Invasive blood pressure recording comparing nursing charts with an electronic monitor: A technical report

Critical Care and Resuscitation

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 73-75

  Glassford, Neil J ^a,b   Chai, Syn Y ^a,b   Bion, Victoria ^a   Bellomo, Rinaldo ^a  

^a AUSTIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; MEDICAL RECORD; NURSING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGIC MONITORING; PHYSIOLOGY; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEPTIC SHOCK;

BLOOD PRESSURE; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; NURSING RECORDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SHOCK, SEPTIC;

EID: 84908261225     PISSN: 14412772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Panwar R, Lanyon N, Davies AR, et al. Mean perfusion pressure deficit during the initial management of shock -- an observational cohort study. J Crit Care 2013; 28: 816-24.
2. Eastwood GM, O’Connell B, Considine J. Low-flow oxygen therapy in intensive care: an observational study. Aust Crit Care 2011; 24: 269-78.
3. Horowitz D, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Zarich S, et al. Arterial line or cuff BP? Chest 2013; 143: 270-1.
4. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Circulation 2005; 111: 697-716.
5. O’Brien E, Atkins N, Stergiou G, et al. European Society of Hypertension International Protocol revision 2010 for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15: 23-38.
6. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986; 1: 307-10.
7. Taylor R. Interpretation of the correlation coefficient: a basic review. J Diagn Med Sonog 1990; 6: 35-9. doi: 10.1177/875647939000600106.
8. Octavio JA, Contreras J, Amair P, et al. Time-weighted vs. conventional quantification of 24-h average systolic and diastolic ambulatory blood pressures. J Hypertens 2010; 28: 459-64.
9. Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Schillaci G, et al. Ambulatory blood pressure. An independent predictor of prognosis in essential hypertension. Hypertension 1994; 24: 793-801.
10. Staessen J, Thijs L, Fagard R, et al. Predicting cardiovascular risk using conventional vs ambulatory blood pressure in older patients with systolic hypertension. Systolic Hypertension in Europe Trial Investigators. JAMA 1999; 282: 539-46.
11. Kario K, Pickering TG, Matsuo T, et al. Stroke prognosis and abnormal nocturnal blood pressure falls in older hypertensives. Hypertension 2001; 38: 852-7.
12. Verdecchia P. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure: current evidence and clinical implications. Hypertension 2000; 35: 844-51.