Conclusion

Planning by Law and Property Rights Reconsidered

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 219-228

  Needham, Barrie ^a   Hartmann, Thomas ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908389658     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (16)

1. Allmendinger, P. 2002. Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory. Planning Theory, 1(1), 77–99.
2. Arthur, W.B. 1989. Competing technologies increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, (99), 116–131.
3. Baum, H.S. 1977. Toward a post-industrial planning theory. Policy Sciences, 8(4), 401–421.
4. Bertolini, L. 2010. Complex systems, evolutionary planning?, in G. de Roo and E.A. Silva (eds), A Planner's Encounter with Complexity. Farnham: Ashgate, 81–98.
5. Coase, R. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, (3), 1–44.
6. Davy, B. 2005. Bodenpolitik, in by E.-H. Ritter (ed.), Handwörterbuch der Raumordnung (4th edn. Hannover: ARL, 117–130.
7. Elliott, D.L. 2008. A Better Way to Zone: Ten Principles to Create More Liveable Cities. Washington, DC: Island Press.
8. Ellis, R.J. and Thompson, M. (eds) 1997. Culture Matters: Essays in Honor of Aaron Wildavsky. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
9. Etzioni, A. 1967. Mixed scanning --. A. ‘third’ approach to decision-making. Public Administration Review, 27(5), 385–92.
10. Healey, P. 2003. Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123.
11. Hillier, J. 2010. Introduction: Planning at yet another crossroads?, in J. Hillier and P. Healey (eds), The Ashgate Research Companion to Planning Theory. Conceptual Challenges for Spatial Planning. Farnham: Ashgate, 1–34.
12. Mattila, H. 2002. Aesthetic justice and urban planning: Who ought to have the right to design cities? GeoJournal, (58), 131–138.
13. Needham, B. 2006. Planning Law and Economics: The Rules We Make for Using Land. Abingdon: Routledge.
14. Needham, B. 2007 Dutch Land-use Planning. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.
15. Ostrom, E. 2009. Design principles of robust property rights institutions: What have we learned, in G.K. Ingram and Y.-h. Hong (eds), Property Rights and Land Policies. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 25–51.
16. Rittel, H.W. and Webber, M.A. 1973. Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, (4), 155–169.