Generalization by Mechanism: Thin Rationality and Ideal-type Analysis in Case Study Research

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 707-732

  Bengtsson, Bo ^a   Hertting, Nils ^a  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

case studies; generalization; ideal types; rationality; social mechanisms

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908500068     PISSN: 00483931     EISSN: 15527441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0048393113506495     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Adriaanse C.The Importance of Norms: Behavioural Game Theory as a Tool to Understand Neighbourhood Events.Housing, Theory and Society. 2011;28 (1): 39-60
2. Ansell C.,Gash A.Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. 2008;18 (4): 543-71
3. Aronovitch H.Interpreting Weber’s Ideal-Types.Philosophy of the Social Sciences. 2012;42 (3): 356-69
4. Bates R. H.,Greif A.,Levi M.,Rosenthal J.-L.,Weingast B. R.Analytic Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1998:
5. Bengtsson B.Tenants’ Dilemma—On Collective Action in Housing.Housing Studies. 1998;13 (1): 99-120
6. Bengtsson B.Solving The Tenants’ Dilemma: Collective Action and Norms of Co-operation in Housing.Housing, Theory and Society. 2000;17 (4): 175-87
7. Bengtsson B.,Ruonavaara H.Comparative Process Tracing in Housing Studies.International Journal of Housing Policy. 2011;11 (4): 395-414
8. Bennett A.Rethinking Social Inquiry. Brady H. E.Collier D., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2010:207-20.
9. Boudon R.Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Hedström P.Swedberg R., ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998:172-203.
10. Brady H. E.Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2010. “Data-Set Observations Versus Causal-Process Observations: The 2000 U.S. Presidential Election.” In Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed., edited by BradyH. E.CollierD., 237-42. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Brady H. E.Collier D., ed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2010:237-42.
11. Brady H. E.,Collier D.Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards, 2nd ed.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield; 2010:
12. Chandra K.Mechanisms vs. Outcomes.Qualitative Methods. 2006;4 (1): 6-13
13. Coleman J. S.Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1990:
14. Collier D.Understanding Process Tracing.PS: Political Science & Politics. 2011;44 (4): 823-30
15. Collier D.,Mahon J. E.Conceptual ‘Stretching’ Revisited: Adapting Categories in Comparative Analysis.American Political Science Review. 1993;87 (4): 845-55
16. Davidson D.Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1984:
17. Eckstein H.The Handbook of Political Science. Greenstein F. I.Polsby N. W., ed. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1975:79-137.
18. Elster J.Sour Grapes. Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1983:
19. Elster J.Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989a:
20. Elster J.The Cement of Society. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1989b:
21. Elster J.Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Hedström P.Swedberg R., ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998:45-73.
22. Falleti T. G.,Lynch J. F.Context and Causal Mechanisms in Political Analysis.Comparative Political Studies. 2009;42 (9): 1143-66
23. Ferejohn J.,Satz D.The Rational Choice Controversy. Friedman J., ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1996:71-84.
24. Flyvbjerg B.Rationality and Power. Democracy in Practice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1998:
25. Flyvbjerg B.Making Social Science Matter. Why Social Inquiry Fails and How It Can Succeed Again. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2001:
26. Flyvbjerg B.Five Misunderstandings about Case-Study Research.Qualitative Inquiry. 2006;12 (2): 219-45
27. George A. L.,Bennett A.Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2005:
28. Gerring J.What Is a Case Study and What Is It Good for?”.American Political Science Review. 2004;98 (2): 341-54
29. Gerring J.Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 2007:
30. Gerring J.The Mechanismic Worldview. Thinking Inside the Box.British Journal of Political Science. 2008;38 (1): 161-79
31. Gerring J.Causal Mechanisms: Yes, But..Comparative Political Studies. 2010;43 (11): 1499-526
32. Goertz G.,Mahoney J.A Tale of Two Cultures: Causal Mechanisms and Process Tracing.Qualitative & Multi-Method Research. 2010;8 (2): 24-30
33. Goertz G.,Mahoney J.A Tale of Two Cultures. Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2012:
34. Green D.,Shapiro I.Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1994:
35. Gross N.A Pragmatist Theory of Social Mechanisms.American Sociological Review. 2009;74 (3): 358-79
36. Hay C.Political Analysis. A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2002:
37. Hedström P.,Swedberg R.Rational Choice, Empirical Research, and the Sociological Tradition.European Sociological Review. 1996;12 (2): 127-46
38. Hedström P.,Swedberg R.Social Mechanisms. An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Hedström P.Swedberg R., ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998:1-31.
39. Hedström P.,Ylikoski P.Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences.Annual Review of Sociology. 2010;36:49-67
40. Hertting N.Samverkan på spel. Rationalitet och frustration i nätverksstyrning och svensk stadsförnyelse. Stockholm, Sweden: Égalité; 2003:
41. Hertting N.Theories of Democratic Network Governance. Torfing J.Sorensen E., ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan; 2007:43-60.
42. Huxham C.Theorizing Collaboration Practice.Public Management Review. 2003;5 (3): 401-23
43. Johnson J.The Economic Approach to Politics. Monroe K., ed. New York: Harper Collins; 1991:113-42.
44. Johnson J.Consequences of Positivism: A Pragmatist Assessment.Comparative Political Studies. 2006;39 (2): 224-52
45. King G.,Keohane R. O.,Verba S.Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1994:
46. Levi M.Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture and Structure. Lichbach M. I.Zuckerman A. S., ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1997:19-41.
47. Lieberson S.What Is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Ragin C. C.Becker H. S., ed. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1992:105-18.
48. Mahoney J.Beyond Correlational Analysis: Recent Innovations in Theory and Method.Sociological Forum. 2001;16 (3): 575-93
49. Mahoney J.Toward a Unified Theory of Causality.Comparative Political Studies. 2008;41 (4-5): 412-36
50. Mahoney J.After KKV. The New Methodology of Qualitative Research.World Politics. 2010;62 (1): 120-47
51. Mill J. S.A System of Logic: Ratiocinative and Inductive. Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press; (1843) 1967:
52. Ostrom E.Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005:
53. Payne G.,Williams M.Generalization in qualitative research.Sociology. 2005;39 (2): 295-314
54. Popper K.Popper Selections. Miller D., ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; (1967) 1985:357-65.
55. Przeworski A.,Teune H.The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. New York: Wiley; 1970:
56. Ragin C. C.Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2008:
57. Sartori G.Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics.American Political Science Review. 1970;64 (4): 1033-53
58. Scharpf F.Games Real Actors Play. Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; 1997:
59. Simon H. A.A behavioral model of rational choice.Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1955;69 (1): 99-118
60. Somerville P.,Bengtsson B.Constructionism, Realism and Housing Theory.Housing, Theory and Society. 2002;19 (3-4): 121-36
61. Sørensen E.,Torfing J.Theories on Democratic Network Governance. Sørensen E.Torfing J., ed. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave MacMillan; 2007:25-42.
62. Tsebelis G.Nested Games. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1990:
63. Tversky A.,Kahneman D.The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice.Science. 1981;211 (4481): 453-58
64. Waldner D.What Are Mechanisms and What Are They Good for?”.Qualitative & Multi-Method Research. 2010;8 (2): 30-34
65. Weber M.The Methodology of the Social Sciences. Shils E. A.Finch H. A., ed. New York: Free Press; 1903-1917:
66. Whitehead A. N.Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Macmillan; 1929:
67. Yin R. K.Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; (1984) 2009: