Theoretical model for the identification of hydrological heritage sites

Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 19-30

  Simić, Sava ^a   Milovanović, Boško ^b   Glavonjić, Tamara Jojić ^b  

^a Institute of Nature conservation of Serbia   (Serbia)

^b SERBIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES AND ARTS   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Evaluation criteria; Geoheritage site; Hydrological heritage; Hydrological heritage site; Theoretical model

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; HERITAGE CONSERVATION; HYDROLOGICAL REGIME; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; THEORETICAL STUDY; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER RESOURCE;

EID: 84908451307     PISSN: 18424090     EISSN: 1844489X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bâca, I. 2011. Contributions to Inventory and assessment of the geomorphosites from Calimani National Park. Case stuy: Bistricior massif. Analele Universităţii din Oradea - Seria Geografie (year XXI), 1/2011, 5-15.
2. Belij, S. & Simić, S. 2008. Category of hydrologic heritage in the system of geoheritage and nature protection of Serbia. (in Serbian) Protection of nature, 58/1-2, 27-36.
3. Bruschi, V.M. & Cendrero, A. 2005. Geosite evaluation; Can we measure intangible values? II Quaternario, Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18 (1) - Volume Speciale, 293-306.
4. Coratza, P. & Giusti, C. 2005. Methodological proposal for the assessment of the scientific quality of geomorphosites. Il Quaternario, Italian Journal of Quaternary Sciences, 18 (1) - Volume Speciale, 18 (1), 307-313.
5. Dangić, A. 1998. Geological heritage of Serbia - identification, categorization and protection of the heritage objects. (in Serbian) Protection of nature, 48-49, 71-78.
6. Erhartić, B. 2010. Geomorphosite assesment (Vrednotenje geomorfološke dediščine). Acta geographica Slovenica, 50-2, 295-319.
7. Fines, K.D. 1968. Landscape evaluation: a research project in east Sussex. Reg. Studies, 2:41.
8. Gavrilović, Lj., Belij, S. & Simić, S. 2008. Hydrological heritage of Serbia - Preliminary list. (in Serbian) Protection of nature, 60 (1-2), 387-396.
9. Grandgirard, V. 1999. L'évaluation des géotopes. Geologia Insubrica 4:59-66.
10. Jovičić, D. & Brankov, J. 2009. Tourism attractions: Key elements of tourism resource base. Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, 89 (1), 3-20.
11. Lazarević, R. 1998. Speleological values of Serbia. (in Serbian), Protection of nature, 48-49, 47-52.
12. Leopold, L.B. 1969. Landscape aesthetics. Nat. History, 10:35.
13. Linton, D.L. 1968. The assessment of scenery as a natural resource. Scottish Geographical Magazine, 84:218.
14. Marković, J. 1991. The importance of the complete protection of nature. (in Serbian) Protection of nature, 43-44, 7-19.
15. Panizza, M. 2001. Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. Chinese Science Bulletin, 46, 4-6.
16. Pereira, P. & Pereira Caetano Alves, M.I. 2007. Geomorphosite assessment in Montesihno Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica, Jg. 62, 3, 159-168.
17. Pereira, P. & Pereira, D. 2010. Methodological guidelines for geomorphosite assessment (Indications methodologiques pour l'evaluation des geomorphosites). Geomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement 2, 215-222.
18. Petrovic, M. D., Vasiljević, D{stroke}. A., Vujičić, M. D., Hose, T.A., Marković, S. B. & Lukić, T. 2013. Global geopark and candidate - comparative analysis of Papuk mountain geopark (Croatia) and Fruška gora mountain (Serbia) by using GAM model. Carpathian Journal of Earth and Environmental Sciences, 8 (1), 105-116.
19. Pralong, J.P. 2005. Méthode pour l'évaluation du potential et de l'utilisation touristiques de sites géomorphologiques. Géomorphologie: Relief, Processus, Environnement, 3, 189-196.
20. Purice, C., Romanescu, Gh. & Romanescu, Ga. 2013. The protection of the Geomorphosites within the Măcin Mountains National Park (Romania) and their Touristic Importance. International Journal of Conservation Science, 4 (3), 373-383.
21. Reynard, E., Fontana, G., Kozlik, L. & Scapozza, C. 2007. A method for assessing "scientific" an "additional values" of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, Jg. 62, 3, 148-158.
22. Serrano, E. & Gonzales-Trueba, J.J. 2005. Assessment of geomorphosites in natural protected areas: the Picos de Europa National Park (Spain). Geomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, 3, 197-208.
23. Simić, S., Gavrilović, Lj. & D{stroke}urović, P. 2010a{cyrillic}. Geodiversity and geoheritage - New approach to the interpretation of the terms. Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, 90 (2), 1-14.
24. Simić, S., Gavrilović, Lj. & Belij, S. 2010b. Hydrological heritage: New direction in hydrology and geoheritage. Bulletin of the Serbian Geographical Society, 90 (4), 83-102.
25. Simić, S. 2011. Hydrological heritage within protection of geodiversity in Serbia - legislation history. Journal of Geographical Institute "Jovan Cvijić" SASA, 61 (3), 17-32.
26. Simić, S., Gavrilović, B., Živković, N. & Gavrilović Lj. 2012. Protection of Hydrological Heritage Sites of Serbia - Problems and Perspectives. Geographica Pannonica, 16, 3, 84-93.
27. Wimbledon, W. A., Benton, M. J., Bevins, R. E., Black, G. P., Bridgland, D. R., Cleal, C. J., Cooper, R. G. & May, V. J. 1995. The development of a methodology for the selection of British geological sites for conservation: part 1. Modern geology, vol. 1, Amsterdam.
28. Vasiljević, B., 1983. The particular values of the hydrological phenomena and some aspects of their protection in the socialistic republic of Serbia (in Serbian). Protection of nature, 36, 111-126.
29. Vujičić, M.D. 2011. Preliminary geosite assessment model (gam) an its application on Fruška Gora mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta geographica Slovenica, 51-2, 361-377.
30. Zouros, N.C. 2007. Geomorphosite assessment and management in protected areas of Greece Case study of the Lesvos island - coastal geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica, 62, 3, 169-180.