Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis and digital mammography

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 312, Issue 16, 2014, Pages 1695-

  Seidenwurm, David ^a   Rosenberg, Robert ^b  

^a Sutter Medical Center   (United States)

^b Radiology Associates of Albuquerque   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER SCREENING; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INVASIVE PROCEDURE; LETTER; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIOLOGIST; TOMOGRAPHY; TOMOSYNTHESIS; BREAST TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; IMAGE QUALITY; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; RADIOGRAPHY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84908139956     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.11117     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014;311(24):2499-2507.
2. Rosenberg RD, Yankaskas BC, Abraham LA, et al. Performance benchmarks for screening mammography. Radiology. 2006;241(1):55-66.
3. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
4. Sickles E, Dorsi C. ACR BI-RADS: Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
5. Schell MJ, Yankaskas BC, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Evidence-based target recall rates for screening mammography. Radiology. 2007;243(3):681-689.