Escaping the repugnant conclusion: Rank-discounted utilitarianism with variable population

Theoretical Economics

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 629-650

  Asheim, Geir B ^a   Zuber, Stéphane ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

Critical level utilitarianism; Population ethics; Social discounting; Social evaluation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908261918     PISSN: 19336837     EISSN: 15557561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3982/TE1338     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Arrhenius, Gustaf (2000), Future Generations-A Challenge for Moral Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Uppsala University.
2. Arrhenius, Gustaf (forthcoming), Population Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
3. Asheim, Geir B. (2010), "Intergenerational equity." Annual Review of Economics, 2, 197-222.
4. Asheim, Geir B. and Stéphane Zuber (2014), "Probability adjusted rank-discounted utilitarianism." Working Paper 4728, CESifo.
5. Blackorby, Charles, Walter Bossert, and David Donaldson (1995), "Intertemporal population ethics: Critical-level utilitarian principles." Econometrica, 63, 1303-1320.
6. Blackorby, Charles, Walter Bossert, and David Donaldson (1996), "Leximin population ethics."Mathematical Social Sciences, 31, 115-131.
7. Blackorby, Charles,Walter Bossert, and David Donaldson (2002), "Population principles with number-dependent critical levels." Journal of Public Economic Theory, 4, 347-368.
8. Blackorby, Charles, Walter Bossert, and David Donaldson (2005), Population Issues in Social Choice Theory, Welfare Economics, and Ethics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
9. Blackorby, Charles and David Donaldson (1984), "Social criteria for evaluating population change." Journal of Public Economics, 25, 13-33.
10. Broome, John (2004), Weighing Lives. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
11. Broome, John (2010), "The most important thing about climate change." In Public Policy: Why Ethics Matters (Jonathan Boston, Andrew Bradstock, and David Eng, eds.), 101-116, ANU E Press, Canberra.
12. Carlson, Erik (1998), "Mere addition and two trilemmas of population ethics." Economics and Philosophy, 14, 283-306.
13. Dasgupta, Partha S. (1988), "Lives and well-being." Social Choice and Welfare, 5, 103-126.
14. Dasgupta, Partha S. (2005), "Regarding optimum population." Journal of Political Philosophy, 13, 414-442.
15. Ebert, Udo (1988), "Measurement of inequality: An attempt at unification and generalization." Social Choice andWelfare, 5, 147-169.
16. Gorman, William M. (1968), "The structure of utility functions." Review of Economic Studies, 35, 367-390.
17. Ng, Yew-Kwang (1989), "What should we do about future generations? Impossibility of Parfit's theory X." Economics and Philosophy, 5, 235-253.
18. Nordhaus, William D. (2008), A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
19. Palivos, Theodore and Chong K. Yip (1993), "Optimal population size and endogenous growth." Economics Letters, 41, 107-110.
20. Parfit, Derek (1976), "On doing the best for our children." In Ethics and Population (Michael D. Bayles, ed.), 100-102, Schenkman, Cambridge,Massachusetts.
21. Parfit, Derek (1982), "Future generations, further problems." Philosophy & Public Affairs, 11, 113-172.
22. Parfit, Derek (1984), Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
23. Razin, Assaf and Chi-Wa Yuen (1995), "Utilitarian tradeoff between population growth and income growth." Journal of Population Economics, 8, 81-87.
24. Sider, Theodore (1991), "Might theory X be a theory of diminishing marginal value?" Analysis\, 51, 265-271.
25. Zuber, Stéphane and Geir B. Asheim (2012), "Justifying social discounting: The rankdiscounted utilitarian approach." Journal of Economic Theory, 147, 1572-1601.