Better audio performance when video stream is monitored by TCP congestion control

Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo

Volumn 2, Issue , 2003, Pages II321-II324

  Latecki, L J ^a   Kulkarni, K ^a   Mulik, J ^a  

^a Temple University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOUND REPRODUCTION; TRANSMISSION CONTROL PROTOCOL; VIDEO STREAMING;

ARRIVAL TIME; AUDIO AND VIDEO; AUDIO QUALITY; AVERAGE PACKET DELAYS; REAL TIME; REALTIME MULTIMEDIA; TCP CONGESTION CONTROL; VIDEO PACKETS;

VIDEO CONFERENCING;

EID: 84908573204     PISSN: 19457871     EISSN: 1945788X     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICME.2003.1221618     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. D. Andersen, D. Bansal, D. Curtis, S. Seshan and H.Balakrishnan. System support for bandwidth management andcontent adaptation in Internet applications. Proc. Symposium onOperuting Systems Design and Implementation, pp. 2 13-226,San Diego, CA, October 2000.
2. S. Floyd and K. Fall. Promoting the Use of End-to-EndCongestion Control in the Internet, IEEE/ACM Trunsactions onNetworking, August 1999.
3. M. Gaynor, Proactive Packet Dropping Methods for TCPGateways, 1996. htm:/Iwww.eecs.harvard.edu/-aavnor/final.m
4. E. Kohler, M. Handley, S. Floyd, and I. Padhye. DatagramCongestion Control Protocol (DCCP). Internet Engineering TuskForce, INTERNET-DRAFT,http:/lwww.ietf'.ore/internetdraMdraft-ietf-dcco-soec-OO.txt
5. M. Molteni and M. Villari. Using SCTP with PartialReliability for MPEG-4 Multimedia Streaming. Proc. o/BSDCon Europe 2002.
6. NistNet, software provided by National Institute of Standardsand Technology, http:llsnad.ncsl.nist.wviitelnistneti
7. B. White, J. Lepreau, L. Stoller, R. Ricci, S. Gurnprasad, M.Newbold, M. Hibler, C. Barb, and A. Joglekar. An IntegratedExperimental Environment for Distributed Systems andNetworks. Proc. 5th Symposium on Operating Systems Designandlmplemenrution, to appear 2002.