Design and field testing of a system for remote monitoring of sea turtle nests

MobileHCI 2014 - Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 637-642

  Zimmerman, Thomas G ^a   Wantman, Samuel ^b   Muiznieks, Britta ^c   Browning, Lou ^d   Kaplan, Eric ^e   Frey, Eric ^d  

^a IBM ALMADEN RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b NerdsWithoutBorders   (United States)

^c NATIONAL PARK SERVICE   (United States)

^d Wildlife Rehabilitation   (United States)

^e Hatteras Island Ocean Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Data acquisition; Monitoring biological systems; Remote monitoring; Sensors; Wireless

Indexed keywords

BEACHES; CONSERVATION; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA HANDLING; DESIGN; ELECTRIC POWER SUPPLIES TO APPARATUS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; LOW POWER ELECTRONICS; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; RADIO; REMOTE CONTROL; SENSORS; WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORKS;

DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM; ENDANGERED SPECIES; HARSH ENVIRONMENT; HATCHING ACTIVITY; PROTECTIVE BARRIER; REMOTE MONITORING; THREE AXIS ACCELEROMETERS; WIRELESS NETWORKING;

MONITORING;

EID: 84908583731     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2628363.2628432     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. Banerjee, N., Corner, M., Levine, B. Design and field experimentation of an energy-efficient architecture for DTN throwboxes. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking archive, Vol 18 Issue 2 (2010), 554-567
2. Eisenman, S.B., Miluzzo, E., Lane, N.D., Peterson, R.A., Ahn, G.-S. and Campbell, A.T. The BikeNet Mobile Sensing System for Cyclist Experience Mapping. Proc. SenSys ACM Press (2007), 87-101.
3. Godley, B., Blumenthal, J., Broderick, A., Coyne, M., Godfrey, M., Hawkes, L., Witt, M. Satellite tracking of sea turtles: Where have we been and where do we go next? Endangered Species Research, Vol 3 (2007)
4. Honicky, R., Brewer, E., Paulos, E., White, R. N-SMARTS: Networked Suite of Mobile Atmospheric Realtime Sensors. NSDR, Seattle, Washington (2008)
5. Juang, P., Oki, H., Wang, Y., Martonosi, M., and Peh, L. S., Rubenstein, D. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with ZebraNet. ACM Sigplan Notices, Vol. 37, No. 10 (2002) 96-107
6. Morreale, S., Ruiz, G., Spotila, J., Standora, E. Temperature-dependent sex determination: current practices threaten conservation of sea turtles. Science 1982 Jun 11, 216:4551 (1982), 1245-7.
7. Saran, C. Cisco predicts machine-to-machine traffic will increase 22-fold. Computer Weekly (2012)
8. Sea Turtle Research Unit (SEATRU) of Universiti Malaysia Terengganu http://seatru.umt.edu.my/research-2/inest-monitoring-system/
9. Solon, O. Wireless sensor networks aid turtle conservation in Japan. Wired.Co.UK (2013) http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2013-02/06/turtle-conservation-epson
10. Sorber, J., Banerjee, N., Corner, M., Rollins, S. Turducken: Hierarchical Power Management for Mobile Devices. MobiSys (2005), 261-274
11. Zimmerman, T., Chang, K. Simplifying home health monitoring by incorporating a cell phone in a weight scale. PETRA, Athens, Greece (2008)