Neonatal outcome after preimplantation genetic diagnosis

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 102, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1016-1021

  Eldar Geva, Talia ^a,b,c   Srebnik, Naama ^a,b   Altarescu, Gheona ^b,c   Varshaver, Irit ^a   Brooks, Baruch ^a   Levy Lahad, Ephrat ^b,c   Bromiker, Ruben ^b,c   Schimmel, Michael S ^b,c  

^a IVF Unit   (Israel)

^b HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^c SHAARE ZEDEK MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

Author keywords

Embryo biopsy; genetic diagnosis; intrauterine growth restriction; neonatal outcome; preimplantation; prematurity

Indexed keywords

LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; ARTICLE; BIRTH WEIGHT; BODY MASS; CONCEPTION; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FETUS DEATH; FOLLOW UP; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEWBORN; POLAR BODY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREMATURITY; PRENATAL GROWTH; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; ADULT; BIOPSY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETIC SCREENING; INFERTILITY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TWIN PREGNANCY;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BIRTH WEIGHT; FEMALE; GENETIC TESTING; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFERTILITY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PREGNANCY, TWIN; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84908236665     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: 15565653     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.06.023     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. F.M. Helmerhorst, D.A. Perquin, D. Donker, and M.J. Keirse Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies BMJ 328 2004 261
2. R.A. Jackson, K.A. Gibson, Y.W. Wu, and M.S. Croughan Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis Obstet Gynecol 103 2004 551 563
3. S.D. McDonald, K. Murphy, J. Beyene, and A. Ohlsson Perinatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies achieved by in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27 2005 449 459
4. C. Allen, S. Bowdin, R.F. Harrison, A.G. Sutcliffe, L. Brueton, and G. Kirby Pregnancy and perinatal outcomes after assisted reproduction: a comparative study Ir J Med Sci 177 2008 233 241
5. R. Grady, N. Alavi, R. Vale, M. Khandwala, and S.D. McDonald Elective single embryo transfer and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 97 2012 324 331
6. M.J. Davies, V.M. Moore, K.J. Willson, P. Van Essen, K. Priest, and H. Scott Reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects N Engl J Med 366 2012 1803 1813
7. J. Nekkebroeck, M. Bonduelle, S. Desmyttere, W. Van den Broeck, and I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen Socio-emotional and language development of 2-year-old children born after PGD/PGS, and parental well-being Hum Reprod 23 2008 1849 1857
8. A. De Vos, and A. Van Steirteghem Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis Prenat Diagn 21 2001 767 780
9. C.M. Strom, R. Levin, S. Strom, C. Masciangelo, A. Kuliev, and Y. Verlinsky Neonatal outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by polar body removal: the first 109 infants Pediatrics 106 2000 650 653
10. I. Liebaers, S. Desmyttere, W. Verpoest, M. De Rycke, C. Staessen, and K. Sermon Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis Hum Reprod 25 2010 275 282
11. V. Goossens, J. Traeger-Synodinos, E. Coonen, M. De Rycke, C. Moutou, and T. Pehlivan ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection XI: cycles from January to December 2008 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2009 Hum Reprod 27 2012 1887 1911
12. J.C. Harper, L. Wilton, J. Traeger-Synodinos, V. Goossens, C. Moutou, and S.B. Sengupta The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection Hum Reprod Update 18 2012 234 247
13. S. Desmyttere, M. De Rycke, C. Staessen, I. Liebaers, F. De Schrijver, and W. Verpoest Neonatal follow-up of 995 consecutively born children after embryo biopsy for PGD Hum Reprod 27 2012 288 293
14. I. Verlinsky, and A. Kuliev Micromanipulation and biopsy of polar bodies and blastomeres I.K.A. Verlinsky, Atlas of preimplantation genetic diagnosis 2nd ed. 2005 Taylor and Francis Oxon, UK 15 22
15. G. Altarescu, P. Renbaum, P.B. Brooks, E.J. Margalioth, A. Ben Chetrit, and G. Munter Successful polar body-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis for achondroplasia Reprod Biomed Online 16 2008 276 282
16. L.O. Lubchenco, C. Hansman, M. Dressler, and E. Boyd Intrauterine growth as estimated from liveborn birth-weight data at 24 to 42 weeks of gestation Pediatrics 32 1963 793 800
17. A. Maheshwari, S. Pandey, A. Shetty, M. Hamilton, and S. Bhattacharya Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from the transfer of frozen thawed versus fresh embryos generated through in vitro fertilization treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis Fertil Steril 98 2012 368 377.e1-9
18. U.B. Wennerholm, A.K. Henningsen, L.B. Romundstad, C. Bergh, A. Pinborg, and R. Skjaerven Perinatal outcomes of children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a Nordic cohort study from the CoNARTaS group Hum Reprod 28 2013 2545 2553
19. Y.A. Wang, E.A. Sullivan, D.L. Healy, and D.A. Black Perinatal outcomes after assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand: single versus double embryo transfer Med J Aust 190 2009 234 237
20. A. Pinborg, U.B. Wennerholm, L.B. Romundstad, A. Loft, K. Aittomaki, and V. Söderström-Anttila Why do singletons conceived after assisted reproduction technology have adverse perinatal outcome? Systematic review and meta-analysis Hum Reprod Update 19 2013 87 104
21. O. Basso, and D. Baird Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort Hum Reprod 18 2003 2478 2484
22. L. Romundstad, P. Romundstad, A. Sunde, V. von Düring, R. Skjaerven, and D. Gunnell Effects of technology or maternal factors on perinatal outcome after assisted fertilisation: a population-based cohort study Lancet 372 2008 737 743
23. K. Wisborg, H. Ingerslev, and T. Henriksen In vitro fertilization and preterm delivery, low birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit: a prospective follow-up study Fertil Steril 94 2010 2102 2106
24. A. Tsafrir, G. Altarescu, E. Margalioth, B. Brooks, P. Renbaum, and E. Levy-Lahad PGD for fragile X syndrome: ovarian function is the main determinant of success Hum Reprod 25 2010 2629 2636
25. C. Moreau, M. Kaminski, P.Y. Ancel, J. Bouyer, B. Escande, G. Thiriez EPIPAGE Group Previous induced abortions and the risk of very preterm delivery: results of the EPIPAGE study BJOG 112 2005 430 437
26. P.S. Shah, and J. Zao Knowledge Synthesis Group of Determinants of Preterm/LBW Births. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses BJOG 116 2009 1425 1442
27. A. Farhi, B. Reichman, V. Boyko, S. Mashiach, A. Hourvitz, and E.J. Margalioth Congenital malformations in infants conceived following assisted reproductive technology in comparison with spontaneously conceived infants J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 26 2013 1171 1179