Empirical analysis of heterogeneous traffic flow and calibration of porous flow model

Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

Volumn 48, Issue , 2014, Pages 418-436

  Ambarwati, Lasmini ^a,b   Pel, Adam J ^a   Verhaeghe, Robert ^a   van Arem, Bart ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^b BRAWIJAYA UNIVERSITY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Critical pore size; Heterogeneous traffic flow; Non lane based traffic; Pore size density distributions; Porous flow model

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; MOTORCYCLES; PORE SIZE; URBAN TRANSPORTATION;

DENSITY DISTRIBUTIONS; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; HETEROGENEOUS TRAFFIC FLOW; PASSENGER CAR UNIT; POROUS FLOW; SUPPORT POLICY; URBAN TRANSPORT; VEHICLE INTERACTIONS;

TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

DEVELOPING WORLD; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; FLOW MODELING; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIUM; POROSITY; POROUS MEDIUM; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT; URBAN AREA; URBAN TRANSPORT;

EAST JAVA; INDONESIA; SURABAYA;

EID: 84908227946     PISSN: 0968090X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trc.2014.09.017     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Arasan V., Koshy R. Methodology for modeling highly heterogeneous traffic flow. J. Transp. Eng. 2005, 131:544-551.
2. Chang G., Kao Y. An empirical investigation of macroscopic lane-changing characteristics on uncongested multilane freeways. Transp. Res. Part A: General 1991, 25:375-389.
3. Department of Planning and Development of Surabaya, 2007. Master Plan of Surabaya City, Technical Report. Surabaya, Indonesia.
4. Dubey S.K., Ponnu B., Arkatkar S.S. Time gap modeling under mixed traffic condition: a statistical analysis. J. Transp. Syst. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2012, 12:72-84.
5. Farah H., Toledo T. Passing behavior on two-lane highways. Transp. Res. Part F 2010, 13:355-364.
6. Gowri A., Sivanandan R. Evaluation of left turn channelization at a signalized intersection under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Transport 2008, 23:221-229. 10.3846/1648-4142.2008.23.221-229.
7. Herman R., Prigogine I. A two-fluid approach to town traffic. Science 1979, 204:148-151.
8. Hossain D., Iqbal G. Vehicular headway distribution and free speed characteristics on two-lane two-way highways of Bangladesh. J. Inst. Eng. India Civil Eng. Div. 1999, 80:77-80.
9. Hu X., Wang W., Yang H. Mixed traffic flow model considering illegal lane-changing behavior: simulations in the framework of Kerner's three-phase theory. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 2012, 391:5102-5111.
10. Idris, M., 2010. The Criteria for Motorcycle Lane for Secondary Arterial Road (in Indonesian), Technical Report. Puslitbang Jalan dan Jembatan, Bandung.
11. Jia B., Li X.G., Chen T., Jiang R., Gao Z.Y. Cellular automaton model with time gap dependent randomisation under Kerner's three-phase traffic theory. Transportmetrica 2011, 7:127-140.
12. Khan S.I., Maini P. Modeling heterogeneous traffic flow. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1999, 1678:234-241.
13. Knoppers, P., van Lint, J.W.C., Hoogendoorn, S.P., 2012. Automatic stabilization of arterial traffic images. In: 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
14. Krishnamurthy K., Arasan V. Effect of traffic volume on PCU of vehicles under heterogeneous traffic conditions. Road Transp. Res.: J. Aust. N. Z. Res. Pract. 2008, 17:32-49.
15. Krishnamurthy K., Thamizh Arasan V. Effect of road width and traffic volume on vehicular interactions in heterogeneous traffic. J. Adv. Transp. 2012, 48:1-14.
16. Mallikarjuna, Rao, K.R., 2006. Modelling of passenger car equivalency under heterogeneous traffic conditions. In: 22nd ARRB Conference - Research into Practice, Canberra Australia.
17. Marwah B., Singh B. Level of service classification for urban heterogeneous traffic: a case study of Kanpur metropolis. Proceedings 4th International Symposium on Highway Capacity: Transportation Research Circular E-C018 2000, 271-286. Transportation Research Board, Maui, Hawaii.
18. Nair R., Mahmassani H.S., Miller-Hooks E. A porous flow approach to modeling heterogeneous traffic in disordered systems. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 2011, 45:1331-1345.
19. Nair, R., Mahmassani, H.S., Miller-Hooks, E., 2012. A porous flow model for disordered heterogeneous traffic streams. In: 91st Annual Meeting of Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C.
20. Police Department of Surabaya City, 2011. Accident Report of Surabaya City in 2010, Technical Report, Surabaya, Indonesia.
21. Rossi R., Meneguzzer C., Gastaldi M. Transfer and updating of logit models of gap-acceptance and their operational implications. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 2013, 28:142-154.
22. RSNI, 2004. Standardization for Urban Highway Geometry in Indonesia (in Indonesian), Dept. of National Standardization, Technical Report, Indonesia.
23. Sharma N., Arkatkar S.S., Sarkar A.K. Study on heterogeneous traffic flow characteristics of a two-lane road. Transport 2011, 26:185-196.
24. Venkatesan K., Gowri A., Sivanandan R. Development of microscopic simulation model for heterogeneous traffic using object oriented approach. Transportmetrica 2008, 4:227-247.