Preventing complications in colorectal anastomosis: Results of a randomized controlled trial using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 57, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1195-1201

  Placer, Carlos ^a   Enríquez Navascués, Jose M ^a   Elorza, Garazi ^a   Timoteo, Ander ^a   Mugica, Jose A ^a   Borda, Nerea ^a   Saralegui, Yolanda ^a   Elósegui, Jose L ^a  

^a HOSPITAL DONOSTIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Anastomotic complications; Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement; Colorectal anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ABSORBABLE STAPLE; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS BLEEDING; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; BIOABSORBABLE STAPLE LINE REINFORCEMENT; CANCER ADJUVANT THERAPY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLON CANCER; COLON DIVERTICULOSIS; COLON ISCHEMIA; COLON RESECTION; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE SAFETY; DIGESTIVE SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GASTROINTESTINAL STAPLER; HEMOPERITONEUM; HUMAN; ILEOSTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPY; LEARNING CURVE; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARALLEL DESIGN; PELVIS ABSCESS; PILOT STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; RECTUM CANCER; REOPERATION; SIGMOIDECTOMY; SMALL INTESTINE PERFORATION; SURGICAL APPROACH; TENSILE STRENGTH; ANASTOMOSIS; BIODEGRADABLE IMPLANT; COLON; COLON DISEASE; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; RECTUM; RECTUM DISEASE; STENOSIS, OCCLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURE; VERY ELDERLY;

ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COLON; COLONIC DISEASES; CONSTRICTION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTAL DISEASES; RECTUM; REOPERATION; SURGICAL STAPLING; SUTURES;

EID: 84908262834     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000207     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Davis B, Rivadeneira. ComplicationSof colorectal anastomoses: Leaks, strictures and bleeding. Surg Clin N Am. 2013;93: 61-87.
2. Kirchhoff P, Clavien PA, Hahnloser D. Complications in colorectal surgery: Risk factors and preventive strategies. Patient Saf Surg. 2010;4: 5.
3. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W, et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: A proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery. 2010;147: 339-351.
4. Kingham TP, Pachter HL. Colonic anastomotic leak: Risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208: 269-278.
5. Bruce J, Krukowski ZH, Al-Khairy G, Russell EM, Park KG. Systematic review of the definition and measurement of anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001;88: 1157-1168.
6. Placer C, Urdapilleta G, Markinez I, et al. Benign anastomotic strictures after oncologic rectal cancer surgery: ResultSof treatment with hydrostatic dilation [in Spanish]. Cir Esp. 2010;87: 239-243.
7. Martínez-Serrano MA, Parés D, Pera M, et al. Management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding after colorectal resection and stapled anastomosis. Tech Coloproctol. 2009;13: 49-53.
8. Cheragwandi A, Nieuwenhuis DH, Gagner M, Consten EC. An update of available innovative staple line reinforcement materials in colorectal surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2008;17: 131-137.
9. Franklin ME Jr, Berghoff KE, Arellano PP, Trevino JM, Abrego-Medina D. Safety and efficacy of the use of bioabsorbable seamguard in colorectal surgery at the Texas Endosurgery Institute. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2005;15: 9-13.
10. Franklin ME, Portillo G, Treviño JM, et al. The use of bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular stapler (BSG "Seamguard") in colorectal surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16: 411-415.
11. Portillo G, Franklin ME Jr. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple-line reinforcement for circular stapler in colorectal surgery: A multicenter study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg TecHa. 2010;20: 323-327.
12. S enagore A, Lane FR, Lee E, Wexner S, et al. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in restorative and anterior resection: A randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57: 324-330.
13. Fajardo AD, Amador-Ortiz C, Chun J, Stewart D, Fleshman JW. Evaluation of bioabsorbable seamguard for staple line reinforcement in stapled rectal anastomoses. Surg Innov. 2012;19: 288-294.
14. Jones WB, Myers KM, Traxler LB, Bour ES. Clinical results using bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for circular staplers. Am Surg. 2008; 74: 462-468.
15. N guyen NT, Longoria M, Chalifoux S, Wilson SE. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement for laparoscopic gastrointestinal surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2005;14: 107-111.
16. Ramanujam PS, Ramanujam KP, Griffin KM. Surgical outcomes after colonic and colon rectal anastomosis witHand without buttressing material Seamguard (GORE): A retrospective study of 301 cases by a single surgeon. Surg Endosc. 2011;25: S265.