Rejecting knowledge claims inside and outside science

Social Studies of Science

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 722-735

  Collins, Harry ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

arXiv; gravitational waves; rejected knowledge; science and technology policy; scientific controversy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; PHYSICS; SCIENCE;

DECISION MAKING; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; KNOWLEDGE; PHYSICS; REJECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SCIENCE;

EID: 84908556649     PISSN: 03063127     EISSN: 14603659     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0306312714536011     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. BaezJ. (1998). The crackpot index. http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/crackpot.html
2. Boyce T.Journalism and expertise.Journalism Studies. 2006;7 (6): 889-906
3. Boyce THealth, Risk and News: The MMR Vaccine and the Media. New York: Peter Lang; 2007:
4. Carolan MS.Sustainable agriculture, science, and the co-production of ‘expert’ knowledge: The value of interactional expertise.Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability. 2006;11(4):421-431
5. Collins HM.The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks.Social Studies of Science. 1974;4(2):165-186
6. Collins HM.The seven sexes: A study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics.Sociology. 1975;9 (2): 205-224
7. Collins HM.Tantalus and the aliens: Publications, audiences and the search for gravitational waves.Social Studies of Science. 1999;29 (2): 163-197
8. Collins HMGravity’s Shadow: The Search for Gravitational Waves. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2004:
9. Collins HMTacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2010:
10. Collins HMGravity’s Ghost: Scientific Discovery in the Twenty-First Century. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2011a 2013:
11. Collins HM.Language and practice.Social Studies of Science. 2011b;41 (2): 271-300
12. Collins HMAre We All Scientific Experts Now. Cambridge: Polity Press; 2014:
13. Collins HM,Evans R.The third wave of Science Studies: Studies of expertise and experience.Social Studies of Science. 2002;32 (2): 235-296
14. Collins HM,Evans RRethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 2007:
15. Collins HM,Pinch TJOn the Margins of Science: The Social Construction of Rejected Knowledge. Wallis R, ed. Staffordshire: University of Keele; 1979:237-270.
16. Collins HM,Pinch TJThe Golem: What Everyone Should Know about Science. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993:
17. Collins H,Weinel M,Evans R.The politics and policy of the Third Wave: New technologies and society.Critical Policy Studies. 2010;4 (2): 185-201
18. Durant D.Public participation in the making of science policy.Perspectives on Science. 2010;18 (2): 189-225
19. Edwards A,Sheptycki J.Third Wave criminology: Guns, crime and social order.Criminology and Criminal Justice. 2009;9:379-397
20. Epstein SImpure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley, CA; Los Angeles, CA and London: University of California Press; 1996:
21. Gieryn TF.Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists.American Sociological Review. 1983;48(6):781-795
22. Gieryn TFCultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press; 1999:
23. Gorman ME.Scientific and technological expertise.Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology. 2008;1 (1): 23-31
24. Irwin ACitizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge; 1995:
25. Jenkins LD.Bycatch: Interactional expertise, dolphins and the U.S. tuna fishery.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2007;38 (4): 698-712
26. Langmuir I.Pathological science: Colloquium at the Knolls Research Laboratory. Published as Langmuir, Irving, and Robert N. Hall. “Pathological science.”.Physics Today, 42. 1953;10 (2008): 36-48
27. Pinch TJ,Collins HM.Private science and public knowledge: The committee for the scientific investigation of the claims of the paranormal and its use of the literature.Social Studies of Science. 1984;14 (4): 521-546
28. Rawls JA Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press; 1971:
29. Schilhab T.Interactional expertise through the looking glass: A peek at mirror neurons.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2007;38 (4): 741-747
30. Selinger E,Dreyfus HL,Collins HM.Interactional expertise and embodiment.Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 2007;38 (4): 722-740
31. Shapin S.Pump and circumstance: Robert Boyle’s literary technology.Social Studies of Science. 1984;14 (4): 481-520
32. SiegelW. (2011). Are you a quack?http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~siegel/quack.html
33. ‘t HooftG. (2003). How to become a bad theoretical physicist. http://www.staff.science.uu.nl/~hooft101/theoristbad.html
34. Weinel MUK: Cardiff University; 2010:
35. Wynne BRisk, Environment & Modernity: Towards a New Ecology. Lash SSzerszynski BWynne B, ed. London: SAGE; 1996:44-83.