Vineyard yield estimation by automatic 3D bunch modelling in field conditions

Computers and Electronics in Agriculture

Volumn 110, Issue , 2015, Pages 17-26

  Herrero Huerta, Mónica ^a   González Aguilera, Diego ^a   Rodriguez Gonzalvez, Pablo ^a   Hernández López, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Automation; Computer vision; Non invasive technologies; Photogrammetry; Vitis vinifera L.; Yield estimation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; COMPUTER VISION; DATA ACQUISITION; FRUITS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; PRODUCTIVITY;

CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY; COMPREHENSIVE ANALYSIS; ESTIMATION PARAMETERS; NON-INVASIVE TECHNOLOGY; OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENTS; PROACTIVE MANAGEMENT; VITIS VINIFERA L; YIELD ESTIMATION;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA ACQUISITION; FIELD LAYER; LABORATORY METHOD; NEW RECORD; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SOFTWARE; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING; VINEYARD; YIELD RESPONSE;

VITIS VINIFERA;

EID: 84908348456     PISSN: 01681699     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2014.10.003     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Aguilar M.A., Pozo J.L., Aguilar F.J., Sanchez-Hermosilla J., Páez F.C., Negreiros J. 3D surface modelling of tomato plants using close-range photogrammetry. Int. Archives Photogr., Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2008, 330.
2. Akca D., Gruen A. Generalized Least Squares Multiple 3D Surface Matching 2007, Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry, ETH Zurich.
3. Attene M. A lightweight approach to repairing digitized polygon meshes. Visual Comput. 2010, 26(11):1393-1406.
4. Barber C.B., Dobkin D.P., Huhdanpaa H. The quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Transact. Math. Software (TOMS) 1996, 22(4):469-483.
5. Barequet, G., Kumar, S., 1997. Repairing CAD models. In: Visualization'97, Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 363-370.
6. Barequet G., Sharir M. Filling gaps in the boundary of a polyhedron. Comput. Aided Geom. Des. 1995, 12(2):207-229.
7. Battany, M., 2008. A practical method for counting berries based on image analysis. In: 2nd Annual National Viticulture Research Conference, University of California, Davis, USA, 4-5, July 9-11.
8. Bay H., Tuytelaars T., Van Gool L. Surf: speeded up robust features. Computer Vision-ECCV 200 2006, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 404-417.
9. Besl P.J., Jain R.C. Segmentation through variable-order surface fitting. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell., IEEE Trans. on 1988, 10(2):167-192.
10. Blom P.E., Tarara J.M. Trellis tension monitoring improves yield estimation in vineyards. HortScience 2009, 44(3):678-685.
11. Bøhn, J.H., Wozny, M.J., 1992. Automatic CAD-model repair: shell-closure. In: Proc. Symp. on Solid Freeform Fabrication, pp. 86-94.
12. Branch D., Dang L.C., Hall N., Ketchum W., Melakayil M., Parrent J., Baron E. Comparative direct analysis of type Ia supernova spectra. II. Maximum light. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2006, 118(842):560-571.
13. Chherawala Y., Lepage R., Doyon G. In food grading/sorting based on color appearance trough machine vision: the case of fresh cranberries. Informat. Commun. Technol. 2006, 1540-1545. ICTTA '06. 2nd, 0-0 0.
14. Clingeleffer P.R., Martin S., Krstic M., Dunn G.M. Crop development, crop estimation and crop control to secure quality and production of major wine grape varieties: a national approach: final report to grape and wine research development corporation 2001, Grape and Wine Research & Development Corporation.
15. DeLuca J.G., Gall W.E., Ciferri C., Cimini D., Musacchio A., Salmon E. Kinetochore microtubule dynamics and attachment stability are regulated by Hec1. Cell 2006, 127(5):969-982.
16. Deseilligny, M.P., Clery, I., 2011. Apero, an open source bundle adjustment software for automatic calibration and orientation of set of images. In: Proceedings of the ISPRS Symposium, 3DARCH11, pp. 269-277.
17. Desolneux A., Moisan L., Morel J.M. Meaningful alignments. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2000, 40(1):7-23.
18. Diago M.-P., Correa C., Millán B., Barreiro P., Valero C., Tardaguila J. Grapevine yield and leaf area estimation using supervised classification methodology on RGB images taken under field conditions. Sensors 2012, 12:16988-17006.
19. Djuricic, A., Weinmann, M., Jutzi, B., 2014. Potentials of small, lightweight and low cost multi-echo laser scanners for detecting grape berries. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. XL-5, 2014. In: ISPRS Technical Commission V Symposium, 23-25 June 2014, Riva del Garda, Italy.
20. Dolenc, A., Makela, I., 1993. Some efficient procedures for correcting triangulated models. In: Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 126-134.
21. Dunn G.M., Martin S.R. The current status of crop forecasting in the Australian wine industry. ASVO Seminar Series: Grapegrowing at the Edge 2003, 24.
22. Dunn G.M., Martin S.R. Yield prediction from digital image analysis: a technique with potential for vineyard assessments prior to harvest. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2004, 10(3):196-198.
23. Fan Y.Z., Tam B.S., Zhou J. Maximizing spectral radius of unoriented Laplacian matrix over bicyclic graphs of a given order. Linear and Multilinear Algebra 2008, 56(4):381-397.
24. Fischler M.A., Bolles R.C. Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Commun. ACM 1981, 24(6):381-395.
25. Golias N.A., Dutton R.W. Delaunay triangulation and 3D adaptive mesh generation. Finite elements Anal. Des. 1997, 25(3):331-341.
26. Gonzalez-Aguilera D., Del Pozo S., Lopez G., Rodriguez-Gonzalvez P. From point cloud to CAD models: Laser and optics geotechnology for the design of electrical substations. Opt. Laser Technol. 2012, 44(5):1384-1392.
27. González-Aguilera, D., Guerrero, D., Hernández-López, D., Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P., Pierrot, M., Fernández-Hernández, J., 2013. PW, Photogrammetry Workbench. (accessed 30.04.14). http://www.isprs.org/catcon/catcon6.aspx.
28. Greven M. Manual for yield forecasting in Sauvignon Blanc grapes. Marlborough Wine Research Centre 2007.
29. Gruen A. Adaptive least squares correlation: a powerful image matching technique. South African J. Photogr., Remote Sens. Cartogr. 1985, 14(3):175-187.
30. Guskov, I., Wood, Z.J., 2001. Topological noise removal. In: 2001 Graphics Interface Proceedings. Ottawa, Canada, 19.
31. Hartley R., Zisserman A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision 2003, Cambridge University Press.
32. Herrero Langreo, A., Barreiro Elorza, P., Santamaria, D., Paz, M., Baluja, J., Ochagavia, H., 2010. Pixel classification through mahalanobis distance for identification of grapevine canopy elements on rgb images.
33. Hirschmuller, H., 2005. Accurate and efficient stereo processing by semi-global matching and mutual information. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. CVPR 2005. In: IEEE Computer Society Conference on, vol. 2, pp. 807-814.
34. Joglekar J., Gedam S.S. Area based image matching methods-a survey. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2012, 2:130-136.
35. Kraus K. Photogr. Fundamentals Standard Processes 1993, vol. 1. DummlersVerlag, Bonn, Germany, ISBN 3-427-78684-6.
36. Kurtural K., Ó.Daniel B. Crop estimation in vineyards. UK Cooperat. Extens. Service Univ. Kentucky-College Agric. 2007, 45.
37. Lange, B., Chang, C., Suma, E., Newman, B., Rizzo, A.S., Bolas, M., 2011. Development and evaluation of low cost game-based balance rehabilitation tool using the microsoftkinect sensor. Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC, In: 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE, pp. 1831-1834.
38. Longuet-Higgins H.C. A computer algorithm for reconstructing a scene from two projections. Readings in Computer Vision: Issues, Problems, Principles, and Paradigms 1987, 61-62. M.A. Fischler, O. Firschein (Eds.).
39. Lowe, D., 1999. Object recognition from local scale-invariant features. In: International Conference on Computer Vision, Corfu, Greece.
40. Lowe D.G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2004, 60(2):91-110.
41. Lumme J., Karjalainen M., Kaartinen H., Kukko A., Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H., et al. Terrestrial laser scanning of agricultural crops. Int. Archives Photogr., Remote Sens. Spatial Informat. Sci. 2008, 37:563-566.
42. Martin S., Dunstone R., Dunn G. How to Forecast Wine Grape Deliveries Using Grape Forecaster Excel Workbook Version 7 2003, GWRDC, Adelaide, Australia, p. 100.
43. Matas J., Chum O., Urban M., Pajdla T. Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. Image Vis. Comput. 2004, 22(10):761-767.
44. Moisan L., Stival B. A probabilistic criterion to detect rigid point matches between two images and estimate the fundamental matrix. Int. J. Comput. Vision 2004, 57(3):201-218.
45. Moisan L., Moulon P., Monasse P. Automatic homographic registration of a pair of images, with a contrario elimination of outliers. Image Processing On Line 2012, 10.
46. Morel J.M., Yu G. ASIFT: a new framework for fully affine invariant image comparison. SIAM J. Imag. Sci. 2009, 2(2):438-469.
47. Mosteller F., Tukey J. Data Analysis and Regression 1977, Addison-Wesley, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
48. Nuske, S., Achar, S., Bates, T., Narasimhan, S., Singh, S., 2011. Yield estimation in vineyards by visual grape detection. Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). In: 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, pp. 2352-2358.
49. Nuske S., Gupta K., Narasimhan S., Singh S. Modeling and Calibrating Visual Yield Estimates in Vineyards. Field and Service Robotics 2012, vol. 92:343-356. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg. K. Yoshida, S. Tadokoro (Eds.).
50. O'Rourke J. Computational Geometry 1994, C. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, p. 118.
51. Pope, A.J., 1976. The statistics of residuals and the detection of outliers.
52. Quan L. Image-Based Modeling 2010, Springer, New York.
53. Roby G., Harbertson J.F., Adams D.A., Matthews M.A. Berry size and vine water deficits as factors in winegrape composition: anthocyanins and tannins. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 2004, 10(2):100-107.
54. Rock, S.J., Wozny, M.J., 1992. Generating topological information from a bucket of facets. In: Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium Proceedings. The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, pp. 251-259.
55. Romero I., García-Escudero E., Martín I. Effects of leaf position on blade and petiole mineral nutrient concentration of Tempranillo grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Am. J. Enol. Viticulture 2010, 61(4):544-550.
56. Sachs L. Applied Statistics: A Handbook of Techniques 1984, Springer-Verlag, New York, p. 253.
57. Serrano L., González-Flor C., Gorchs G. Assessment of grape yield and composition using the reflectance based water index in Mediterranean rained vineyards. Remote Sens. Environ. 2012, 118:249-258.
58. Sethian J.A. Level Set Methods and Fast Marching Methods: Evolving Interfaces in Computational Geometry, Fluid Mechanics, Computer Vision, and Materials Science 1999, vol. 3. Cambridge University Press.
59. Smith S.M., Brady J.M. SUSAN-a new approach to low level image processing. Int. J. Comput. Vision 1997, 23(1):45-78.
60. Varnuška, M., Parus, J., Kolingerová, I., 2005. Simple holes triangulation in surface reconstruction. In: Proceedings of ALGORITMY, pp. 280-289.
61. Vicente Renedo, T., Martínez García, J., Chavarri, J.B., Marín, M., González Marcano, S., Domínguez Miguel, N., Villar Capellán, R., 2007. Preservation of genetic heritage of authorized vinifera grapes and rootstocks in Rioja DOC [Designation of Origin]. In: Foro Mundial del Vino, 5, Logroño (España), 28-30 Mar 2006. GLR, CAGDR.
62. Wang J., Gu D., Yu Z., Tan C., Zhou L. A framework for 3D model reconstruction in reverse engineering. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2012, 63(4):1189-1200.
63. Whalley, J., Shanmuganathan, S., 2013. In Applications of image processing in viticulture: A review. In: 20th International Congress on Modelling and Simulation, Adelaide, Australia, pp. 531-537.
64. Wolpert J., Vilas E. Estimating vineyard yields: introduction to a simple, two-step method. Am. J. Enol. Viticul. 1992, 43(4):384-388.