Biomarkers of myocardial injury with different energy sources for atrial fibrillation catheter ablation

Cardiology Journal

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 516-523

  Casella, Michela ^a   Russo, Antonio Dello ^a   Russo, Eleonora ^a   Al Mohani, Ghaliah ^a   Santangeli, Pasquale ^b   Riva, Stefania ^a   Fassini, Gaetano ^a   Moltrasio, Massimo ^a   Innocenti, Ester ^a   Colombo, Daniele ^a   Bologna, Fabrizio ^a   Izzo, Gennaro ^a   Joseph, G ^b   Biase, Luigi Di ^b   Natale, Andrea ^b   Tondo, Claudio ^a  

^a CENTRO CARDIOLOGICO MONZINO   (Italy)

^b Texas Cardiac Arrhythmia Institute at St David's Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Atrial fibrillation ablation; Cardiac biochemical markers; Cardiac troponin I; Creatinine kinase MB; Myocardial injury

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE MB; TROPONIN I; BIOLOGICAL MARKER; TROPONIN T;

ABLATION CATHETER; ADULT; ARTICLE; CARDIAC MAPPING SYSTEM; CATHETER ABLATION; CATHETER SHEATH; CRYOABLATION; CRYOBALLOON; CRYOBALLOON ABLATION; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GUIDE WIRE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HEART MUSCLE INJURY; HUMAN; INTRACARDIAC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MAPPING CATHETER; OPEN IRRIGATED TIP RF CATHETER WITH CONTACT FORCE SENSING TECHNOLOGY; PULMONARY VEIN ISOLATION; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION DEVICE; TRANSSEPTAL PUNCTURE; VISUALLY GUIDED LASER BALLOON; VISUALLY GUIDED LASER BALLOON ABLATION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BLOOD; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYOSURGERY; FOLLOW UP; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PULMONARY VEIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; BIOMARKERS; CATHETER ABLATION; CREATINE KINASE, MB FORM; CRYOSURGERY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL ISCHEMIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PULMONARY VEINS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TROPONIN I; TROPONIN T;

EID: 84908282362     PISSN: 18975593     EISSN: 1898018X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2013.0153     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med, 1998; 339: 659–666.
2. Mesas CE, Augello G, Lang CC et al. Electroanatomic remode­ling of the left atrium in patients undergoing repeat pulmonary vein ablation: Mechanistic insights and implications for ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2006; 17: 1279–1285.
3. Tang M, Kriatselis C, Nedios S et al. A novel cryoballoon techni­que for mapping and isolating pulmonary veins: A feasibility and efficacy study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2010; 21: 626–631.
4. Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Themistoclakis S et al. Visually-guided bal­loon catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: Experimental feasibi­lity and first-in-human multicenter clinical outcome. Circulation, 2009; 120: 12–20.
5. Madrid AH, del Rey JM, Rubí J et al. Biochemical markers and cardiac troponin I release after radiofrequency catheter ablation: Approach to size of necrosis. Am Heart J, 1998; 136: 948–955.
6. Oswald H, Gardiwal A, Lissel C, Yu H, Klein G. Difference in humoral biomarkers for myocardial injury and inflammation in radiofrequency ablation versus cryoablation. Pacing Clin Elec­trophysiol, 2007; 30: 885–890.
7. Kühne M, Suter Y, Altmann D et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofre­quency catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Biomar­kers of myocardial injury, recurrence rates, and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns. Heart Rhythm, 2010; 7: 1770–1776.
8. Wojcik M, Janin S, Kuniss M et al. Limitations of biomarkers serum levels during pulmonary vein isolation. Rev Esp Cardiol, 2011; 64: 127–132.
9. Wójcik M, Janin S, Neumann T et al. Which standard biomarkers are useful for the evaluation of myocardial injury after pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon? Kardiol Pol, 2011; 69: 1151–1155.
10. Siklody CH, Arentz T, Minners J et al. Cellular damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory response after pulmonary vein isola­tion: A randomized study comparing radiofrequency ablation with cryoablation Heart Rhythm, 2012; 9: 189–196.
11. Manolis AS, Vassilikos V, Maounis T et al. Detection of myocar­dial injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation by measuring serum cardiac troponin I levels: procedural correlates. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34: 1099–1105.
12. Alaiti AM, Maroo A, Edel TB. Troponin levels after cardiac elec­trophysiology procedures: review of the literature. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2009; 32: 800–810.
13. Baust J. Cryotherapeutic intervention in cardiovascular disease (unpublished) 2002.
14. Budman H, Shitzer A, Dayan J. Analysis of the inverse problem of freezing and thawing of a binary solution during cryosurgical processes. J Biomech Eng, 1995; 117: 193–202.
15. Whittaker DK. Mechanisms of tissue destruction following cry­osurgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1984; 66: 313–318.
16. Wood MA, Parvez B, Ellenbogen AL et al. Determinants of lesion sizes and tissue temperatures during catheter cryoablation. Pa­cing Clin Electrophysiol, 2007; 30: 644–654.
17. Parvez B, Pathak V, Schubert CM, Wood M. Comparison of lesion sizes produced by cryoablation and open irrigation radiofrequency ablation catheters. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2008; 19: 528–534.
18. Buttery JE, Stuart S, Pannall PR. Stability of the CK-MB isoenzy­me on routine storage. Clin Biochem, 1992; 25: 11–13.
19. Schmidt M, Marschang H, Clifford S et al. Trends in inflammatory biomarkers during atrial fibrillation ablation across different cat­heter ablation strategies. Int J Cardiol, 2012; 158: 33–38.
20. Haegeli LM, Kotschet E, Byrne J et al. Cardiac injury after per­cutaneous catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Europace, 2008; 10: 273–275.
21. Brueckmann M, Wolpert C Bertsch T et al. Markers of myocar­dial damage, tissue healing, and inflammation after radiofrequ­ency catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, 2004; 15: 696–691.
22. Manolis AS, Vassilikos V, Maounis T et al. Detection of myocar­dial injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation by measuring serum cardiac troponin I levels: procedural correlates. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1999; 34: 1099–1105.
23. Del Rey JM, Madrid AH, Valiño JM et al. Cardiac troponin I and minor cardiac damage: Biochemical markers in a clinical model of myocardial lesions. Clin Chem, 1998; 44: 2270–2276.
24. Carlsson J, Erdogan A, Guettler N et al. Myocardial injury during radiofrequency catheter ablation: comparison of focal and linear lesions. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 2001; 24: 962–968.
25. Katritsis DG, Hossein-Nia M, Anastasakis A et al. Myocar­dial injury induced by radiofrequency and low energy ablation: A quantitative study of CK isoforms, CK-MB, and troponin-T concentrations. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 1998; 21: 1410–1416.
26. Malmborg H, Christersson C, Lönnerholm S, Blomström­-Lundqvist C. Comparison of effects on coagulation and infla­-mmatory markers using a duty-cycled bipolar and unipolar ra­diofrequency pulmonary vein ablation catheter vs. a cryoballoon catheter for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace, 2013; 15: 798–804.
27. Hirose H, Kato K, Suzuki O et al. Diagnostic accuracy of cardiac markers for myocardial damage after radiofrequency catheter ablation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol, 2006; 16: 169–174.
28. Emkanjoo Z, Mottadayen M, Givtaj N et al. Evaluation of post--radiofrequency myocardial injury by measuring cardiac troponin I levels. Int J Cardiol, 2007; 117: 173–177.