Stated preferences based estimation of power interruption costs in private households: An example from Germany

Energy

Volumn 76, Issue , 2014, Pages 82-90

  Praktiknjo, Aaron J ^a  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Households; Power interruption costs; Renewables; Stated preferences; Supply security; Value of lost load

Indexed keywords

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS; MONTE CARLO METHODS; OUTAGES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOLAR ENERGY; SURVEYS;

HOUSEHOLDS; POWER INTERRUPTION COSTS; RENEWABLES; STATED PREFERENCES; SUPPLY SECURITY; VALUE OF LOST LOAD;

COST ESTIMATING;

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; SOLAR POWER; WIND POWER;

GERMANY;

EID: 84908553041     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.089     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Stern N.H. The economics of climate change: the Stern review 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
2. Johansson B. Security aspects of future renewable Energy systems: a short overview. Energy 2013, 61:598-605.
3. AGEB Bruttostromerzeugung in Deutschland von 1990 bis 2013 nach Energieträgern 2013.
4. Sezgena O., Goldman C.A., Krishnarao P. Option value of electricity demand response. Energy 2007, 32:108-119.
5. Hamachi LaCommare K., Eto J.H. Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States. Energy 2006, 31:1845-1855.
6. Baarsma B.E., Hop J.P. Pricing power outages in the Netherlands. Energy 2009, 34:1378-1386.
7. Praktiknjo A. Sicherheit der Elektrizitätsversorgung - Das Spannungsfeld zwischen Wirtschaftlichkeit und Umweltverträglichkeit 2013, Springer Vieweg.
8. Deppert W., Mielke D., Theobald W. Mensch und Wirtschaft: Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik 2001, Leipzig.
9. Sullivan M.J., Keane D.M. Outage cost estimation guidebook 1995, Electric Power Research Institute, San Francisco.
10. Freeman A.M. The benefits of environmental improvement: theory and practice 1979, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
11. Thayer M.A. Contingent valuation techniques for assessing environmental impacts: further evidence. JEnviron Econ Manage 1981, 27-44.
12. Hanemann W.M. Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ?. Am Econ Rev 1991, 81:635-647.
13. Varian H. Intermediate microeconomics: a modern approach 2009, Norton. 8th ed.
14. Erdmann G., Zweifel P. Energieökonomik 2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
15. Train K.E. Discrete choice methods with simulation 2009, Cambridge University Press. 2nd ed.
16. Blatna D. Outliers in regression. Applications of mathematics and statistics in economy 2006, Trutnov.
17. Walsh J.E. Large sample nonparametric rejection of outlying observations. Ann Inst Statistical Math 1959.
18. Lohninger H. Grundlagen der Statistik. In: eBook E, editor 2012.
19. DESTATIS Qualitätsbericht Einkommens- und Verbrauchsstichprobe 2012, 12. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden.
20. BDEW BDEW-Strompreisanalyse Mai 2012 2012.
21. Sigelmann L., Zeng L. Analyzing censored and sample-selected data with Tobit and Heckit models. Polit Anal 2000, 8:167-182.
22. Massey F.J. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. JAm Statist Assoc 1951, 46:68-78.
23. Praktiknjo A., Hähnel A., Erdmann G. Assessing energy supply security: outage cost in private households. Energy Policy 2011.