New thermophysical properties of water based TiO2 nanofluid-The hysteresis phenomenon revisited

International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer

Volumn 58, Issue , 2014, Pages 85-95

  Said, Z ^a,b   Saidur, R ^a   Hepbasli, A ^c   Rahim, N A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b KHALIFA UNIVERSITY   (United Arab Emirates)

^c YASAR UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Density; Hysteresis; Nanofluid; Pumping power; Thermal conductivity; Viscosity

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COOLING SYSTEMS; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY); DROPS; DYNAMIC LIGHT SCATTERING; HEAT TRANSFER; HYSTERESIS; NANOPARTICLES; PRESSURE DROP; PUMPS; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SUSPENSIONS (FLUIDS); TEMPERATURE; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY OF LIQUIDS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; TRANSMISSION ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VISCOSITY; VISCOSITY MEASUREMENT; VOLUME FRACTION; ZETA POTENTIAL; ALUMINUM; LIGHT SCATTERING; THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTIES;

FLAT-PLATE SOLAR COLLECTORS; HEAT TRANSFER ENHANCEMENT; NANO-CRYSTALLINE STRUCTURES; NANOFLUIDS; PUMPING POWER; THERMAL CONDUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENT; THERMO-PHYSICAL PROPERTY; ZETA POTENTIAL MEASUREMENTS; HYSTERESIS PHENOMENON; TIO; WATER BASED;

NANOFLUIDICS; DENSITY (SPECIFIC GRAVITY);

EID: 84908146885     PISSN: 07351933     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2014.08.034     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Eastman J., Choi S., Li S., Yu W., Thompson L. Anomalously increased effective thermal conductivities of ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing copper nanoparticles. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78(6):718-720.
2. Pak B.C., Cho Y.I. Hydrodynamic and heat transfer study of dispersed fluids with submicron metallic oxide particles. Exp. Heat Transf. Int. J. 1998, 11(2):151-170.
3. Said Z., Sajid M., Saidur R., Kamalisarvestani M., Rahim N. Radiative properties of nanofluids. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 46:74-84.
4. Natarajan E., Sathish R. Role of nanofluids in solar water heater. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2009, 1-5.
5. 3-nanofluid and its effect on a flat plate solar collector. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2013, 48:99-107.
6. Otanicar T.P., Golden J.S. Comparative environmental and economic analysis of conventional and nanofluid solar hot water technologies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(15):6082-6087.
7. Otanicar T.P., Phelan P.E., Prasher R.S., Rosengarten G., Taylor R.A. Nanofluid-based direct absorption solar collector. J. Renew. Sust. Energ. 2010, 2:033102.
8. 2O nanofluid on the efficiency of a flat-plate solar collector. Sol. Energy 2011, 86(2):771-779.
9. 2O nanofluid on the efficiency of flat-plate solar collectors. Renew. Energy 2012, 39(1):293-298.
10. Taylor R.A., Phelan P.E., Otanicar T.P., Adrian R., Prasher R. Nanofluid optical property characterization: towards efficient direct absorption solar collectors. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6(1):1-11.
11. Tiwari A.K., Ghosh P., Sarkar J. Solar water heating using nanofluids-a comprehensive overview and environmental impact analysis. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Adv. Eng. 2013, 3(3):221-224.
12. Saidur R., Meng T., Said Z., Hasanuzzaman M., Kamyar A. Evaluation of the effect of nanofluid-based absorbers on direct solar collector. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2012, 55(21-22):5899-5907.
13. 3-based nanofluids: a review. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6(1):1-16.
14. 2 nanofluids. Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci. 2011, 36:65-71.
15. 2 nanofluids. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. Lett. 2012, 4(1):105-109.
16. 2 nanoparticles. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 109:024305.
17. Xie H., Yu W., Chen W. MgO nanofluids: higher thermal conductivity and lower viscosity among ethylene glycol-based nanofluids containing oxide nanoparticles. J. Exp. Nanosci. 2010, 5(5):463-472.
18. 2 nanofluids. Int. J. Thermophys. 2009, 30(4):1213-1226.
19. Wang X.Q., Mujumdar A.S. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2007, 46(1):1-19.
20. Eastman J., Choi U., Li S., Thompson L., Lee S. Enhanced thermal conductivity through the development of nanofluids. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings 1997, Cambridge Univ Press.
21. Wang X., Xu X.S., Choi S.U. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture. J. Thermophys. Heat Transf. 1999, 13(4):474-480.
22. Masuda H., Ebata A., Teramae K., Hishinuma N. Alteration of thermal conductivity and viscosity of liquid by dispersing ultra-fine particles. Netsu Bussei 1993, 7(2):227-233.
23. Lee S., Choi S.U., Li S., Eastman J. Measuring thermal conductivity of fluids containing oxide nanoparticles. J. Heat Transf. 1999, 121(2).
24. Aladag B., Halelfadl S., Doner N., Maré T., Duret S., Estellé P. Experimental investigations of the viscosity of nanofluids at low temperatures. Appl. Energy 2012, 97:876-880.
25. Nguyen C., Desgranges F., Roy G., Galanis N., Mare T., Boucher S., Angue Mintsa H. Temperature and particle-size dependent viscosity data for water-based nanofluids-hysteresis phenomenon. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2007, 28(6):1492-1506.
26. Nguyen C.T., Galanis N., Maré T., Eveillard E. New viscosity data for CuO-water nanofluid-the hysteresis phenomenon revisited. Adv. Sci. Technol. 2013, 81:101-106.
27. Huminic G., Huminic A. Application of nanofluids in heat exchangers: a review. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2012, 16(8):5625-5638.
28. Fan X., Chen H., Ding Y., Plucinski P.K., Lapkin A.A. Potential of 'nanofluids' to further intensify microreactors. Green Chem. 2008, 10(6):670-677.
29. 2 nanofluids in a double-tube counter flow heat exchanger. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transf. 2011, 38(2):218-228.
30. 3/water nanofluid inside a circular tube. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 2010, 31(4):606-612.
31. 2-water nanofluids. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2011, 6(1):1-7.
32. 2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2007, 50(11):2272-2281.
33. 2 nanoparticle suspensions. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 2003, 355(1):186-192.
34. Einstein A. Calculation of the viscosity-coefficient of a liquid in which a large number of small spheres are suspended in irregular distribution. Ann. Phys. Leipzig 1906, 19:286-306.
35. Brinkman H. The viscosity of concentrated suspensions and solutions. J. Chem. Phys. 1952, 5(20):71.
36. Batchelor G. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. J. Fluid Mech. 1977, 83(01):97-117.
37. Abu-Nada E., Masoud Z., Oztop H.F., Campo A. Effect of nanofluid variable properties on natural convection in enclosures. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2010, 49(3):479-491.
38. Masoud Hosseini S., Moghadassi A., Henneke D.E. A new dimensionless group model for determining the viscosity of nanofluids. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2010, 100(3):873-877.
39. Maiga S.E.B., Nguyen C.T., Galanis N., Roy G. Heat transfer behaviours of nanofluids in a uniformly heated tube. Superlattice. Microst. 2004, 35(3):543-557.
40. Garg H., Agarwal R. Some aspects of a PV/T collector/forced circulation flat plate solar water heater with solar cells. Energy Convers. Manag. 1995, 36(2):87-99.
41. White F.M. Fluid Mechanics. 5th 2003, McGraw-Hill Book Company, Boston.
42. Das S.K., Choi S.U., Patel H.E. Heat transfer in nanofluids-a review. Heat Transf. Eng. 2006, 27(10):3-19.
43. Jang S.P., Choi S.U. Role of Brownian motion in the enhanced thermal conductivity of nanofluids. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2004, 84(21):4316-4318.
44. Wang X.Q., Mujumdar A.S. A review on nanofluids-part I: theoretical and numerical investigations. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 25(4):613-630.
45. Fedele L., Colla L., Bobbo S. Viscosity and thermal conductivity measurements of water-based nanofluids containing titanium oxide nanoparticles. Int. J. Refrig. 2012, 35(5):1359-1366.
46. Xie H., Wang J., Xi T., Liu Y., Ai F. Dependence of the thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture on the base fluid. J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 2002, 21(19):1469-1471.
47. Kabelac S., Kuhnke J. Heat transfer mechanisms in nanofluids-Experiments and theory. Annals of the assembly for international heat transfer conference 2006.
48. Ding Y., Alias H., Wen D., Williams R.A. Heat transfer of aqueous suspensions of carbon nanotubes (CNT nanofluids). Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2006, 49(1):240-250.
49. Kwak K., Kim C. Viscosity and thermal conductivity of copper oxide nanofluid dispersed in ethylene glycol. Korea Aust. Rheol. J. 2005, 17(2):35-40.
50. Prasher R., Song D., Wang J., Phelan P. Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2006, 89(13):133108.
51. Chen H., Ding Y., Tan C. Rheological behaviour of nanofluids. New J. Phys. 2007, 9(10):367.
52. Chen H., Ding Y. Heat transfer and rheological behaviour of nanofluids-a review. Advances in Transport Phenomena 2009, 135-177. Springer.
53. Gherasim I., Roy G., Nguyen C.T., Vo-Ngoc D. Heat transfer enhancement and pumping power in confined radial flows using nanoparticle suspensions (nanofluids). Int. J. Therm. Sci. 2011, 50(3):369-377.
54. 4. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2013, Vol. 16. No. 1. IOP Publishing.