Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: Process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India

BMC Research Notes

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Boisson, Sophie ^a   Sosai, Peppin ^b   Ray, Shubajyoti ^b   Routray, Parimita ^a   Torondel, Belen ^a   Schmidt, Wolf Peter ^a   Bhanja, Bishakha ^c   Clasen, Thomas ^a,d  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b XAVIER INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT   (India)

^c WATERAID   (United Kingdom)

^d EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cluster randomised trial; Process evaluation; Sanitation; Total Sanitation Campaign

Indexed keywords

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY SIZE; HUMAN; INDIA; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RURAL POPULATION; SANITATION; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TIME;

DEFECATION; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INDIA; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RURAL POPULATION; SANITATION; TIME FACTORS; TOILET FACILITIES;

EID: 84908355000     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17560500     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-486     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. WHO/UNICEF, Progress on Sanitation and Drinking-Water: 2013 Update Geneva: WHO 2013
2. Pruss-Unstun A, Bos R, Gore F, Bartram J, Safer water, better health: costs, benefitsandsustainability of interventions to protect and promote health Geneva: World Health Organization 2008
3. Interventions to improve disposal of human excreta for preventing diarrhoea. Clasen TF, Bostoen K, Schmidt WP, Boisson S, Fung IC, Jenkins MW, Scott B, Sugden S, Cairncross S, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 6 D007180
4. Effect of sanitation on soil-transmitted helminth infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ziegelbauer K, Speich B, Mausezahl D, Bos R, Keiser J, Utzinger J, PLoS Med 2012 9 1001162
5. Interventions to improve water quality and supply, sanitation and hygiene practices, and their effects on the nutritional status of children. Dangour AD, Watson L, Cumming O, Boisson S, Che Y, Velleman Y, Cavill S, Allen E, Uauy R, Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013 8 CD009382
6. The effect of improved rural sanitation on diarrhoea and helminth infection: design of a cluster-randomized trial in Orissa, India. Clasen T, Boisson S, Routray P, Cumming O, Jenkins M, Ensink JH, Bell M, Freeman MC, Peppin S, Schmidt WP, Emerg Themes Epidemiol 2012 9 7
7. Government of India, Central Rural Sanitation Programme Total Sanitation Campaign Ministry of Rural Development: Department of Drinking Water Supply 2007 Available: http://indiasanitationportal.org/sites/default/files/TSC%20-%20Guidelines.pdf
8. Process evaluation in randomised controlled trials of complex interventions. Oakley A, Strange V, Bonell C, Allen E, Stephenson J, BMJ 2006 332 413 6
9. Wight DOA, Effective sexual health interventions: issues in experimental evaluation Oxford: Oxford University Press, Stephenson IJ, Bonell C, 2002 151 66
10. Linnan L, Steckler A, Process evaluation and public health interventions: An overview. In Process Evaluation in Public Health Interventions and Research, 1-23 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers 2002
11. Puri-Fact Sheet. Government of India, District Level Household and Facility survey (DLHFS-3) Mumbai: International Institute for Population Science 2008
12. Government of India Ministry for Drinking Water and Sanitation, Guidelines on Nirmal Bharat Abhiyan (NBA) 2012 Available: http://www.mdws.gov.in/sites/upload-files/ddws/files/pdfs/Final%20Guidelines%20(English).pdf
13. Shame or subsidy revisited: social mobilization for sanitation in Orissa, India. Pattanayak SK, Yang JC, Dickinson KL, Poulos C, Patil SR, Mallick RK, Blitstein JL, Praharaj P, Bull World Health Organ 2009 87 580 7
14. Causal inference methods to study nonrandomized, preexisting development interventions. Arnold BF, Khush RS, Ramaswamy P, London AG, Rajkumar P, Ramaprabha P, Durairaj N, Hubbard AE, Balakrishnan K, Colford JM Jr, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010 107 22605 10
15. WaterAid, Feeling the Pulse: A Study of the Total Sanitation Campaign in Five States 2008
16. Impact of Indian Total Sanitation Campaign on latrine coverage and use: a cross-sectional study in Orissa three years following programme implementation. Barnard S, Routray P, Majorin F, Peletz R, Boisson S, Sinha A, Clasen T, PLoS One 2013 8 71438
17. Assessment of village water and sanitation committee in a district of Tamil Nadu, India. Ganesh SR, Kumar SG, Sarkar S, Kar SS, Roy G, Premarajan KC, Indian J Public Health 2013 57 43 6
18. TARU/UNICEF, Impact Assessment of Nirmal Gram Puraskar Awarded Panchayats Final: Report 2008
19. Evidence of behaviour change following a hygiene promotion programme in Burkina Faso. Curtis V, Kanki B, Cousens S, Diallo I, Kpozehouen A, Sangare M, Nikiema M, Bull World Health Organ 2001 79 518 27
20. The effect of a soap promotion and hygiene education campaign on handwashing behaviour in rural India: a cluster randomised trial. Biran A, Schmidt WP, Wright R, Jones T, Seshadri M, Isaac P, Nathan NA, Hall P, McKenna J, Granger S, Bidinger P, Curtis V, Trop Med Int Health 2009 14 1303 14
21. International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and Macro International, National Family Health Survey (NFHS-3), 2005-06: India: Volume I Mumbai: IIPS 2005-06