Native plant diversity increases herbivory to non-natives

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 281, Issue 1794, 2014, Pages

  Pearse, Ian S ^a   Hipp, Andrew L ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS   (United States)

^b MORTON ARBORETUM   (United States)

^c FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Biotic resistance hypothesis; Enemy release hypothesis; Host breadth; Invasions; Phylogenetic relatedness

Indexed keywords

DECIDUOUS TREE; ENEMY RELEASE HYPOTHESIS; EXPLOITATION; HERBIVORY; INSECT; INTRODUCED SPECIES; INVASIBILITY; NATIVE SPECIES; PHYLOGENETICS; RELATEDNESS; SPECIES RICHNESS;

EID: 84908141198     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712954     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.1841     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Levine JM, Adler PB, Yelenik SG. 2004 A metaanalysis of biotic resistance to exotic plant invasions. Ecol. Lett. 7, 975-989. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248. 2004.00657.x)
2. Maron JL, Vilá M. 2001 When do herbivores affect plant invasion? Evidence for the natural enemies and biotic resistance hypotheses. Oikos 95, 361-373. (doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2001. 950301.x)
3. Pearse IS, Harris DJ, Karban R, Sih A. 2013 Predicting novel herbivore-plant interactions. Oikos 122, 1554-1564. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013. 00527.x)
4. Keane RM, Crawley MJ. 2002 Exotic plant invasions and the enemy release hypothesis. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17, 164-170. (doi:10.1016/S0169- 5347(02)02499-0)
5. Pearse IS, Altermatt F. 2013 Predicting novel trophic interactions in a non-native world. Ecol. Lett. 16, 1088-1094. (doi:10.1111/ele.12143)
6. Verhoeven KJF, Biere A, Harvey JA, van der Putten WH. 2009 Plant invaders and their novel natural enemies: who is naive? Ecol. Lett. 12, 107-117. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01248.x)
7. Agrawal AA, Kotanen PM, Mitchell CE, Power AG, Godsoe W, Klironomos J. 2005 Enemy release? An experiment with congeneric plant pairs and diverse above- and belowground enemies. Ecology 86, 2979-2989. (doi:10.1890/05-0219)
8. Cappuccino N, Carpenter D. 2005 Invasive exotic plants suffer less herbivory than non-invasive exotic plants. Biol. Lett. 1, 435-438. (doi:10.1098/rsbl. 2005.0341)
9. Pearse IS, Hipp AL. 2009 Phylogenetic and trait similarity to a native species predict herbivory on non-native oaks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 18 097-18 102. (doi:10.1073/pnas. 0904867106)
10. Connor EF, Faeth SH, Simberloff D, Opler PA. 1980 Taxonomic isolation and the accumulation of herbivorous insects: a comparison of introduced and native trees. Ecol. Entomol. 5, 205-211. (doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1980. tb01143.x)
11. Ness JH, Rollinson EJ, Whitney KD. 2011 Phylogenetic distance can predict susceptibility to attack by natural enemies. Oikos 120, 1327-1334. (doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19119.x)
12. Hill SB, Kotanen PM. 2009 Evidence that phylogenetically novel non-indigenous plants experience less herbivory. Oecologia 161, 581-590. (doi:10.1007/s00442-009-1403-0)
13. Hill SB, Kotanen PM. 2010 Phylogenetically structured damage to Asteraceae: susceptibility of native and exotic species to foliar herbivores. Biol. Invasions 12, 3333-3342. (doi:10.1007/s10530- 010-9726-7)
14. Ortega YK, Pearson DE. 2005 Weak vs. strong invaders of natural plant communities: assessing invasibility and impact. Ecol. Appl. 15, 651-661. (doi:10.1890/04-0119)
15. Wilsey BJ, Polley HW. 2002 Reductions in grassland species evenness increase dicot seedling invasion and spittle bug infestation. Ecol. Lett. 5, 676-684. (doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2002. 00372.x)
16. Price JN, Partel M. 2013 Can limiting similarity increase invasion resistance? A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Oikos 122, 649-656. (doi:10. 1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00121.x)
17. Tilman D. 1999 The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology 80, 1455-1474. (doi:10. 1890/0012-9658(1999)0801455:tecoci]2.0.co;2)
18. Klironomos JN. 2002 Feedback with soil biota contributes to plant rarity and invasiveness in communities. Nature 417, 67-70. (doi:10.1038/ 417067a)
19. Dinnage R, Cadotte MW, Haddad NM, Crutsinger GM, Tilman D. 2012 Diversity of plant evolutionary lineages promotes arthropod diversity. Ecol. Lett. 15, 1308-1317. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2012.01854.x)
20. Thornthwaite CW. 1948 An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geogr. Rev. 38, 55-94. (doi:10.2307/210739)
21. Miller H, Lamb S. 1985 Oaks of North America. Happy Camp, CA: Naturegraph Publishers.
22. USDA NRCS. 2013 The PLANTS database. Greensboro, NC: National Plant Data Team. See http://plants. usda.gov. (Accessed on 17 July 2013).
23. Pearse IS, Hipp AL. 2012 Global patterns of leaf defenses in oak species are predicted by seasonality, precipitation, and temperature. Evolution 66, 2272-2286. (doi:10. 1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01591.x)
24. Hipp AL, Eaton DAR, Cavendar-Bares J, Fitzek E, Nipper R, Manos PS. 2014 A framework phylogeny of the American oak clade based on sequenced RAD data. PLoS ONE 9, e9375. (doi:10.1371/journal.pone. 0093975)
25. R Core Development Team. 2012 R v. 2.15.1. The R Foundation. See http://cran.us.r-project.org/.
26. Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D, The R Core Development Team. 2009 nlme: linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. R package v. 3.1-93. See http://cran.r-project.org/web/ packages/nlme/index.html.
27. Paradis E, Claude J, Strimmer K. 2004 APE: analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R language. Bioinformatics 20, 289-290. (doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btg412)
28. Kembel SW, Cowan PD, Helmus MR, Cornwell WK, Morlon H, Ackerly DD, Blomberg SP, Webb CO. 2010 Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics 26, 1463-1464. (doi:10. 1093/bioinformatics/btq166)
29. Cavender-Bares J, Ackerly DD, Baum DA, Bazzaz FA. 2004 Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. Am. Nat. 163, 823-843. (doi:10. 1086/386375)
30. Crawley MJ. 1985 Reduction of oak fecundity by low density herbivore populations. Nature 314, 163-164. (doi:10.1038/314163a0)
31. Marquis RJ, Whelan CJ. 1994 Insectivorous birds increase growth of white oak through consumption of leaf-chewing insects. Ecology 75, 2007-2014. (doi:10.2307/ 1941605)
32. Hochwender CG, Sork VL, Marquis RJ. 2003 Fitness consequences of herbivory on Quercus alba. Am. Midl. Nat. 150, 246-253. (doi:10.1674/0003- 0031(2003)1500246:fcohoq]2.0.co;2)
33. Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. 2007 Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol. Lett. 10, 835-848. (doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x)
34. Jactel H, Birgersson G, Andersson S, Schlyter F. 2011 Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth. Oecologia 166, 703-711. (doi:10.1007/s00442-011-1918-z)
35. Graves SD, Shapiro AM. 2003 Exotics as host plants of the California butterfly fauna. Biol. Conserv. 110, 413-433. (doi:10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00233-1)