Regional landscape mapping through a method of chain standardization of landsat images

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 134, Issue , 2015, Pages 1-9

  Meng, Qingmin ^a  

^a MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Imagery chain standardization; Land cover mapping; Linear regression; Regional landscape analysis; Support vector machine classifier

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL ROBOTS; AGRICULTURE; LINEAR REGRESSION; MAPPING; STANDARDIZATION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION;

ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTIONS; CLASSIFICATION PERFORMANCE; IMAGE NORMALIZATION; LAND COVER ANALYSIS; LAND COVER MAPPING; REGIONAL LANDSCAPES; SIMPLE LINEAR REGRESSION; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE CLASSIFIERS;

IMAGE ANALYSIS;

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION; LAND COVER; LANDSAT; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; NEAREST NEIGHBOR ANALYSIS; RADIOMETRIC SURVEY; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE IMAGERY; STANDARDIZATION;

ARKANSAS; LOUISIANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84908593291     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson J.R., Hardy E.E., Roach J.T., Witmer R.E. A land use and land cover classification system for use with remote sensor data. 1976, Geological Survey Profession 964 in U.S. Geological Survey Circular 671, 〈http://landcover.usgs.gov/pdf/anderson.pdf〉 (accessed on January 27th, 2014).
2. Campbell J.B. Introduction to remote sensing 1997, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
3. Canty M.J., Nielsen A.A., Schmidt M. Automatic radiometric normalization of multitemporal satellite imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment 2003, 91:441-451.
4. CAST (Center for Advanced Spatial Technologies). 2007. Final Reprot: 2006 Arkansas Land Use and Land Cover. Report prepared by Bruce E. Gorham and Jason A. Tullis. University of Arkansas. http://cast.uark.edu/assets/files/PDF/technical-report_lulc-2006.pdf. Accessed on 01/23/2014.
5. Cihlar J. Land-cover mapping of large areas from satellites: Status and research priorities. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2000, 21:1093-1114.
6. Cihlar J., Xia Q.H., Chen J., Beaubien J., Fung K., Latifovic R. Classification by progressive generalization: A new automated methodology for remote sensing multichannel data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 1998, 19:2685-2704.
7. Cohen W.B., Goward S.N. Landsat's role in ecological applications of remote sensing. Bioscience 2004, 54:535-545.
8. Cohen W.B., Maiersperger T.K., Spies T.A., Oetter D.R. Modelling forest cover attributes as continuous variables in a regional context with Thematic Mapper data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2001, 22:2279-2310.
9. Congalton R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 37:35-46.
10. Coppin R., Bauer M.E. Processing of multitemporal Landsat TM imagery to optimize extraction of forest cover change features. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing 1994, 32:918-927.
11. Cortes C., Vapnik V. Support-vector network. Machine Learning 1995, 20:1-25.
12. Du Y., Cihlar J., Beaubien J., Latifovic R. Radiometric normalization, compositing, and quality control for satellite high resolution image mosaics over large areas. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 2001, 39:623-634.
13. Elvidge C.D., Yuan D., Weerackoon R.D., Lunetta R.S. Relative radiaometric normalization of Landsat Multispectral Scanner data using an automatic scattergram controlled regression. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing 1995, 61(10):1255-1260.
14. Foody G.M. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment 2002, 80:185-201.
15. Groom G., Mucher C.A., Ihse M., Wrbka T. Remote sensing in landscape ecology: Experiences and perspectives in a European context. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:391-408.
16. Gualtieri J.A., Cromp R.F. Support vector machines for hyperspectral remote sensing classification. Proceedings of the 27th AIPR workshop: advances in computer assisted recognition, Washington, DC, Oct. 27, 1998 1998, 221-232. SPIE.
17. Guindon B. Assessing the radiometric fidelity of high resolution satellite image mosaics. Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 1997, 52:229-243.
18. Hall F.G., Strebel D.E., Nickeson J.E., Goetz S.J. Radiometric rectification: Toward a common radiometric response among multidate, multisensor images. Remote Sensing of Environment 1991, 35:11-27.
19. Huang C., Davis L.S., Townshend J.R.D. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2002, 23(4):725-749.
20. Jensen J.R. Introductory digital image processing: A remote sensing perspective 1996, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
21. Junior O.A.C., Guimaraes R.F., Silva N.C., Gillespire A.R., Goemes R.A.T., Silva C.R., et al. Radiometric normalization of temporal images combining automatic detection of pseudo-invariant features from the distance and similarity spectral measures, density scatterplot analysis, and robust regression. Remote Sensing 2013, 5:2736-2794.
22. Knorn J., Rabe A., Radeloff V.C., Kuemmerle T., Kozak J., Hostert P. Land cover mapping of large areas using chain classification of neighboring Landsat satellite images. Remote Sensing of Environment 2009, 113:957-964.
23. Moran M.S., Jackson R.D., Slater P.N., Teillet P.M. Evaluation of simplifed procedures for retrieval of land surface reflectance factors from satellite sensor output. Remote Sensing of Environment 1992, 41:160-184.
24. NASA [National Aeronautic Space Administration] Landsat 8 mission updates 2013, [Online]. Available from 〈http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/landsat/main/index.html〉 (Accessed September 23rd, 2013).
25. Nasset E. Assessing sensor effects and effects of leaf-off and leaf-on canopy conditions on biophysical stand properties derived from small-footprint airborne laser data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 98:356-370.
26. O'Hara C., King J.S., Cartwright J.H., King R. Multitemporal land use and land cover classification of urbanized areas within sensitive coastal environments. IEEE Transactions on Geosciences and Remote Sensing 2003, 41:2005-2014.
27. Olthof I., Butson C., Fraser R. Signature extension through space for northern landcover classification: A comparison of radiometric correction methods. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 95:290-302.
28. Paolini L., Grings F., Sobrino J.A., Jimenez Munoz J.C., Karszenbaum H. Radiometric correction effects in Landsat multi-date/multi-sensor change detection studies. International Journal of Remote Sensing 2006, 27(4):685-704.
29. Parmenter A.P., Hansen A., Kennedy R., Cohen W., Langner U., Lawrence R., et al. Land use and land cover change in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem: 1975-1995. Ecological Applications 2003, 13:687-703.
30. Pax-Lenney M., Woodcock C.E., Macomber S.A., Gopal S., Song C. Forest mapping with a generalized classifier and Landsat TM data. Remote Sensing of Environment 2001, 77:241-250.
31. Riitters K.H., Wickham J.D., O'Neill R.V., Jones K.B., Smith E.R., Coulston J.W., et al. Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems 2002, 5:815-822.
32. Schott J.R., Salvaggio C., Vochok W.J. Radiometric scene normalization using pseudo-invariant features. Remote Sensing of Environment 1988, 26:1-16.
33. Song C., Woodcock C.E., Seto K.C., Lenney M.P., Macomber S.A. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects?. Remote Sensing of Environment 2001, 75:230-244.
34. Steele B.M. Maximum posterior probability estimators of map accuracy. Remote Sensing of Environment 2005, 99:254-270.
35. Wang Y., Moskovits D.K. Tracking fragmentation of natural communities and changes in land cover: Applications of Landsat data for conservation in an urban landscape (Chicago Wilderness). Conservation Biology 2001, 15(4):835-843.
36. Welch R., Madden M., Jordan T. Photogrammetric and GIS techniques for the development of vegetation database of mountainous areas: Great Smoky Mountains National Park. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 2002, 55:53-68.
37. Wulder M.A., White J.C., Goward S.N., Masek J.G., Irons J.R., Herold M., et al. Landsat continuity: Issues and opportunities for land cover monitoring. Remote Sensing of Environment 2008, 112:955-969.