy/ docs/lawreport/consultation/technical-annex_en.pdf. accessed 16 August 2013.
59. On the interpretation of Art. 9 see CJEU, Case C-73/07 Satakunnan Markkinapörssi et Satamedia [2008] ECR I-9831, Opinion of AG Kokott, paras 55 et seq.