Perceptions of advantages and barriers to radial-access percutaneous coronary intervention in VA cardiac catheterization laboratories

Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine

Volumn 15, Issue 6-7, 2014, Pages 329-333

  Helfrich, Christian D ^a,b   Tsai, Thomas T ^c,d   Rao, Sunil V ^e,f   Lemon, Jaclyn M ^a   Eugenio, Evercita C ^a   Vidovich, Mladen I ^g,h   Shroff, Adhir R ^g,h   Speiser, Bernadette S ^g   Bryson, Chris L ^a,i  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f DUKE CLINICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^g JESSE BROWN VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Dissemination implementation; Health services research; Radial artery; Survey research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CARDIOLOGIST; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HUMAN; LEARNING CURVE; PATIENT COMFORT; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TRANS FEMORAL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; TRANS RADIAL PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMORRHAGE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADIAL ARTERY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; FEMORAL ARTERY; HEMORRHAGE; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RADIAL ARTERY; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908367863     PISSN: 15538389     EISSN: 18780938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rao S., Cohen M., Kandzari D., Bertrand O., Gilchrist I. The transradial approach to percutaneous coronary intervention: historical perspective, current concepts, and future directions. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010, 55:2187-2195.
2. Bertrand O., Bélisle P., Joyal D., Costerousse O., Rao S., Jolly S., et al. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J 2012, 163:632-648.
3. Feldman D., Swaminathan R., Kaltenbach L., Baklanov D., Kim L., Wong S., et al. Adoption of radial access and comparison of outcomes to femoral access in percutaneous coronary intervention: an updated report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (2007-2012). Circulation 2013, 127:2295-2306.
4. Cooper C., El-Shiekh R., Cohen D., Blaesing L., Burket M., Basu A., et al. Effect of transradial access on quality of life and cost of cardiac catheterization: a randomized comparison. Am Heart J 1999, 138:430-436.
5. Caputo R., Tremmel J., Rao S., Gilchrist I., Pyne C., Pancholy S., et al. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2011, 78:823-839.
6. Gutierrez A., Tsai T., Stanislawski M., Vidovich M., Bryson C., Bhatt D., et al. Adoption of transradial PCI and outcomes according to center radial volume in the veterans affairs health system. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2013, 6:336-346.
7. Elgharib N., Shah U., Coppola J. Transradial cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: a review. Coron Artery Dis 2009, 20:487-493.
8. Tremmel J. Launching a successful transradial program. J Invasive Cardiol 2009, 21:3A-10A.
9. Byrd J.B., Vigen R., Plomondon M.E., Rumsfeld J.S., Box T.L., Fihn S.D., et al. Data quality of an electronic health record tool to support va cardiac catheterization laboratory quality improvement: the VA clinical assessment, reporting, and tracking system for cath labs (CART) program. Am Heart J 2013, 165:434-440.
10. Box T., McDonell M., Helfrich C., Jesse R., Fihn S., Rumsfeld J. Strategies from a nationwide health information technology implementation: the VA CART story. J Gen Intern Med 2010, 25(Suppl 1):72-76.
11. Agostoni P., Biondi-Zoccai G., de Benedictis M., Rigattieri S., Turri M., Anselmi M., et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary diagnostic and interventional procedures: systematic overview and meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 44:349-356.
12. Kiemeneij F., Laarman G., Odekerken D., Slagboom T., van der Wieken R. A randomized comparison of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty by the radial, brachial and femoral approaches: the access study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997, 29:1269-1275.
13. Goldberg S., Renslo R., Sinow R., French W. Learning curve in the use of the radial artery as vascular access in the performance of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1998, 44:147-152.
14. Louvard Y., Lefevre T., Morice M. Radial approach: what about the learning curve?. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn 1997, 42:467-468.
15. Jolly S., Cairns J., Niemela K., Steg P., Natarajan M., Cheema A., et al. Effect of radial versus femoral access on radiation dose and the importance of procedural volume: a substudy of the multicenter randomized rival trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2013, 6:258-266.
16. Lo T., Ratib K., Chong A., Bhatia G., Gunning M., Nolan J. Impact of access site selection and operator expertise on radiation exposure; a controlled prospective study. Am Heart J 2012, 164:455-461.
17. Jolly S., Yusuf S., Cairns J., Niemela K., Xavier D., Widimsky P., et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet 2011, 377:1409-1420.
18. Rao S., Ou F., Wang T., Roe M., Brindis R., Rumsfeld J., et al. Trends in the prevalence and outcomes of radial and femoral approaches to percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2008, 1:379-386.
19. Hess C.N., Peterson E.D., Neely M.L., Dai D., Hillegass W.B., Krucoff M.W., et al. The learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary intervention among operators in the United States: a study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry (r). Circulation 2014, 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.006356.
20. Rao S.V., Krucoff M.W. Radial first: paradox+proficiency=opportunity. J Am Heart Assoc 2013, 2:e000281. [5].
21. Bradley E., Curry L., Webster T., Mattera J., Roumanis S., Radford M., et al. Achieving rapid door-to-balloon times: how top hospitals improve complex clinical systems. Circulation 2006, 113:1079-1085.
22. Bradley E., Holmboe E., Mattera J., Roumanis S., Radford M., Krumholz H. A qualitative study of increasing beta-blocker use after myocardial infarction: why do some hospitals succeed?. JAMA 2001, 285:2604-2611.
23. Bradley E., Roumanis S., Radford M., Webster T., McNamara R., Mattera J., et al. Achieving door-to-balloon times that meet quality guidelines: how do successful hospitals do it?. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005, 46:1236-1241.
24. Edmondson A. Speaking up in the operating room: how team leaders promote learning in interdisciplinary action teams. J Manag Stud 2003, 40:1419-1452.