Impact of agricultural-based biofuel production on greenhouse gas emissions from land-use change: Key modelling choices

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 344-360

  Panichelli, Luis ^a,b   Gnansounou, Edgard ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b NONE   (Serbia)

Author keywords

Biofuel; Greenhouse gasemission; Land use change; Modelling choice; Policy

Indexed keywords

BIOFUELS; EMISSION CONTROL; FEEDSTOCKS; FORESTRY; GAS EMISSIONS; LAND USE; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; SUPPLY CHAINS;

BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; COMPARISON OF MODELS; GAS MODELS; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSION REDUCTION; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; GREENHOUSE GASEMISSION; GREENHOUSES GAS; KEY MODELS; LANDUSE CHANGE; MODEL CHOICE;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

EID: 84908415776     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.026     Document Type: Review

References (160)

1. J van Dam, M Junginger, and APC. Faaij From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 14 2010 2445 2472
2. L Panichelli, and E. Gnansounou Estimating greenhouse gas emissions from indirect land-use change in biofuels production: concepts and exploratory analysis for soybean-based biodiesel production J Sci Ind Res 2008 1017 1030
3. CARB Low carbon fuel standard (LCFS) 2009 Air Resource Board, California Envrionmental Protection Agency California 63
4. EPA Regulation of fuels and fuel additives: changes to renewable fuel standard program: final rule. Renewable fuel standard program (RFS2) 2010 Federal Register Washington, DC 14669 15320
5. EC. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. In: European Commision, editor. Bussels: Official Journal of the European Union; 2009. p. 16-62.
6. J Fargione, J Hill, D Tilman, S Polasky, and P. Hawthorne Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt Science 319 2008 1235 1238
7. CBES. Land-use change and bioenergy: report from the 2009 workshop. In: U.S. Department of Energy OoEEaREaORNL, Center for Bioenergy Sustainability, editor. Land-use change and bioenergy experts workshop. Vonore, Tennessee: Center for BioEnergy Sustainability, Oak Ridge National Laboratory; 2009. p. 76.
8. M Banse, H van Meijl, A Tabeau, G Woltjer, F Hellmann, and PH. Verburg Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural production and land use Biomass Bioenergy 35 2011 2385 2390
9. D Johansson, and C. Azar A scenario based analysis of land competition between food and bioenergy production in the US Clim Change 82 2007 267 291
10. Keeney R, Hertel TW. The indirect land use impacts of U.S. biofuel policies: the importance of acreage, yield, and bilateral trade responses. GTAP working paper. West Lafayette IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2008. p. 38.
11. H Kim, S Kim, and BE. Dale Biofuels land use change and greenhouse gas emissions: some unexplored variables Environ Sci Technol 43 2009 961 967
12. DM Lapola, R Schaldach, J Alcamo, A Bondeau, J Koch, and C Koelking Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 107 2010 3388 3393
13. JM Melillo, JM Reilly, DW Kicklighter, AC Gurgel, TW Cronin, and S Paltsev Indirect emissions from biofuels: how important? Science 326 2009 1397 1399
14. T Searchinger, R Heimlich, RA Houghton, F Dong, A Elobeid, and J Fabiosa Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change Science 319 2008 1238 1240
15. R Righelato, and DV. Spracklen Carbon mitigation by biofuels or by saving and restoring forests? Science 317 2007 902
16. CE Ridley, CM Clark, SD LeDuc, BG Bierwagen, BB Lin, and A Mehl Biofuels: network analysis of the literature reveals key environmental and economic unknowns Environ Sci Technol 46 2012 1309 1315
17. R Edwards, D Mulligan, and L. Marelli Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand - comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks (JRC scientific and technical reports) 2010 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Energy Ispra (VA), Italy
18. J. Witcover, S. Yeh, and D. Sperling Policy options to address global land use change from biofuels Energy Policy 56 2013 63 74
19. M. Finkbeiner Indirect land use change - help beyond the hype? Biomass Bioenergy 62 2014 218 221
20. M Khanna, and CL. Crago Measuring indirect land use change with biofuels: implications for policy Annu Rev Resour Econ 4 2012 161 184
21. L Di Lucia, S Ahlgren, and K. Ericsson The dilemma of indirect land-use changes in EU biofuel policy - an empirical study of policy-making in the context of scientific uncertainty Environ Sci Policy 16 2012 9 19
22. AM Nassar, L Harfuch, LC Bachion, and MR. Moreira Biofuels and land-use changes: searching for the top model Interface Focus 1 2011 224 232
23. E Warner, D Inman, B Kunstman, B Bush, L Vimmerstedt, and S Peterson Modeling biofuel expansion effects on land use change dynamics Environ Res Lett 8 2013 015003
24. S Kim, and BE. Dale Indirect land use change for biofuels: testing predictions and improving analytical methodologies Biomass Bioenergy 35 2011 3235 3240
25. TW Hertel, and ME. Tsigas Chapter 2: "structure of GTAP" T.W. Hertel, Global trade analysis: modeling and applications 1997 Cambridge University Press Cambridge
26. A. Demirbas Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review Appl Energy 86 2009 108 117
27. Gnansounou E, Panichelli L. Background document. Workshop on biofuels and land use change. São Paulo, Brazil: Roundtable on Sustainable Biofuels, Energy Center, EPFL; 2008.
28. van Tongeren F, van Meijl H, Veenendal P, Frandsen S, Staehr M, Brockmeier M, et al. In: Review of agricultural trade models: an assessment of models with EU policy relevance third annual conference on global economic analysis. Monash University, Australia: GTAP; 2002.
29. P Witzke, M Banse, H Gömann, T Heckelei, T Breuer, and S Mann Modelling of energy-crops in agricultural sector models - a review of existing methodologies Ignacio Pérez Domínguez, Marc Müller, JRC scientific and technical reports 2008 European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies Luxembourg 59
30. D De La Torre Ugarte, B English, K Jensen, C Hellwinckel, J Menard, and B. Wilson Economic and agricultural impacts of ethanol and biodiesel expansion 2006 Department of Agricultural Economics - The University of Tennessee Knoxville, TN, US 98
31. DG De La Torre Ugarte, and DE. Ray Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework Biomass Bioenergy 18 2000 291 308
32. P Havlík, UA Schneider, E Schmid, H Böttcher, S Fritz, and R Skalský Global land-use implications of first and second generation biofuel targets Energy Policy 39 2011 5690 5702
33. H. Briassoulis Analysis of land use change: theoretical and modeling approaches 2000 Regional Research Institute (WVU) Lesvos
34. JP Lesschen, PH Verburg, and SJ. Staal Statistical methods for analysing the spatial dimension of changes in land use and farming systems (LUCC report series no. 7) 2005 The International Livestock Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya- LUCC Focus 3 Office, Wageningen University, the Netherlands Nairobi 81
35. Stratus Consulting Inc. A review of land use/land cover and agricultural change models (PIER project report) 2005 California Energy Commission, Public Interest Energy Research Program
36. F Hellmann, and PH. Verburg Spatially explicit modelling of biofuel crops in Europe Biomass Bioenergy 35 2011 2411 2424
37. Ronneberger KE. The global agricultural land-use model KLUM - a coupling tool for integrated assessment, PhD thesis. Hamburg: Department Geowissenschaften-Universitat Hamburg; 2006.
38. R Schaldach, JA Priess, and J. Alcamo Simulating the impact of biofuel development on country-wide land-use change in India Biomass Bioenergy 35 2011 2401 2410
39. J Scheffran, and T. BenDor Bioenergy and land use: a spatial-agent dynamic model of energy crop production in Illinois Int J Environ Pollut 39 2009 4 27
40. H van Meijl, T van Rheenen, A Tabeau, and B. Eickhout The impact of different policy environments on agricultural land use in Europe Agric Ecosyst Environ 114 2006 21 38
41. K Ronneberger, M Berrittellac, F Bosellod, and RSJ Tol KLUM@GTAP: introducing biophysical aspects of land-use decisions into a general equilibrium model: a coupling experiment 2006 Forschungsstelle Nachhaltige Umweltentwicklung, Universität Hamburg Hamburg 39
42. W Wu, R Shibasaki, P Yang, G Tan, K-i Matsumura, and K. Sugimoto Global-scale modelling of future changes in sown areas of major crops Ecol Modell 208 2007 378 390
43. DC Parker, SM Manson, MA Janssen, MJ Hoffmann, and P. Deadman Multi-agent systems for the simulation of land-use and land-cover change: a review Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2002 75
44. JA Mathews, and H. Goldsztein Capturing latecomer advantages in the adoption of biofuels: the case of Argentina Energy Policy 37 2009 326 337
45. Q Bao Le, SJ Park, Vlek PLG, and AB. Cremers Land-use dynamic simulator (LUDAS): a multi-agent system model for simulating spatio-temporal dynamics of coupled human-landscape system. I. Structure and theoretical specification Ecol Inf 3 2008 135 153
46. K Happe, A Balmann, and K. Kellermann The agricultural policy simulator (Agripolis) - an agent-based model to study structural change in agriculture (version 1.0) 2004 Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe Halle 48
47. Bantz SG, Deaton ML. Understanding U.S. biodiesel industry growth using system dynamics modeling. In: DeVore MD, editor. Systems and information engineering design symposium. Harlottesville, VG; 2006.
48. Bush B, Duffy M, Sandor D, Peterson S. Using system dynamics to model the transition to biofuels in the United States. In: International conference on system of systems engineering (SoSE '08). Montreal: IEEE; 2008. p. 1-6.
49. Franco C, Ochoa MC, Florez AM. A system dynamics approach to biofuels in Colombia. In: International conference of the system dynamics society. Albuquerque, New Mexico, US: System Dynamics Society; 2009.
50. C He, P Shi, J Chen, X Li, Y Pan, and J Li Developing land use scenario dynamics model by the integration of system dynamics model and cellular automata model Sci China, Ser D: Earth Sci 48 2005 1979 1989
51. Stamboulis Y, Papachristos G. Investigation and modelling framework of biofuels as a new socio-technical regime. In: International conference of the system dynamics society. Athens, Greece; 2008.
52. Y Jahara, A Sabri, and SW. Kennedy Impacts of biodiesel development on the palm oil industry Malays J Econ Stud 43 2006 1 13
53. Kim GR. Analysis of global food market and food-energy price links - based on system dynamics approach. In: International conference of the system dynamics society. Albuquerque, New Mexico, US: System Dynamics Society; 2009.
54. Sandvik S, Moxnes E. Peak oil, biofuels, and long-term food security. In: International conference of the system dynamics society. Albuquerque, New Mexico, US: System Dynamics Society; 2009.
55. Shri Dewi A, Fatimah MA, Mad NS, Zulkornain Y. The impact of biodiesel demand on the Malaysian palm oil market: a combination of econometric and system dynamics approach. In: International conference on business and economic research (ICBER). Kuching, Sarawak: Global Research Agency; 2010.
56. K. Saeed Agricultural land use and food security in Asia: green revolution and beyond. Social science and policy studies 2000 Worcester Polytechnic Institute Worcester, MA 24
57. Q Shen, Q Chen, B-s Tang, S Yeung, Y Hu, and G. Cheung A system dynamics model for the sustainable land use planning and development Habitat Int 33 2009 15 25
58. H Yamamoto, J Fujino, and K. Yamaji Evaluation of bioenergy potential with a multi-regional global-land-use-and-energy model Biomass Bioenergy 21 2001 185 203
59. H Yamamoto, K Yamaji, and J. Fujino Evaluation of bioenergy resources with a global land use and energy model formulated with SD technique Appl Energy 63 1999 101 113
60. JJ. Sheehan Sustainable biofuels: a commonsense perspective on California's approach to biofuels & global land use Ind Biotechnol 2009 93 103
61. Monson M. Minnesota biofuels policy: analysis of the existing renewable fuel standard and a potential low carbon fuel standard. In: International conference of the system dynamics society. Athens, Greece: System Dynamics Society; 2008.
62. N Szarka, O Kakucs, J Wolfbauer, and A. Bezama Atmospheric emissions modeling of energetic biomass alternatives using system dynamics approach Atmos Environ 42 2008 403 414
63. 2 emissions with a global land use and energy model Appl Energy 66 2000 325 337
64. M Brander, R Tipper, C Hutchison, and G. Davis Consequential and attributional approaches to LCA: a guide to policy makers with specific reference to greenhouse gas LCA of biofuels 2009 Ecometrica Edinburgh, UK 14
65. M Baitz, J Kreissig, and M. Wolf Method for integrating land use into life-cycle-assessment (LCA) Forstwiss Centralbl 119 2000 128 149
66. F Brentrup, J Kusters, H Kuhlmann, and J. Lammel Environmental impact assessment of agricultural production systems using the life cycle assessment methodology: I. Theoretical concept of a LCA method tailored to crop production Eur J Agron 20 2004 247 264
67. LMI Canals, R Muller-Wenk, C Bauer, J Depestele, A Dubreuil, and RF Knuchel Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment within LCA Int J Life Cycle Assess 12 2007 2 4
68. E Gnansounou, A Dauriat, J Villegas, and L. Panichelli Life cycle assessment of biofuels: energy and greenhouse gas balances Bioresour Technol 100 2009 4919 4930
69. ED. Larson A review of life-cycle analysis studies on liquid biofuel systems for the transport sector Energy Sustainable Dev 10 2006 109 126
70. F. Cherubini GHG balances of bioenergy systems - overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns Renewable Energy 35 2009 1565 1573
71. J Malça, and F. Freire Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: a review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev 15 2010 338 351
72. ST Sanchez, J Woods, M Akhurst, M Brander, M O'Hare, and TP Dawson Accounting for indirect land-use change in the life cycle assessment of biofuel supply chains J R Soc Interface 2012
73. RH Beach, and BA. McCarl U.S. agricultural and forestry impacts of the energy independence and security act: FASOM results and model description 2010 Research Triangle Institute (RTI) International Washington, DC 178
74. BRDB. Increasing feedstock production for biofuels: economic drivers, environmental implications, and the role of research. In: Biomass research and development initiative (BR&Di), editor.: The Biomass Research and Development Board (BRDB); 2008. p. 197. Available from: 〈http://www.usbiomassboard.gov/pdfs/increasing-feedstock-revised.pdf〉.
75. Burniaux J-M, Truong TP. GTAP-E: an energy-environmental version of the GTAP model. GTAP technical paper. West Lafayette, IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2002. p. 69.
76. Reilly JM, Paltsev S. Biomass energy and competition for land. GTAP working paper-joint program on the science and policy of global change. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology; 2008. p. 23.
77. Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Tyner WE, Beckman JF, Birur DK. Biofuels and their by-products: global economic and environmental implications. GTAP working paper. West Lafayette IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2008. p. 28.
78. Birur DK, Hertel TW, Tyner WE. Impact of biofuel production on world agricultural markets: a computable general equilibrium analysis. GTAP working paper. West Lafayette IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2008. p. 63.
79. Alla G, Hertel TW, Rose S, Sohngen B. Biofuels mandates, land use and global greenhouse gas emissions. In: 11th annual conference on global economic analysis. Helsinki, Finland: GTAP; 2008.
80. W Britz, and TW. Hertel Impacts of EU biofuels directives on global markets and EU environmental quality: an integrated PE, global CGE analysis Agric Ecosyst Environ 142 2011 102 109
81. Hertel TW, Tyner WE, Birur DK. Biofuels for all? Understanding the global impacts of multinational mandates. GTAP working paper. West Lafayette IN: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2008. p. 48.
82. Tabeau A, Banse M, Woltjer G, van Meijl H. Impact of the EU biofuels directive on the EU food supply chain. In: 113th EAAE seminar "a resilient European food industry and food chain in a challenging world". Chania, Crete, Greece: EAAE; 2009.
83. M Banse, H van Meijl, A Tabeau, G. Woltjer, and EU Will biofuel policies affect global agricultural markets? Eur Rev Agric Econ 35 2008 117 141
84. EPA Renewable fuel standard program: (RFS2) regulatory impact analysis 2010 Assessment and Standards Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC 1107
85. F Hellmann, and PH. Verburg Impact assessment of the European biofuel directive on land use and biodiversity J Environ Manage 91 2010 1389 1396
86. A Gurgel, JM Reilly, and S. Paltsev Potential land use implications of a global biofuels industry J Agric Food Ind Organ 2007 5 (Article 9)
87. Havlík P, Schneider UA, Schmid E, Böttcher H, Kindermann G, Leduc S, et al. GHG mitigation through bioenergy production versus carbon sinks enhancement: a quantitative analysis. Climate change: global risks, challenges & decisions. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen; 2009.
88. APAC The POLYSYS modeling framework: a documentation (Available from) 2012 University of Tennesse - Institute of Agriculture - Agricultural Policy Analysis Center (APAC) Knoxville, Tennessee 169 〈http://www.agpolicy.org/tools/doccom.pdf〉
89. LEI (Report to the GTAP advisory board) 2011 Agricultural Economic Research Institute (LEI) - Wageningen University 6
90. M Banse, H van Meijl, A Tabeau, and G. Woltjer Impact of EU biofuel policies on world agricultural and food markets 2007 Agricultural Economics Research Institute (LEI) The Hague 29
91. Banse M, van Meijl H, Woltjer G. The impact of first and second generation biofuels on global agricultural production, In: Trade and land use. 11th annual conference on global economic analysis,. Helsinki, Finland: GTAP; 2008.
92. D. Koplow State and federal subsidies to biofuels: magnitude and options for redirection Int J Biotechnol 11 2009 92 126
93. R Gecan, and R. Johansson Using biofuel tax credits to achieve energy and environmental policy goals 2010 Congress of the United States-Congressional Budget Office 28
94. Kutas G, Lindberg C, Steenblik R. Biofuels - at what cost? Government support for ethanol and biodiesel in the European Union. In: OECD, editor.: The Global Subsidies Initiative (GSI); 2007. p. 114.
95. A Ignaciuk, F Vohringer, A Ruijs, and EC. van Ierland Competition between biomass and food production in the presence of energy policies: a partial equilibrium analysis Energy Policy 34 2006 1127 1138
96. AA Powell, and FHG Gruen The constant elasticity of transformation production frontier and linear supply system Int Econc Rev 9 1968 315 328
97. R Darwin, M Tsigas, J Lewandrowski, and A. Raneses Land use and cover in ecological economics Ecol Econ 17 1996 157 181
98. R. Darwin FARM: a global framework for integrated land use/cover modeling 1998 CRES, ANU Canberra 18
99. Ronneberger K, Schneider UA, Tol RSJ. KLUM: a simple model of global agricultural land use as a coupling tool of economy and vegetation. Working papers FNU-65 research unit sustainability and global change, Hamburg University; 2005.
100. Malczynski LA, Ellison J, Taylor RA. Biofuels deployment model for modeling time-evolution of ethanol production in the U.S. In: International conference of the systems dynamics society. Albuquerque, New Mexico, US: Systems Dynamics Society; 2009.
101. West T, Dunphy-Guzman K, Sun A, Malczynski L, Reichmuth D, Larson R, et al. Feasibility, economics, and environmental impact of producing 90 billion gallons of ethanol per year by 2030. In: White paper, editor. Livermore, CA: Sadia National Laboratories; 2009. p. 30.
102. Hertel TW, Rose S, Tol RSJ. Land use in computable general equilibrium models: an overview. GTAP working paper GTAP; 2008.
103. Golub A, Hertel TW, Sohngen B. Land use modeling in recursively-dynamic GTAP framework. GTAP working paper: GTAP; 2008.
104. D. van der Mensbrugghe LINKAGE technical reference document 2005 The World Bank Mimeo. Washington, DC
105. Edwards R, Mulligan D, Marelli L. Comparison of models and results for marginal biofuels production from different feedstocks. Indirect land use change from increased biofuels demand. Brussels; 2010.
106. P Al-Riffai, B Dimaranan, and D. Laborde Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate (ATLAS Consortium) 2010 IFPRI Washington, DC
107. AK Braimoh, and T. Onishi Geostatistical techniques for incorporating spatial correlation into land use change models Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 9 2007 438 446
108. APD Aguiar, G Câmara, and MIS. Escada Spatial statistical analysis of land-use determinants in the Brazilian Amazonia: exploring intra-regional heterogeneity Ecol Modell 209 2007 169 188
109. PH Verburg, GHJ de Koning, K Kok, A Veldkamp, and J. Bouma A spatial explicit allocation procedure for modelling the pattern of land use change based upon actual land use Ecol Modell 116 1999 45 61
110. M Batty, Y Xie, and Z. Sun Modeling urban dynamics through GIS-based cellular automata Comput Environ Urban Syst 23 1999 205 233
111. BC Pijanowski, DG Brown, BA Shellito, and GA. Manik Using neural networks and GIS to forecast land use changes: a land transformation model Comput Environ Urban Syst 26 2002 553 575
112. JP Leeuwen, HJP Timmermans, T Osaragi, and Y. Aoki A method for estimating land use transition probability using raster data (Innovations in design & decision support systems in architecture and urban planning) 2006 Springer The Netherlands 69 84
113. E Vega, G Baldi, EG Jobbágy, and J. Paruelo Land use change patterns in the Río de la Plata grasslands: the influence of phytogeographic and political boundaries Agric Ecosyst Environ 134 2009 287 292
114. GHJ de Koning, A Veldkamp, and LO. Fresco Land use in Ecuador: a statistical analysis at different aggregation levels Agric Ecosyst Environ 70 1998 231 247
115. JA Cardille, and JA. Foley Agricultural land-use change in Brazilian Amazonia between 1980 and 1995: evidence from integrated satellite and census data Remote Sens Environ 87 2003 551 562
116. SF de Barros Ferraz, CA Vettorazzi, DM Theobald, and MVR. Ballester Landscape dynamics of Amazonian deforestation between 1984 and 2002 in central Rondonia, Brazil: assessment and future scenarios For Ecol Manage 204 2005 69 85
117. J Kløverpris, H Wenzel, M Banse, L Milà i Canals, and A. Reenberg Conference and workshop on modelling global land use implications in the environmental assessment of biofuels Int J Life Cycle Assess 13 2008 178 183
118. J Kløverpris, H Wenzel, and P. Nielsen Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption: Part 1: Conceptual analysis and methodological proposal Int J Life Cycle Assess 13 2008 13 21
119. JH Kløverpris, K Baltzer, and P. Nielsen Life cycle inventory modelling of land use induced by crop consumption: Part 2: Example of wheat consumption in Brazil, China, Denmark and the USA Int J Life Cycle Assess 15 2010 90 103
120. R Frischknecht, N Jungbluth, H-J Althaus, G Doka, R Dones, and T Heck The ecoinvent database: overview and methodological framework (7 pp) Int J Life Cycle Assess 10 2005 3 9
121. N Jungbluth, M Faist Emmenegger, F Dinkel, O Stettler, G Doka, and M Chudacoff Life cycle inventories of bioenergy. Data v20 2007 Swiss Center for Life Cycle Inventories Uster 727
122. FAPRI. Documentation of the FAPRI modeling system. In: FAPRI-UMC, editor. Report no. 12-04. Park DeVille Drive, Suite E, Columbia: Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute; 2004. p. 238.
123. Winrock The impact of expanding biofuel production on GHG emissions: accessing and interpreting existing data 2009 Winrock International Arlington, VA 72
124. A Veldkamp, and EF. Lambin Predicting land-use change Agric Ecosyst Environ 85 2001 1 6
125. A Veldkamp, and LO. Fresco CLUE: a conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects Ecol Modell 85 1996 253 270
126. A Popp, JP Dietrich, H Lotze-Campen, D Klein, N Bauer, and M Krause The economic potential of bioenergy for climate change mitigation with special attention given to implications for the land system Environ Res Lett 6 2011 034017
127. Golub A, Hertel TW, Lee H-L, Ramankutty N. Modeling land supply and demand in the long run. In: Ninth annual conference on global economic analysis. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Purdue University - McGill University; 2006.
128. Lee HL, Hertel TW, Sohngen B, Ramankutty N. Towards an integrated land use data base for assessing the potential for greenhouse gas mitigation. GTAP technical paper; 2005.
129. Ahammad H, Mi R. Land Use Change Modeling in GTEM: Accounting for forest sinks. EMF 22: Climate Change Control Scenarios. Stanford University, California: Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics; 2005.
130. Ahmed SA, Hertel TW, Lubowski R. Calibration of a land cover supply function using transition probabilities. GTAP research memorandum no. 14. West Lafayette, IN, US: Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University; 2008. p. 9.
131. C Kamusoko, M Aniya, B Adi, and M. Manjoro Rural sustainability under threat in Zimbabwe - simulation of future land use/cover changes in the Bindura district based on the Markov-cellular automata model Appl Geogr 29 2009 435 447
132. E López, G Bocco, M Mendoza, and E. Duhau Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico Landscape Urban Plann 55 2001 271 285
133. Ministry of Agriculture. Brazilian bioenergy plan 2006-2011. In: Secretariat for Production and Agroenergy, editor. Brasília DF: Embrapa; 2006. p. 118.
134. SyCDNA. Ley 26.093: Régimen de Regulación y Promoción para la Producción y Uso Sustentables de Biocombustibles. Buenos Aires: Senado y Cámara de Diputados de la Nación Argentina; 2006. p. 5.
135. Rossetti MD, Hill RR, Johansson B, Dunkin A, Ingalls RG. An agent-based simulation model for the market diffusion of a second generation biofuel. In: Kiesling E, Gunther M, Stummer C, Wakolbinger LM, editors. 2009 Winter simulation conference. Vienna; 2009.
136. LE. Fernandez Linking global and local dynamics: modeling indirect land use change from biofuel demand, global climate & energy project (Expert workshop on biofuels and land-use change. Sao Paulo, Brazil: Round Table on Sustainable Biofuels (RSB) - CGSE-EPFL) 2008 Stanford University
137. Monfreda C, Ramankutty N, Hertel TW. Global agricultural land use data for climate change analysis. GTAP working paper GTAP; 2008.
138. Lee HL, Hertel TW, Rose S, Avetisyan M. An integrated global land use data base for CGE analysis of climate policy options. GTAP working paper: GTAP; 2008.
139. Barr KJ, Babcock BA, Carriquiry M, Nasser A, Harfuch L. Agricultural land elasticities in the United States and Brazil. In: Working paper 10-WP 505, editor. Ames, Iowa: Center for Agricultural and Rural Development-Iowa State University; 2010.
140. S Carballo, and J. Hilbert Propuesta metodologia para la determinación de zonas aptas para la exportación de biodiesel de soja Argentino 2010 INTA Castelar Buenos Aires
141. RA Houghton, and JL. Hackler Carbon flux to the atmosphere from land-use changes: 1850 to 1990 RM Cushman, Carbon dioxide information analysis center - environmental sciences division - Oak Ridge National Laboratory 2001 The Woods Hole Research Center Woods Hole Massachusetts 74
142. IPCC Good practice guidance for land-use, land-use change and forestry 2006 IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme: IPCC
143. Carré F, Hiederer R, Blujdea V, Koeble R. Background guide for the calculation of land carbon stocks in the biofuels sustainability scheme, drawing on the 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. In: JRC reference reports, editor. Ispra (VA), Italy: European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability; 2010. p. 128.
144. 2O emissions (JRC scientific and technical reports) 2010 European Commission, Joint Research Centre Ispra (VA), Italy
145. OECD Agricultural market impacts of future growth in the production of biofuels (Working party on agricultural policies and markets) 2006 OECD, Directorate for Food, Agriculture and Fisheries, Committee for Agriculture Paris, France
146. OECD Biofuel support policies: an economic assessment 2008 OECD Paris, France 146
147. AM Ignaciuk, and RB. Dellink Biomass and multi-product crops for agricultural and energy production - an AGE analysis Energy Econ 28 2006 308 325
148. A Veldkamp, PH Verburg, K Kok, GHJ de Koning, J Priess, and AR. Bergsma The need for scale sensitive approaches in spatially explicit land use change modeling Environ Model Assess 6 2001 111 121
149. R Li, Q Guan, and J. Merchant A geospatial modeling framework for assessing biofuels-related land-use and land-cover change Agric Ecosyst Environ 161 2012 17 26
150. JJ. Sheehan Biofuels and the conundrum of sustainability Curr Opin Biotechnol 20 2009 318 324
151. JD. Sterman Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a complex world 2000 Irwin/McGraw-Hill Boston
152. Beach RH, Adams D, Alig R, Baker J, Latta GS, McCarl BA, et al. Model documentation for the forest and agricultural sector optimization model with greenhouse gases (FASOMGHG). In: US EPA - Environmental Protection Agency - Climate Change Division, editors. Washington, DC: RTI International; 2010. p. 188.
153. J Edmonds, M Wise, H Pitcher, R Richels, T Wigley, and C. Maccracken An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Change 1 1997 311 339
154. M Wise, J Dooley, P Luckow, K Calvin, and P. Kyle Agriculture, land use, energy and carbon emission impacts of global biofuel mandates to mid-century Appl Energy 114 2014 763 773
155. GS Latta, JS Baker, RH Beach, SK Rose, and BA. McCarl A multi-sector intertemporal optimization approach to assess the GHG implications of U.S. forest and agricultural biomass electricity expansion J For Econ 19 2013 361 383
156. G Woltjer, M Banse, H van Meijl, and A. Tabeau Alternative approaches to extend GTAP to biofuel crops (In: 10th annual GTAP conference) 2007 Purdue University Indiana, USA (GTAP)
157. G Woltjer, M Banse, H van Meijl, and A. Tabeau Biofuels and long-term land use dynamics (In: GTAP conference) 2008 GTAP Helsinki, Finland
158. B Bush, D Inman, J Macknick, and S. Peterson System dynamic approach to model land-use change from biofuels (National renewable energy laboratory milestone report) 2012 National Renewable Energy Laboratory Golden, CO
159. M O'Hare, RJ Plevin, JI Martin, AD Jones, A Kendall, and E. Hopson Proper accounting for time increases crop-based biofuels' greenhouse gas deficit versus petroleum Environ Res Lett 4 2009 024001
160. H de Gorter, and Y. Tsur Cost and benefit tests for GHG emissions from biofuel production Eur Rev Agric Econ 37 2010 133 145