Involuntary medication as the intervention of choice: Can this be regarded as'substitution'or as a preventive measure? A prospective cohort study;Effect van dwangmedicatie als interventie van eerste keus op separatie en toegepaste dwang; een prospectief cohortonderzoek

Tijdschrift voor Psychiatrie

Volumn 56, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 640-648

  Verlinde, A A ^a   Snelleman, W ^b   Van Den Berg, H ^b   Noorthoorn, E O ^b  

^a Mediant   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Coercive measures; Dutch Mental Health Act; Involuntary medication; Prevention; Seclusion; Substitution

Indexed keywords

AGGRESSION; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; INVOLUNTARY MEDICATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TIME; EXERCISE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HOSPITAL; MENTAL PATIENT; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT CARE; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

HYPNOTIC SEDATIVE AGENT; NEUROLEPTIC AGENT;

AGGRESSION; ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS; COERCION; COHORT STUDIES; HOSPITALS, PSYCHIATRIC; HUMANS; HYPNOTICS AND SEDATIVES; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTALLY ILL PERSONS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT ADMISSION; PATIENT ISOLATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESTRAINT, PHYSICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908406460     PISSN: 03037339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Abderhalden C, Needham I, Dassen T, Halfens R, Haug HJ. Fisher JE. Structured risk assessment and violence in acute psychiatric wards: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry 2008;193:44-50.
2. Argus. Beknopte omschrijving van de gegevens-set Argus 2010; versie 1.14.
3. Bak M, van Os J, Marcelis M. Acute ingrijpmedicatie; literatuuroverzicht en aanbevelingen.Tijdschr Psychiatr 2011; 53: 727-37
4. Bowers L. The expression and comparison of ward incident rates. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2000: 21:365-74.
5. Bowers L, Brennan G, Flood C, Li pang M, Oladapo P. Preliminary outcomes of a trial to reduce conflict and containment on acute psychiatric wards: City Nurses. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2006; 13: 165-72.
6. Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Wierdsma A. Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion. Psychiatr Q 2011; doi: io.ioo7/sni26-oii-9i78-y.
7. Georgieva I, Mulder CL, Noorthoorn EO. Reducing seclusion through involuntary medication: A randomized clinical trial. Psychiatry Res 2012; doi: 10.1016/j. psychres.2012.08.002.
8. Gudjonsson GH, Rabe-Hesketh S, Szmulker G. Management of psychiatric in patient violence: patient ethnicity and the use of medication restraint and seclusion. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184:258-62.
9. Hoekstra T, Lendemeijer HHGM, Jansen MGMJ. Seclusion: the inside story. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2004; ii: 276-83.
10. Huckshorn KA. Reducing seclusion restraint in mental health use settings: core strategies for prevention. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2004; 42:22-33.
11. Janssen WA, Noorthoorn EO, De Vries WJ, Hutschemaekers GJ, Lendemeijer HHGM, Widdershoven GAM. The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe. Int J Law Psychiatry 2008;31:463-70.
12. Janssen WA Van de Sande R, Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HU, Bowers L, Mulder CUe.a.. Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures. Int J Law Psychiatry 2011; 34:429-38.
13. Janssen WA Noorthoorn EO, Nijman HLI, Bowers L, Hoogendoorn AW, Smit A, e.a. Differences in seclusion rates between admission wards: does patient compilation explain? Psychiatric Q 2012; doi: 10.1007/511126-012-92253.
14. LeBel J. Regulatory change: A pathway to eliminating seclusion and restraint or 'regulatory scotoma'? Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59:194-6.
15. Legemaate J, Frederiks BJM, de Roode RP. Internationale ontwikkelingen. In: Derde evaluatie van de Wet Bopz. Den Haag: ministerie van VWS; 2007.
16. Nagel JEL van der, Tuts KP, Hoekstra T, Noorthoorn EO. Seclusion: the perspective of nurses. Int J Law Psychiatry 2009; 32: 408-12.
17. Noorthoorn EO, Janssen WA, Van de Sande R, Nijman HU, Smit A, Hoogendoorn A, e.a. Vijfjaar argus. Rapportage uitkomsten vrijheidsbeperkende interventies. Hengelo: Esrein;20i2.
18. Noorthoorn EO, Janssen WA, Smit A, Mann P.Van de Sande R.Vruwink FJ.e.a. Drie jaar Argus. Rapportage GGz Nederland. Hengelo: Esrein; 2009.
19. Noorthoorn EO, Janssen WA, Vruwink FJ, Veen RCAde, Lendemeijer HHGM. Eenjaar Argus. Rapportage uitkomsten meting vrijheidsbeperkende maatregelen GGnet en Mediant. Rapportage GGz Nederland. Hengelo: Esrein; 2007.
20. Sande van de R, Nijman HU, Noorthoorn EO, Wierdsma Al, Hellendoorn E, van der Staak C, e.a. Aggression and seclusion on acute psychiatrie wards: effect of short-term risk assessment. Br J Psychiatry 2011;199:473-8.
21. Schippers El, i2juli 2012 brief CZ-3121711. Stand van zaken brief naar aanleiding van AO overleg dwang en drang. Den Haag: ministerie van VWS; 2012.
22. Steinert T, Lepping P, Bernardsgrütter B, Conca A, Hatling T, Janssen W, e.a. Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatrie hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2010; 45: 889-97.
23. Stewart D, Van der Merwe M, Bowers U Simpson A Jones. A review of interventions to reduce mechanical restraint and seclusion among adult psychiatric inpatients. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2010; 31:413-24.
24. Veen RCAde.Vruwink FJ.Voskes Y, Mulder CL, Noorthoorn EO. Het Comfortroom-prqject Mediant. Ervaringen en uitkomsten. MGv 2009; 64:551-60.
25. Veltkamp E, Nijman H, Stoiker JJ, Frigge K, Dries P, Bowers L Patients' preferences for seclusion or forced medication in acute psychiatric emergency in the Netherlands. Psychiatr Serv 2008; 59: 209-11.
26. Vrijland AJ. Van alle tijden en toch uniek. Landelijke nieuwsbrief Dwang & Drang GGz Nederland 2002; 1-2.
27. Vruwink FJ, Mulder CL, Noorthoorn EO, Uitenbroek D, Nijman HLI.The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry 2012; 12:231-2.