Re-focussing research efforts on the public acceptance of energy infrastructure: A critical review

Energy

Volumn 76, Issue , 2014, Pages 4-9

  Cohen, Jed J ^a   Reichl, Johannes ^a   Schmidthaler, Michael ^a  

^a JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Energy infrastructure; Local opposition; Pump hydro storage; Pylons; Social acceptance; Wind farms

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; FIRE TUBE BOILERS; WIND POWER;

ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURES; LOCAL OPPOSITION; PYLONS; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE; WIND FARM;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

INFRASTRUCTURAL DEVELOPMENT; LITERATURE REVIEW; PUMP; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RESEARCH WORK; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGICAL CHANGE; WIND FARM; WIND POWER;

EID: 84908509067     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2013.12.056     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. European Commission Energy 2020-A strategy for competitive, sustainable and secure Energy. Communication 2010, 639.
2. European Commission Energy roadmap 2050. Communication 2011, 885.
3. Devine-Wright P. Reconsidering public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. Delivering a low carbon electricity system 2008, Cambridge University Press, London. M. Grubb, T. Jamasb, M. Pollitt (Eds.).
4. ENTSO-E Ten year network development plan 2012 2012, European Network of Transmission System Operators for Electricity.
5. Dunn B., Kamath H., Tarascon J.M. Electrical energy storage for the grid: a battery of choices. Science 2011, 334:928-935.
6. European Commission Energy technologies: knowledge-perceptions-measures 2006, EUR22396.
7. Toke H.D. Explaining wind power planning outcomes: some findings from a study in England and Wales. Energy Policy 2005, 33:1527-1539.
8. Dimitropoulos A., Kontoleon A. Assessing the determinants of local acceptability of wind-farm investment: a choice experiment in the Greek Aegean Islands. Energy Policy 2009, 37:1842-1854.
9. Evans B., Parks J., Theobald K. Urban wind power and the private sector: community benefits, social acceptance and public engagement. JEnviron Plan Manag 2011, 54(2):227-244.
10. Bronfman N., Jimenez R., Arevalo P., Cifuentes L. Understanding social acceptance of electricity generation sources. Energy Policy 2012, 46:246-252.
11. Calero R., Carta J. Action plan for wind energy development in the Canary Islands. Energy Policy 2004, 34:1185-1197.
12. Wuestenhagen R., Wolsink M., Buerer M.J. Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2683-2691.
13. Raven R.P.J.M., Mourik R.M., Feenstra C.F.J., Heiskanen E. Modulating societal acceptance in new energy projects: towards a toolkit methodology for project managers. Energy 2009, 34:564-574.
14. Wolsink M. Planning of renewables schemes: deliberative and fair decision-making on landscape issues instead of reproachful accusations of non-cooperation. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2692-2704.
15. Filippova O., Rehm M. The impact of proximity to cell phone towers on residential property values. Int J Hous Mark Analysis 2011, 4(3):244-267.
16. Sims S., Dent P. High-voltage overhead power lines and property values: a residential study in the UK. Urban Stud 2005, 42(4):665-694.
17. Sims S., Dent P. Property stigma: wind farms are just the latest fashion. JProp Invest Finance 2007, 25(6):626-651.
18. Van der Horst D. NIMBY or not? exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies. Energy Policy 2007, 35:2705-2714.
19. Devine-Wright P. Rethinking NIMBYism. JCommunity Appl Soc Psychol 2009, 19:426-441.
20. Devine-Wright P. Enhancing local distinctiveness fosters public acceptance of tidal energy: a UK case study. Energy Policy 2011, 39:83-93.
21. Kraeusel J., Möst D. Carbon capture and storage on its way to large-scale deployment: social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany. Energy Policy 2012, 49:642-651.
22. Cremer C. Sozioökonomische Begleitforschung zur gesellschaftlichen Akzeptanz von carbon capture and storage (CCS) auf nationaler und internationaler Ebene: Endberich 2008, Wuppertal Institute, German.
23. Boatwright J. Siting community wind farms: an investigation of NIMBY 2013, Master's thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg (VA).
24. Strazzera E., Mura M., Contu D. Combining choice experiments with psychometric scales to assess the social acceptability of wind energy projects: a latent class approach. Energy Policy 2012, 48:334-347.
25. Groothuis P., Groothuis J., Whitehead J. Green vs. green: measuring the compensation required to site electrical generation windmills in a viewshed. Energy Policy 2008, 36:1545-1550.
26. Willis K.G. Assessing public preferences. Town Plan Rev 2006, 77(4):485-505.
27. Lu C. Amarket approach to transmission facilities in Minnesota and North Dakota 1977, Master's thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge (MA).
28. Gross C. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2727-2736.
29. Nadai A. Planning, siting and the local acceptance of wind power: some lessons from the French case. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2715-2726.
30. Jobert A., Laborgne P., Mimler S. Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 2007, 35(5):2751-2760.
31. Pohl J., Huebner G., Mohs A. Acceptance and stress effects of aircraft obstruction markings of wind turbines. Energy Policy 2012, 50:592-600.
32. Kaldellis J., Kapsali M., Kaldelli E., Katsanou E. Comparing recent views of public attitude on wind energy, photovoltaic and small hydro applications. Renew Energy 2013, 52:197-208.
33. Firestone J., Kempton W., Blaydes-Lilley M., Samoteskul K. Public acceptance of offshore wind power across regions and through time. JEnviron Plan Manag 2012, 55(10):1369-1386.
34. Ellis G., Barry J., Robinson C. Many ways to say no, different ways to say yes: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. JEnviron Plan Manag 2007, 50(4):517-551.
35. Ladenburg J., Dubgaard A. Willingness to pay for reduced visual disamenities from off-shore windfarms in Denmark. Energy Policy 2007, 35:4059-4071.
36. Soini K., Pouta E., Salmiovirta M., Uusitalo M., Kivinen T. Local residents' perceptions of energy landscape: the case of transmission lines. Land Use Policy 2011, 28:294-305.
37. Cotton M., Devine-Wright P. Putting pylons into place: a UK case study of public perspectives on the impacts of high voltage overhead transmission lines. JEnviron Plan Manag 2012, 56(8):1-21.
38. Elliot P., Wadley D. Coming to terms with power lines. Int Plan Stud 2012, 17(2):179-201.
39. Devine-Wright P. Explaining NIMBY objections to a power line: the role of personal, place attachment and project-related factors. Environ Behav 2012, 20(10):1-21.
40. Devine-Wright P., Batel S. Explaining public preferences for high voltage pylon designs: an empirical study of perceived fit in a rural landscape. Land Use Policy 2013, 31:640-649.
41. Becker S., Rodriguez R.A., Andersen G.B., Schramm S., Greiner M. Transmission grid extensions during the build-up of a fully renewable pan-European electricity supply. Energy 2014, 64:404-418.
42. Bond S., Hopkins J. The impact of transmission lines on residential property values: results of a case study in a suburb of Wellington, NZ. Pac Rim Prop Res J 2000, 6(2):52-60.
43. Steffen B. Prospects for pumped-hydro storage in Germany. Energy Policy 2012, 45:420-429.
44. Pfeiffer J., Röpke L., Lippelt J. Kurz zum Klima: Pumpspeicherwerke - bewährte Technologie für eine grüne Zukunft?. ifo Schnelld 2010, 63(16):44-46. [German].
45. Thapaliya R. Huge opposition to Bear Lake pumped storage project [cited 2013 Oct 25]. Hydropower reform coalition [Internet] 2008 Apr 7, Available from:. http://www.hydroreform.org/news/2008/04/07/huge-opposition-to-bear-lake-pumped-storage-project.
46. Warren C., McFayden M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:204-213.
47. Stocker T. The closing door of climate targets. Science 2013, 339:280-282.