Exploring the persuasiveness of behavior change support strategies and possible gender differences

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1153, Issue , 2014, Pages 41-57

  Orji, Rita ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Behavior change; Gender; Health; Health behavior; Health intervention; Mhealth; Persuasive strategies; Persuasive technology; Persuasiveness; PSD

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

BEHAVIOR CHANGE; GENDER; HEALTH BEHAVIORS; HEALTH INTERVENTIONS; MHEALTH; PERSUASIVE STRATEGIES; PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY; PERSUASIVENESS; PSD;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84908300665     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (35)

1. Bang, M., Torstensson, C., and Katzeff, C. The PowerHhouse: A Persuasive Computer Game Designed to Raise Awareness of Domestic Energy Consumption. Persuasive Technology, (2006), 123-132.
2. Berkovsky, S., Freyne, J., and Oinas-kukkonen, H. Influencing Individually. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2, 2(2012), 1-8.
3. Brown, B., Chetty, M., Grimes, A., and Harmon, E. Reflecting on health: a system for students to monitor diet and exercise. CHI'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2006), 1807-1812.
4. Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., and D, G. S. Amazon's Mechanical Turk A New Source of Inexpensive, Yet High-Quality, Data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6, 1(2011), 3-5.
5. Colineau, N. and Paris, C. Can Beneficial Habits Be Induced through Reflection ? Workshop on User Models and Motivational Systems: the effective and the rational routes to persuasion, with UMAP' 2010.,.
6. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., and Landay, J. A. Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behavior change in everyday life. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2009), 405-414.
7. Dawson, K. a, Schneider, M. a, Fletcher, P. C., and Bryden, P. J. Examining gender differences in the health behaviors of Canadian university students. The Journal of the Royal Society for the Promotion of Health 127, 1(2007), 38-44.
8. Drozd, F., Lehto, T., and Oinas-Kukkonen, H. Exploring perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system: a structural model. Persuasive Technology., (2012), 157-168.
9. Fogg, B. J. Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, 2003.
10. Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. Pay Enough or Don't Pay at All∗. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115, 3(2000), 791-810.
11. Grimes, A., Kantroo, V., and Grinter, R. E. Let's play!: mobile health games for adults. Proceedings of the 12th {ACM} International Conference on Ubiquitous computing, ACM (2010), 241-250.
12. Halko, S. and Kientz, J. Personality and Persuasive Technology: An Exploratory Study on Health-Promoting Mobile Applications. Persuasive Technology, (2010), 150-161.
13. Harjumaa, M. Understanding persuasive software functionality in practice: a field trial of polar FT60. Persuasive Technology, (2009).
14. Kaptein, M., Duplinsky, S., and Markopoulos, P. Means based adaptive persuasive systems. Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (2011), 335.
15. Kaptein, M., De Ruyter, B., Markopoulos, P., and Aarts, E. Adaptive Persuasive Systems. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems 2, 2(2012), 1-25.
16. Lau, D. C. W., Douketis, J. D., Morrison, K. M., Hramiak, I. M., Sharma, A. M., and Ur, E. 2006 Canadian clinical practice guidelines on the management and prevention of obesity in adults and children [summary]. CMAJ: Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne 176, 8(2007), S1-13.
17. Lehto, T. and Oinas-kukkonen, H. Persuasive Features in Six Weight Loss Websites: A Qualitative Evaluation. (2010), 162-173.
18. Lelie, C. The value of storyboards in the product design process. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10, 2-3(2005), 159-162.
19. Mason, W. and Suri, S. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods 44, 1(2012), 1-23.
20. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems. Persuasive Technology, (2008), 164-176.
21. Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M. Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 24, 1(2009), 28.
22. Orji, R., Mandryk, R. L., Vassileva, J., and Gerling, K. M. Tailoring persuasive health games to gamer type. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI'13, ACM Press (2013), 2467-2476.
23. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., and Mandryk, R. Towards an effective health interventions design: an extension of the health belief model. Online journal of public health informatics 4, 3 (2012).
24. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., and Mandryk, R. L. Modeling the Efficacy of Persuasive Strategies for Different Gamer Types in Serious Games for Health. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction: Special Issue on Personalization and Behaviour Change,.
25. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., and Mandryk, R. L. Lunch Time: a slow-casual game for long-term dietary behavior change. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (2012), 10.1007/s00779-012-0590-6.
26. Orji, R. O., Vassileva, J., and Mandryk, R. L. Modeling Gender Differences in Healthy Eating Determinants for Persuasive Intervention Design. Persuasive Technology 7822, (2013), 161-173.
27. Sundar, S. S., Bellur, S., and Jia, H. Motivational Technologies: A Theoretical Framework for Desiging Preventive Health Application. Persuasive technology 7284, (2012), 112-122.
28. Sundar, S. S. and Marathe, S. S. Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage. Human Communication Research 36, 3(2010), 298-322.
29. Sundar, S. S. and Marathe, S. S. Personalization versus Customization: The Importance of Agency, Privacy, and Power Usage. Human Communication Research 36, 3(2010), 298-322.
30. Toscos, T., Faber, A., An, S., and Gandhi, M. P. Chick clique: persuasive technology to motivate teenage girls to exercise. {CHI}'06 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems, ACM (2006), 1873-1878.
31. Truong, K., Hayes, G., and Abowd, G. Storyboarding: an empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. DIS, (2006), 12-21.
32. Tsai, C. C., Lee, G., Raab, F., et al. Usability and Feasibility of PmEB: A Mobile Phone Application for Monitoring Real Time Caloric Balance. Mobile Networks and Applications 12, 2-3(2007), 173-184.
33. Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., and Janssen, D. P. Gender differences in cooperation and competition: the male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological science 18, 1(2007), 19-23.
34. Wansink, B. Mindless Eating: Why We Eat More Than We Think. Bantam, 2006.
35. Wiafe, I. and Nakata, K. Bibliographic Analysis of Persuasive Systems: Techniques, Methods and Domains of Application. Persuasive Technology, (2012), 61-64.