The Trajectory approach for AFDX FIFO networks revisited and corrected

RTCSA 2014 - 20th IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Real-Time Computing Systems and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages

  Li, Xiaoting ^a   Cros, Olivier ^b   George, Laurent ^a  

^a Ecole Centrale Electroniques   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS; ETHERNET; TRAJECTORIES;

COMPETING FLOW; END TO END DELAY; STATE OF THE ART; TIME INTERVAL; TRAJECTORY ANALYSIS; TRAJECTORY APPROACH; UPPER BOUND; WORST-CASE DELAY ANALYSIS;

REAL TIME SYSTEMS;

EID: 84908637350     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/RTCSA.2014.6910523     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. P. R.Santos, A.Vieira, "Flexible, efficient and robust real-time communication with server-based Ethernet switching," Int. Workshop on Factory Communication Systems (WFCS), pp. 131-140, 2010.
2. ARINC 664, ACCE Std. 664, 2002-2008.
3. W. Steiner and G. Bauer, "Ttethernet dataflow concept," Network Computing and Applications, 2009. NCA 2009., pp. 319-322, 2009.
4. S. Martin, P. Minet, and L. George, "End-to-end response time with fixed priority scheduling: Trajectory approach versus holistic approach," International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 37-56, 2005.
5. J. Gutiérrez, J. Palencia, and M. Harbour, "Holistic schedulability analysis for multipacket messages in AFDX networks," Real-Time Systems, pp. 1-40, 2013.
6. J.-Y. L. Boudec, "Application of network calculus to guaranteed service networks," IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 1087-1096, May 1998.
7. J.-P. Georges, E. Rondeau, and T. Divoux, "Evaluation of switched Ethernet in an industrial context by using the network calculus," in Proc. of Int. Workshop on Factory Communication Systems(WFCS). Vasteras, Sweden: IEEE, Aug. 2002, pp. 19-26.
8. H. Bauer, J.-L. Scharbarg, and C. Fraboul, "Improving the worst-case delay analysis of an AFDX network using an optimized Trajectory approach," IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 521-533, 2010.
9. S. Martin and P. Minet, "Schedulability analysis of flows scheduled with FIFO: application to the expedited forwarding class," in Proc. of Int. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium (IPDPS). Rhodes Island, Greece: IEEE, Apr. 2006, pp. 8-pp.
10. S. Martin and P. Minet, "Worst case end-to-end response times of flows scheduled with FP/FIFO," in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Networking, Mauritius, Apr. 2006, pp. 54-60.
11. S. Martin, P. Minet, and L. George, "The Trajectory approach for the end-to-end response times with non-preemptive FP/EDF," in Software Engineering Research and Applications. Springer, 2006, pp. 229-247.
12. X. Li, J.-L. Scharbarg, and C. Fraboul, "Analysis of the pessimism of the Trajectory approach for upper bounding end-to-end delay of sporadic flows sharing a switched Ethernet network," in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Real-Time and Network and Systems (RTNS), Nantes, France, Sep. 2011.
13. H. Bauer, J.-L. Scharbarg, and C. Fraboul, "Applying and optimizing trajectory approach for performance evaluation of AFDX avionics network," in Proc. of Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). Marllorca, Spain: IEEE, Sep. 2009, pp. 1-8.
14. G. Kemayo, F. Ridouard, H. Bauer, and P. Richard, "Optimistic problem in the trajectory approach in FIFO context," in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA). IEEE, Sep. 2013, pp. 1-8.
15. G. Kemayo, F. Ridouard, H. Bauer, and P. Richard, "Optimism due to serialization in the trajectory approach for switched Ethernet networks," in Proc. of Int. Conf. on Junior Researcher Workshop on Real-Time Computing (JRWRTC), Sophia Antipolis, France, Oct. 2013, pp. 13-16.