Risk assessment in support of plant health

EFSA Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2012, Pages

  Jeger, Michael ^a   Schans, Jan ^a   Lövei, Gabor L ^a   van Lenteren, Joop ^a   Navajas, Maria ^a   Makowski, David ^a   Stancanelli, Giuseppe ^a   Tramontini, Sara ^a   B Ceglarska, Elzbieta ^a  

^a EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Italy)

Author keywords

ecosystem services; EU Plant Health Regime; harmonised risk assessment framework; pathway analysis; plant health; risk reducing options

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908146018     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.s1012     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Caffier DJ, Choiseul E, Dormannsné Simon E, Jones D, Makowski C, Manceau L, Manici L, Oude Lansink A, Porta Puglia A, Smith J, Stancanelli G, Steffek R, Stefani E, Strömberg A and Vloutoglou I, 2008. Evaluation of risk assessments on fungal and bacterial pathogens of banana for the French overseas departments. Journal of Plant Pathology, 90 (2, Supplement), S2.41.
2. Donatelli M, Bregaglio S, Fumagalli D and Baruth B, 2012. Model framework for the assessment of EU climatic suitability for the establishment of organisms harmful to plants and plant products –CLIMPEST project (SLA/EFSA-JRC/2008/PLH/01). Supporting Publications 2012:EN-247. [63 pp.]. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/doc/247e.pdf
3. EPPO (European Plant Protection Organisation), 2011. Guidelines on Pest Risk Analysis PM 5/3 (5) 11–17053. Decision-support scheme for quarantine pests. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, pp. 44. Available from: archives.eppo.int/EPPOStandards/pra.htm
4. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008a. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Heath on a request from the European Commission on Guignardia citricarpa Kiely. The EFSA Journal (2008) 925, 1–108.
5. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008b. EFSA's 10th Scientific Colloquium - Pest risk assessment - Science in support of phytosanitary decision making in the European Community. EFSA, December 2007, Parma, Italy. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/120e.htm
6. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2011. EFSA's 16th Scientific Colloquium on emerging risks in plant health: from plant pest interactions to global change. EFSA, June 2011, Parma, Italy. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/199e.htm
7. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2009. Guidance of the Panel on Plant Health following a request from EFSA on the evaluation of pest risk assessments and risk management options prepared to justify requests for phytosanitary measures under Council Directive 2000/29/EC, EFSA Journal (2009) 1194, 1–18.
8. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2010a. Guidance on a harmonised framework for pest risk assessment and the identification and evaluation of pest risk management options by EFSA. EFSA Journal 2010;8(2):1495. [66 pp.].
9. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2010b. Scientific opinion on a quantitative pathway analysis of the likelihood of Tilletia indica M. introduction into EU with importation of US wheat. EFSA Journal 2010;8(6):1621. [88 pp.].
10. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2011a. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of plant pests. EFSA Journal 2011;9(12):2460. [121 pp.].
11. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2011b. Scientific Opinion on a technical file submitted by the US Authorities to support a request to list a new option among the EU import requirements for wood of Agrilus planipennis host plants. EFSA Journal 2011;9(7):2185. [51 pp.].
12. EFSA Panel on Plant Health (PLH), 2012. Scientific Opinion on Guidance of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health on methodology for evaluation of the effectiveness of options to reduce the risk of introduction and spread of organisms harmful to plant health in the EU territory. EFSA Journal 2012;10(6):2755. [92 pp.].
13. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2011a. IPPC (International Plant Protection Convention) 1997, 18pp.
14. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations), 2011b. ISPM (International Standards for Phytosanitary Measures) No 11, Pest risk analysis for quarantine pests including analysis of environmental risks and living modified organisms – 2004, 30pp.
15. MacLeod A, Anderson H, Gaag DJVD, Holt J, Karadjova O, Kehlenbeck H, Labonne G, Pruvost O, Reynaud P, Schrader G, Smith J, Steffek R, Viaene N and Vloutoglou I, 2010. Prima phacie: a new European Food Safety Authority funded research project taking a comparative approach to pest risk assessment and methods to evaluate pest risk management. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin 40, 435–439.
16. Rossi V, Giosuè S and Bernazzani R, 2009a. Pest risk assessment in the European Community: inventory of data sources. External scientific report. Published 15 December 2009. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/29e.htm
17. Rossi V, Salinari F, Bernazzani R, Giosuè S and Mazzoni E, 2009b. Models for pest's epidemiology: review, documentation and evaluation for Pest Risk Analysis (Mopest). External scientific report. Published 16 December 2009. Available from: www.efsa.europa.eu/en/supporting/pub/28e.htm
18. Schans J, Ceglarska EB, Cheek S and Stancanelli G, 2008. The EFSA Panel on plant health: accomplishments and challenges for the EU pest risk assessment. Journal of Plant Pathology (2008), 90 (2, Supplement), S2.40.
19. Steffek R, Follak S, Strauss G, Verhoeven K, Potting R, Karadjova O, Ventislavov V, Krumor V and MacLeod A, 2011. On the distribution of Ca. Phytoplasma pyri in the European Union based on a systematic literature review approach. Bulletin of Insectology 64 (Supplement): S271–S272, 2011.
20. Steffek R, Follak S, Sauvion N, Labonne G and MacLeod A, 2012. Distribution of ‘Candidatus Phytoplasma prunorum’ and its vector Cacopsylla pruni in European fruit growing areas: a review. OEPP/EPPO Bulletin (in press).
21. USDA APHIS (United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), 2008. Quantitative pathway analysis: likelihood of karnal bunt, (Tilletia indica M.), introduction as a result of the importation of United States wheat for Grain into the European Union and Desert durum wheat for grain into Italy. United States Department of Agriculture-Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, 105 pp.