Approximating dynamic equilibrium conditions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams

Transportation Research Part B: Methodological

Volumn 70, Issue , 2014, Pages 186-200

  Yildirimoglu, Mehmet ^a   Geroliminis, Nikolas ^a  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Dynamic stochastic user equilibrium; Dynamic traffic assignment; Macroscopic fundamental diagram

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRANSPORTATION ROUTES;

DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT(DTA); DYNAMIC TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENTS; HIERARCHICAL STRATEGIES; MACROSCOPIC FUNDAMENTAL DIAGRAM; METHOD OF SUCCESSIVE AVERAGES; ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOR; STOCHASTIC USER EQUILIBRIUM; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT STRATEGIES;

ROUTING ALGORITHMS;

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; STOCHASTICITY; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EID: 84908375032     PISSN: 01912615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2014.09.002     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Aboudolas K., Geroliminis N. Perimeter and boundary flow control in multi-reservoir heterogeneous networks. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 55:265-281.
2. Barceló J., Casas J. Dynamic network simulation with AIMSUN. Simulation Approaches in Transportation Analysis 2005, 57-98. Springer.
3. Ben-Akiva M., De Palma A., Kanaroglou P. Dynamic model of peak period traffic congestion with elastic arrival rates. Transportation Science 1986, 20(3):164-181.
4. Ben-akiva, M., Bierlaire, M., Bottom, J., Koutsopoulos, H., Mishalani, R., 1997. Development Of A Route Guidance Generation System For Real-Time Application, in: Proceedings of the IFAC Transportation Systems Conference, Chania.
5. Buisson C., Ladier C. Exploring the impact of homogeneity of traffic measurements on the existence of macroscopic fundamental diagrams. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2009, 2124(-1):127-136.
6. Cantarella G.E., Improta G., Sforza A. Iterative procedure for equilibrium network traffic signal setting. Transportation Research Part A 1991, 25(5):241-249. ISSN 0191-2607.
7. Chabini I. Discrete dynamic shortest path problems in transportation applications: Complexity and algorithms with optimal run time. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1998, 1645(1):170-175.
8. Chiu, Y.-C., Bottom, J., Mahut, M., Paz, A., Balakrishna, R., Waller, T., Hicks, J., 2011. Dynamic traffic assignment: A primer, Transportation Research E-Circular (E-C153).
9. Daganzo C.F., Sheffi Y. On stochastic models of traffic assignment. Transportation Science 1977, 11(3):253-274.
10. De Palma A., Ben-Akiva M., Lefevre C., Litinas N. Stochastic equilibrium model of peak period traffic congestion. Transportation Science 1983, 17(4):430-453.
11. Dial R.B. A probabilistic multipath traffic assignment model which obviates path enumeration. Transportation Research 1971, 5(2):83-111.
12. Du J., Wong S., Shu C.-W., Xiong T., Zhang M., Choi K. Revisiting Jiang's dynamic continuum model for urban cities. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 56:96-119.
13. Gayah V.V., Daganzo C.F. Clockwise hysteresis loops in the macroscopic fundamental diagram: an effect of network instability. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(4):643-655.
14. Gayah V.V., Dixit V.V. Using mobile probe data and the macroscopic fundamental diagram to estimate network densities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2013, 2390(1):76-86.
15. Geroliminis N., Daganzo C.F. Existence of urban-scale macroscopic fundamental diagrams: some experimental findings. Transportation Research Part B 2008, 42(9):759-770.
16. Geroliminis N., Sun J. Properties of a well-defined macroscopic fundamental diagram for urban traffic. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(3):605-617.
17. Geroliminis N., Haddad J., Ramezani M. Optimal Perimeter control for two urban regions with macroscopic fundamental diagrams: a model predictive approach. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 2013, 14(1):348-359. ISSN 1524-9050. 10.1109/TITS.2012.2216877.
18. Haddad J., Ramezani M., Geroliminis N. Cooperative traffic control of a mixed network with two urban regions and a freeway. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 54:17-36.
19. Hoogendoorn S.P., Bovy P.H. Dynamic user-optimal assignment in continuous time and space. Transportation Research Part B 2004, 38(7):571-592.
20. Jayakrishnan R., Tsai W.K., Chen A. A dynamic traffic assignment model with traffic-flow relationships. Transportation Research Part C 1995, 3(1):51-72.
21. Ji Y., Geroliminis N. On the spatial partitioning of urban transportation networks. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(10):1639-1656.
22. Jiang Y., Wong S., Ho H., Zhang P., Liu R., Sumalee A. A dynamic traffic assignment model for a continuum transportation system. Transportation Research Part B 2011, 45(2):343-363.
23. Ji, Y., Luo, J., Geroliminis, N., in press. Empirical Observations of Congestion Propagation and Dynamic Partitioning with Probe Data for Large-Scale Systems, Transportation Research Record.
24. Keyvan-Ekbatani M., Kouvelas A., Papamichail I., Papageorgiou M. Exploiting the fundamental diagram of urban networks for feedback-based gating. Transportation Research Part B 2012, 46(10):1393-1403.
25. Keyvan-Ekbatani, M., Yildirimoglu, M., Geroliminis, N., Papageorgiou, M., 2013. Traffic Signal Perimeter Control with Multiple Boundaries for Large Urban Networks., in: 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC).
26. Knoop V., Hoogendoorn S., Van Lint J.W. Routing strategies based on macroscopic fundamental diagram. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2012, 2315(1):1-10.
27. Knoop, V.L., Hoogendoorn, S., Van Lint, J. 2013. Impact of Traffic Dynamics on Macroscopic Fundamental Diagram, in: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting.
28. Kuwahara M., Akamatsu T. Decomposition of the reactive dynamic assignments with queues for a many-to-many origin-destination pattern. Transportation Research Part B 1997, 31(1):1-10. ISSN 0191-2615. 10.1016/S0191-2615(96)00020-3.
29. Leclercq L., Geroliminis N. Estimating MFDs in simple networks with route choice. Transportation Research Part B 2013, 57:468-484.
30. Leclercq L., Chiabaut N., Trinquier B. Macroscopic Fundamental Diagrams: a cross-comparison of estimation methods. Transportation Research Part B 2014, 62:1-12.
31. Little J.D. A proof for the queuing formula: L=λW. Operations Research 1961, 9(3):383-387.
32. Lo H.K., Szeto W. A cell-based variational inequality formulation of the dynamic user optimal assignment problem. Transportation Research Part B 2002, 36(5):421-443.
33. Mahmassani H.S., Peeta S. Network performance under system optimal and user equilibrium dynamic assignments: Implications for advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1993, 1408:83-93.
34. Mahmassani H.S., Saberi M., Zockaie A. Urban network gridlock: theory, characteristics, and dynamics. Transportation Research Part C 2013, In Press.
35. Mazloumian A., Geroliminis N., Helbing D., Mazloumian A., Geroliminis N., Helbing D. The spatial variability of vehicle densities as determinant of urban network capacity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 2010, 368(1928):4627-4647.
36. Merchant D.K., Nemhauser G.L. A model and an algorithm for the dynamic traffic assignment problems. Transportation Science 1978, 183-199.
37. Ortigosa J., Menendez M., Tapia H. Study on the number and location of measurement points for an MFD perimeter control scheme: a case study of Zurich. EURO Journal on Transportation and Logistics 2013, 1-22.
38. Papageorgiou M. Dynamic modeling, assignment, and route guidance in traffic networks. Transportation Research Part B 1990, 24(6):471-495. ISSN 0191-2615. 10.1016/0191-2615(90)90041-V.
39. Peeta S., Mahmassani H.S. System optimal and user equilibrium time-dependent traffic assignment in congested networks. Annals of Operations Research 1995, 60(1):81-113.
40. Peeta S., Ziliaskopoulos A.K. Foundations of dynamic traffic assignment: the past, the present and the future. Networks and Spatial Economics 2001, 1(3):233-265.
41. Ran B., Boyce D. Modeling dynamic transportation networks: an intelligent transportation system oriented approach 1996, Springer, ISBN 9783540583608.
42. Ran B., Hall R.W., Boyce D.E. A link-based variational inequality model for dynamic departure time/route choice. Transportation Research Part B 1996, 30(1):31-46. ISSN 0191-2615. 10.1016/0191-2615(95)00010-0.
43. Sheffi Y. Urban Transportation Networks: Equilibrium Analysis with Mathematical Programming Methods 1985, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
44. Yang H., Yagar S. Traffic assignment and signal control in saturated road networks. Transportation Research Part A 1995, 29(2):125-139. ISSN 0965-8564.
45. Ziliaskopoulos A.K. A linear programming model for the single destination system optimum dynamic traffic assignment problem. Transportation Science 2000, 34(1):37-49.