Integration of approaches in David Wake's model-taxon research platform for evolutionary morphology

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C :Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 525-536

  Griesemer, James ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

David B. Wake; Evolutionary morphology; Integration; Model taxon; Research system

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICS; EVOLUTION; HISTORY; PHYSIOLOGY; URODELA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BIOLOGY; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; MODELS, ANIMAL; URODELA;

EID: 84908505543     PISSN: 13698486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.03.021     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Allen G. The introduction of Drosophila into the study of heredity and evolution, 1900-1910. Isis 1975, 66:322-333.
2. Amundson R. Two concepts of constraint: Adaptationism and the challenge from developmental biology. Philosophy of Science 1994, 61:556-578.
3. Arthur W.B. The nature of technology: What it is and how it evolves 2009, Free Press of Simon & Schuster, New York.
4. Autumn K., Ryan M.J., Wake D.B. Integrating historical and mechanistic biology enhances the study of adaptation. Quarterly Review of Biology 2002, 77:383-408.
5. Integrating scientific disciplines 1986, Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht. W. Bechtel (Ed.).
6. Bechtel W. Discovering cell mechanisms: The creation of modern cell biology 2006, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Bechtel W., Richardson R. Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research 2010, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
8. Brigandt I. Beyond reduction and pluralism: Toward an epistemology of explanatory integration in biology. Erkenntnis 2010, 73:295-311.
9. Brigandt, I. (in press). From developmental constraint to evolvability: how concepts figure in explanation and disciplinary identity. In A. C. Love (Ed.), Conceptual change in biology: Scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. Berlin: Springer.
10. Brigandt I., Love A.C. Conceptualizing evolutionary novelty: Moving beyond definitional debates. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 2012, 318:417-427.
11. Brigandt, I., & Love, A. C. (2012b). Reductionism in biology. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/reduction-biology.
12. Darden L., Maull N. Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science 1977, 44:43-64.
13. Dupré J. The disorder of things: Metaphysical foundations of the disunity of science 1993, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
14. The disunity of science: Boundaries, contexts, and power 1996, Stanford University Press, Stanford. P. Galison, D. Stump (Eds.).
15. Gerson, E. (in press). The interaction of research systems in the evo-devo juncture. In A. C. Love (Ed.), Conceptual change in biology: Scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. Berlin: Springer.
16. Gerson E. Integration of specialties: An institutional and organizational view. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2013, 44:515-524.
17. Griesemer J. Modeling in the museum: On the role of remnant models in the work of Joseph Grinnell. Biology and Philosophy 1990, 5:3-36.
18. Griesemer J. Development, culture and the units of inheritance. Philosophy of Science 2000, 67:S348-S368.
19. Griesemer, J. (in press). Salamanders teaching evolution: The conceptual development of David Wake's taxon-focused research program and its contributions to evo-devo methodology. In A. C. Love (Ed.), Conceptual change in biology: Scientific and philosophical perspectives on evolution and development. Springer.
20. Grinnell J. The methods and uses of a research museum. The Popular Science Monthly 1910, 77:163-169.
21. How well do facts travel? The dissemination of reliable knowledge 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. P. Howlett, M.S. Morgan (Eds.).
22. Hull D. Philosophy of biological science 1974, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Hull D. Science as a process 1988, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
24. Jaekel M., Wake D.B. Developmental processes underlying the evolution of a derived foot morphology in salamanders. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2007, 104:20437-20442.
25. Kitcher P. Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world. Scientific explanation 1989, 410-505. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science XIII. P. Kitcher, W. Salmon (Eds.).
26. Kitcher P. Unification as a regulative ideal. Perspectives on Science 1999, 7:337-348.
27. Kohler R. Lords of the fly: Drosophila genetics and the experimental life 1994, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
28. Larson A., Wake D.B., Maxson L.R., Highton R. A molecular phylogenetic perspective on the origins of morphological novelties in the salamanders of the tribe Plethodontini (Amphibia, Plethodontidae). Evolution 1981, 35:405-422.
29. Lombard, R. E. (2007). Biography. The Academy Of Distinguished Medical Educators, Pritzker School Of Medicine, University Of Chicago. http://pritzker.uchicago.edu/about/academy/members/lombard.shtml.
30. Lombard R.E., Wake D.B. Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. I. Introduction, theory and a general model of dynamics. Journal of Morphology 1976, 148:265-286.
31. Lombard R.E., Wake D.B. Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. II. Function and evolutionary diversity. Journal of Morphology 1977, 153:39-80.
32. Lombard R.E., Wake D.B. Tongue evolution in the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. IV. Phylogeny of plethodontid salamanders and the evolution of feeding dynamics. Systematic Zoology 1986, 35:532-551.
33. Love A.C. Explaining evolutionary innovation and novelty: Criteria of adequacy and multidisciplinary prerequisites. Philosophy of Science 2008, 75:874-886.
34. Love A.C. From philosophy to science (to natural philosophy): Evolutionary developmental perspectives. Quarterly Review of Biology 2008, 83:65-76.
35. Mitchell S.D. Integrative pluralism. Philosophy of Science 2002, 17:55-70.
36. Mitchell S.D. Biological complexity and integrative pluralism 2003, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
37. Mitchell S.D. Why integrative pluralism?. E:CO 2004, 6(1-2):81-91.
38. Mueller R.L., Macey J.R., Jaekel M., Wake D.B., Boore J.L. Morphological homoplasy, life history evolution, and historical biogeography of plethodontid salamanders inferred from complete mitochondrial genomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2004, 101:13820-13825.
39. Nagel E. The structure of science: Problems in the logic of scientific explanation 1961, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York.
40. O'Malley M.A., Soyer O.S. The roles of integration in molecular systems biology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2012, 43:58-68.
41. O'Malley M.A. When integration fails: Prokaryote phylogeny and the tree of life. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 2013, 44:551-562.
42. Shubin N., Wake D.B. Phylogeny, variation, and morphological integration. American Zoologist 1996, 36:51-60.
43. Sunderland M. Collections-based research at Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences 2012, 42(2):83-113.
44. Sunderland, M. (submitted for publication). Making a model taxon: The development of Ensatina eschscholtzii as a model for studying evolution. Isis.
45. Thexton A.J., Wake D.B., Wake M.H. Tongue function in the salamander Bolitoglossa occidentalis. Archives of Oral Biology 1977, 22:361-366.
46. Vieites D.R., Román S.N., Wake M.H., Wake D.B. A multigenic perspective on phylogenetic relationships in the largest family of salamanders, the Plethodontidae. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2011, 59:623-635.
47. Wake, D. B. (1960). The osteology and relationships of the salamander genus Aneides Baird. M.S. Thesis. University of Southern California, Los Angeles.
48. Wake D.B. Comparative osteology and evolution of the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. Memoirs of the Southern California Academy of Science 1966, 4:1-111.
49. Wake D.B. A view of evolution. [Review of] phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process, by N. Eldredge and J. Cracraft. Science 1980, 210:1239-1240.
50. Wake D.B. Functional and evolutionary morphology. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 1982, 25:603-620.
51. Wake D.B. Functional and developmental constraints and opportunities in the evolution of feeding systems in urodeles. Environmental adaptation and evolution 1982, 51-66. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart. D. Mossakowski, G. Roth (Eds.).
52. Wake D.B. Homoplasy: The result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?. Americal Naturalist 1991, 138:543-567.
53. Wake, D. B. (1996). Introduction. In M. J. Sanderson & L. Hufford (Eds.), Homoplasy, the recurrence of similarity in evolution (pp. xvii-xxv). San Diego: Academic Press.
54. Wake D.B. What salamanders have taught us about evolution. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 2009, 40:333-352.
55. Wake, D. B., Blackburn, D. C., & Lombard, R. E. (in press). An assessment of the extent of homoplasy in the evolution of tongue feeding in Plethodontid salamanders.
56. Wake D.B., Larson A. Multidimensional analysis of an evolving lineage. Science 1987, 238:42-48.
57. Wake, D. B., Mabee, P., Hanken, J., & Wagner, G. (1991). Development and evolution - The emergence of a new field. In E. C. Dudley (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, ICSEB IV (Vol. 1, pp. 582-588). Dioscorides, Portland.
58. Wake D.B., Roth G., Wake M.H. Tongue evolution in lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. III. Patterns of peripheral innervation. Journal of Morphology 1983, 178:207-224.
59. Wiens J.J., Bonett R.M., Chippendale P.T. Ontogeny discombobulates phylogeny: Paedomorphosis and higher-level salamander relationships. Systematic Biology 2005, 54(1):91-110.