Effect of spatial data resolution on uncertainty

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 63, Issue , 2015, Pages 87-96

  Pogson, Mark ^a,b   Smith, Pete ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BOLTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aggregation; Interpolation; Raster grid size; Resolution; Spatial autocorrelation; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

INTERPOLATION; OPTICAL RESOLVING POWER;

GRID SIZE; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATIONS; SPATIAL DATA RESOLUTION; UNCERTAINTY;

AGGLOMERATION;

EID: 84908425504     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.09.021     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anselin L. Local indicators of spatial association - LISA. Geogr. Anal. 1995, 27:93-115.
2. Beale C.M., Lennon J.J., Yearsley J.M., Brewer M.J., Elston D.A. Regression analysis of spatial data. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:246-264.
3. Bian L. Multiscale nature of spatial data in scaling up environmental models. Scale in Remote Sensing and GIS 1997, 13-26. CRC Press. D.A. Quattrochi, M.F. Goodchild (Eds.).
4. Booji M.J. Impact of climate change on river flooding assessed with different spatial model resolutions. J.Hydrol. 2005, 303:176-198.
5. Buss S.R. 3-D Computer Graphics: a Mathematical Introduction with OpenGL 2003, 99-108. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
6. Carletti R., Picci M., Romano D. Kriging and bilinear methods for estimating spatial pattern of atmospheric pollutants. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2000, 63:341-359.
7. Chaubey I., Cotter A.S., Costello T.A., Soerens T.S. Effect of DEM data resolution on SWAT output uncertainty. Hydrol. Process 2005, 19:621-628.
8. Edwards A.L. An Introduction to Linear Regression and Correlation 1976, 33-46. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.
9. FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISSCAS/JRC Harmonized World Soil Database (Version 1.2) 2012, (FAO, Rome, Italy and IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria).
10. Fischer M.M., Wang J. Spatial Data Analysis: Models, Methods and Techniques 2011, 1-5. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
11. Hengl T. Finding the right pixel size. Comput. Geosci. 2006, 32:1283-1298.
12. Heuvelink G.B.M. Error Propagation in Quantitative Spatial Modelling, Applications in Geographical Information Systems. Netherlands Geographical Studies, Knag/Faculteit Ruimtelijke Wetenschappen Universiteit Utrecht 1993.
13. Knotters M., Heuvelink G.B.M., Hoogland T., Walvoort D.J.J. ADisposition of Interpolation Techniques. Wageningen, Statutory Research Tasks Unit for Nature and the Environment, WOt-werkdocument 190 2010.
14. Krause E.F. Taxicab Geometry: an Adventure in Non-euclidean Geometry 1987, 2-5. Dover Publications, New York, USA.
15. Lark R.M. Regression analysis with spatially autocorrelated error: simulation studies and application to mapping of soil organic matter. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2000, 14:247-264.
16. Li J., Heap A.D. AReview of Spatial Interpolation Methods for Environmental Scientists 2008, 4-10. Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia, Record 2008/23.
17. Mishra U., Torn M.S., Fingerman K. Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon. GCB Bioenergy 2013, 5:391-399.
18. Moran P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 1950, 37:17-23.
19. Perlin K. An image synthesizer. Comp. Graph. (Proceedings ACM SIGGRAPH 85) 1985, 19:287-296.
20. Pisoni E., Carnevale C., Volta M. Sensitivity to spatial resolution of modelling systems designing air quality control policies. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:66-73.
21. Pogson M. Modelling miscanthus yields with low resolution input data. Ecol. Model 2011, 222:3849-3853.
22. Pogson M., Hastings A., Smith P. Sensitivity of crop model predictions to entire meteorological and soil input datasets highlights vulnerability to drought. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2012, 29:37-43.
23. Schimdt C., Rounsevell M.D.A., La Jeunesse I. The limitations of spatial land use data in environmental analysis. Environ. Sci. Policy 2006, 9:174-188.
24. Sensen C.W., Hallgrímsson B. Advanced Imaging in Biology and Medicine: Technology, Software Environments, Applications 2009, 131-170. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
25. Smith P., Smith J.U., Powlson D.S., McGill W.B., Arah J.R.M., Chertov O.G., Coleman K., Franko U., Frolking S., Jenkinson D.S., Jensen L.S., Kelly R.H., Klein-Gunnewiek H., Konarov A.S., Li C., Molina J.A.E., Mueller T., Parton W.J., Thornley J.H.M., Whitmore A.P. Acomparison of the performance of nine soil organic matter models using datasets from seven long-term experiments. Geoderma 1997, 81:153-225.
26. Stampfl P.F., Clifton-Brown J.C., Jones M.B. European-wide GIS-based modelling system for quantifying the feedstock from miscanthus and the potential contribution to renewable energy targets. Glob. Change Biol. 2007, 13:2283-2295.
27. Stein A., Riley J., Halberg N. Issues of scale for environmental indicators. Agr. Ecosyst. Environ. 2001, 87:215-232.
28. Taylor J.R. An Introduction to Error Analysis: the Study of Uncertainties in Physical Measurements 1997, 73-79. University Science Books, Sausalito, USA.
29. Vaze J., Teng J., Spencer G. Impact of DEM accuracy and resolution on topographic indices. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2010, 25:1086-1098.
30. Wang S., Hastings A., Smith P. An optimization model for energy crop supply. GCB Bioenergy 2012, 4:88-95.
31. Witten I.H., Frank E. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques 2005, 176-179. Morgan Kauffman Publishers, San Francisco, USA. second ed.
32. Wood S.N. Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics 2006, 62:1025-1036.
33. Yang Y., Atkinson P., Ettema D. Individual space-time activity-based modelling of infectious disease transmission within a city. J.R. Soc. Interface 2008, 6:759-772.
34. Yue T.-X., Jorgensen S.E., Larocque G.R. Progress in global ecological modelling. Ecol. Model 2011, 222:2172-2177.