Organising evidence for environmental management decisions: A '4S' hierarchy

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 29, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 607-613

  Dicks, Lynn V ^a   Walsh, Jessica C ^a   Sutherland, William J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Environmental decision making; Environmental management; Evidence; Evidence based conservation; Information; Policy; Practice

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; NATURAL RESOURCE;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; METHODS; POLICY MAKING;

CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; DECISION MAKING; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84908229670     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2014.09.004     Document Type: Review

References (68)

1. Adams W.M., Sandbrook C. Conservation, evidence and policy. Oryx 2013, 47:329-335.
2. Keene M., Pullin A.S. Realizing an effectiveness revolution in environmental management. J. Environ. Manage. 2011, 92:2130-2135.
3. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M. Effectiveness in conservation practice: pointers from medicine and public health. Conserv. Biol. 2001, 15:50-54.
4. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M. Support for decision making in conservation practice: an evidence-based approach. J. Nat. Conserv. 2003, 11:83-90.
5. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M. Doing more good than harm - building an evidence-base for conservation and environmental management. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:931-934.
6. Segan D.B., et al. Using conservation evidence to guide management. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:200-202.
7. Sutherland W.J. The Conservation Management Handbook 2000, Blackwell Science.
8. Sutherland W.J., et al. The need for evidence-based conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2004, 19:305-308.
9. Dicks L.V., et al. A transparent process for 'evidence-informed' policy making. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7:119-125.
10. Haddaway N., Pullin A.S. Evidence-based conservation and evidence-informed policy: a response to Adams & Sandbrook. Oryx 2013, 47:336-338.
11. Juntti M., et al. Evidence, politics and power in public policy for the environment. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12:207-215.
12. Bayliss H.R., et al. Does research information meet the needs of stakeholders? Exploring evidence selection in the global management of invasive species. Evid. Policy 2012, 8:37-56.
13. Bernhardt E.S., et al. Restoring rivers one reach at a time: results from a survey of US river restoration practitioners. Restor. Ecol. 2007, 15:482-493.
14. Cook C.N., et al. Managers consider multiple lines of evidence important for biodiversity management decisions. J. Environ. Manage. 2012, 113:341-346.
15. Cook C.N., et al. Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:181-186.
16. Matzek V., et al. Closing the knowing-doing gap in invasive plant management: accessibility and interdisciplinarity of scientific research. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7:208-215.
17. Pullin A.S., Knight T.M. Assessing conservation management's evidence base: a survey of management-plan compilers in the United Kingdom and Australia. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:1989-1996.
18. Sharman A., Holmes J. Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence gathering? Biofuels, the EU and the 10% target. Environ. Policy Gov. 2010, 20:309-321.
19. Young K.D., Van Aarde R.J. Science and elephant management decisions in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2011, 144:876-885.
20. Bainbridge I. How can ecologists make conservation policy more evidence based? Ideas and examples from a devolved perspective. J. Appl. Ecol. 2014, 10.1111/1365-2664.12294.
21. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust 2011, National Academic Press. R. Graham (Ed.).
22. Haynes R.B. Of studies, summaries, synopses, and systems: the "4S" evolution of services for finding current best evidence. Evid. Based Med. 2001, 6:36-38.
23. DiCenso A., et al. Accessing pre-appraised evidence: fine-tuning the 5S model into a 6S model. Evid. Based Nurs. 2009, 12:99-101.
24. Haynes R.B. Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions. Evid. Based Med. 2006, 11:162-164.
25. Windish D. Searching for the right evidence: how to answer your clinical questions using the 6S hierarchy. Evid. Based Med. 2013, 18:93-97.
26. Williams D.R., et al. Bird Conservation: Evidence for the Effects of Interventions 2013, Pelagic Publishing.
27. McNie E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:17-38.
28. Balme G.A., et al. Failure of research to address the rangewide conservation needs of large carnivores: leopards in South Africa as a case study. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 7:3-11.
29. Guidelines for Systematic Review and Evidence Synthesis in Environmental Management 2013, Collaboration for Environmental Evidence, Version 4.2. Environmental Evidence. http://www.environmentalevidence.org/Documents/Guidelines/Guidelines4.2.pdf.
30. Pullin A.S., Stewart G.B. Guidelines for systematic review in conservation and environmental management. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20:1647-1656.
31. Roberts P.D., et al. Are review articles a reliable source of evidence to support conservation and environmental management? A comparison with medicine. Biol. Conserv. 2006, 132:409-423.
32. Mascia M.B., et al. Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 169:258-267.
33. Cook C.N., et al. Contribution of systematic reviews to management decisions. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:902-915.
34. Fazey I., et al. Can methods applied in medicine be used to summarize and disseminate conservation research?. Environ. Conserv. 2004, 31:190-198.
35. Munroe R., et al. Review of the evidence base for ecosystem-based approaches for adaptation to climate change. Environ. Evid. 2012, 1:1-11.
36. Randall N., et al. How effective are slurry storage, cover or catch crops, woodland creation, controlled trafficking or break-up of compacted layers, and buffer strips as on-farm mitigation measures for delivering an improved water environment?. Environ. Evid. 2012, 1:12.
37. Randall N., James K. The effectiveness of integrated farm management, organic farming and agri-environment schemes for conserving biodiversity in temperate Europe - a systematic map. Environ. Evid. 2012, 1:1-21.
38. Stewart R., et al. The size and nature of the evidence-base for smallholder farming in Africa: a systematic map. J. Dev. Effect. 2014, 6:58-68.
39. Dicks L.V., et al. Farmland Conservation: Evidence for the Effects of Interventions in Northern Europe 2014, Pelagic Publishing.
40. Smith R.K., Sutherland W.J. Amphibian Conservation: Global Evidence for the Effects of Interventions 2014, Pelagic Publishing.
41. Sutherland W.J., et al. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2011, 2:238-247.
42. Sutherland W.J., et al. Quantifying the impact and relevance of scientific research. PLoS ONE 2011, 6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0027537.
43. Defra A Consultation on the National Pollinator Strategy: for Bees and other Pollinators in England 2014, Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs.
44. Moja L., Banzi R. Navigators for medicine: evolution of online point-of-care evidence-based services. Int. J. Clin. Pract. 2011, 65:6-11.
45. Banzi R., et al. A review of online evidence-based practice point-of-care information summary providers. J. Med. Internet Res. 2010, 12:e39.
46. Laniak G.F., et al. Integrated environmental modeling: a vision and roadmap for the future. Environ. Model. Software 2013, 39:3-23.
47. Parker P., et al. Progress in integrated assessment and modelling. Environ. Model. Software 2002, 17:209-217.
48. Oxley T., et al. Integrated modelling and decision-support tools: a Mediterranean example. Environ. Model. Software 2004, 19:999-1010.
49. Packalen T., et al. Review. A brief overview of forest management decision support systems (FMDSS) listed in the FORSYS wiki. For. Syst. 2013, 22:263-269.
50. McIntosh B.S., et al. On the design of computer-based models for integrated environmental science. Environ. Manage. 2005, 35:741-752.
51. Jakku E., Thorburn P.J. A conceptual framework for guiding the participatory development of agricultural decision support systems. Agric. Syst. 2010, 103:675-682.
52. Stewart A., et al. Improving the science-policy-practice interface: decision support system uptake and use in the forestry sector in Great Britain. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2013, 10.1080/02827581.2013.849358.
53. Valls-Donderis P., et al. Participatory development of decision support systems: which features of the process lead to improved uptake and better outcomes?. Scand. J. Forest Res. 2013, 10.1080/02827581.2013.837950.
54. Volk M., et al. How can we make progress with decision support systems in landscape and river basin management? Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of four different decision support systems. Environ. Manage. 2010, 46:834-849.
55. Stewart A., et al. The Uptake of Decision Support Systems in the GB Forestry Sector 2013, Forest Research, Forestry Commission. http://www.forestry.gov.uk/fr/INFD-8BXCT3.
56. Diez E., McIntosh B.S. Organisational drivers for, constraints on and impacts of decision and information support tool use in desertification policy and management. Environ. Model. Software 2011, 26:317-327.
57. Whittaker C., et al. A comparison of carbon accounting tools for arable crops in the United Kingdom. Environ. Model. Software 2013, 46:228-239.
58. Burszta-Adamiak E., Mrowiec M. Modelling of green roofs' hydrologic performance using EPA's SWMM. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68:36-42.
59. Li Y., Babcock R.W. Green roof hydrologic performance and modeling: a review. Water Sci. Technol. 2014, 69:727-738.
60. Rowe D.B. Green roofs as a means of pollution abatement. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159:2100-2110.
61. Bailey M.A., et al. Habitat Management Guidelines for Amphibians and Reptiles of the Southeastern United States 2006, Technical Publication HMG-2, Partners in Amphibian and Reptile Conservation (PARC).
62. Burgman M.A., et al. Expert status and performance. Plos ONE 2011, 6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0022998.
63. Green M., et al. How to grow nectar flower mixtures. Natural England Technical Information Note TIN094 2011, Natural England.
64. Santangeli A., et al. Ineffective enforced legislation for nature conservation: a case study with Siberian flying squirrel and forestry in a boreal landscape. Biol. Conserv. 2013, 157:237-244.
65. Seavy N.E., Howell C.A. How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions?. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:1261-1267.
66. Cook C.N., et al. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conserv. Biol. 2013, 27:669-678.
67. Sutherland W.J. Review by quality not quantity for better policy. Nature 2013, 503:167.
68. Walsh T., et al. Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review. BMJ 2014, 348. 10.1136/bmj.g188.