Assessment of interbasin groundwater flows between catchments using a semi-distributed water balance model

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 519, Issue PB, 2014, Pages 1848-1858

  Pellicer Martínez, Francisco ^a   Martínez Paz, José Miguel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MURCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Groundwater exchange; Hydrogeology; Interbasin flow; Lumped water balance model; Semi distributed model

Indexed keywords

GROUNDWATER EXCHANGES; INTERBASIN FLOW; INTERBASIN GROUNDWATER FLOWS; SEMI-DISTRIBUTED; SEMI-DISTRIBUTED MODEL; WATER BALANCE MODELS;

HYDROGEOLOGY;

AQUIFER; CATCHMENT; GROUNDWATER FLOW; HEADWATER; HYDROGEOLOGY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; WATER BUDGET;

SEGURA BASIN; SPAIN;

EID: 84908099150     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.09.067     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alley W.M. On the treatment of evapotranspiration, soil-moisture accounting, and aquifer recharge in monthly water-balance models. Water Resour. Res. 1984, 20(8):1137-1149.
2. Altchenko Y., Villholth K.G. Transboundary aquifer mapping and management in Africa: a harmonised approach. Hydrogeol. J. 2013, 21(7):1497-1517.
3. Arnold J.G., Allen P.M. Automated methods for estimating baseflow and ground water recharge from streamflow records. J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1999, 35(2):411-424.
4. Baudron P., Alonso-Sarría F., García-Aróstegui J.L., Cánovas-García F., Martínez-Vicente D., Moreno-Brotóns J. Identifying the origin of groundwater samples in a multi-layer aquifer system with Random Forest classification. J. Hydrol. 2013, 499:303-315.
5. Belmar O., Velasco J., Martinez-Capel F. Hydrological classification of natural flow regimes to support environmental flow assessments in intensively regulated mediterranean rivers, Segura River Basin (Spain). Environ. Manage. 2011, 47(5):992-1004.
6. Carroll R.W.H., Pohll G.M., Earman S., Hershey R.L. A comparison of groundwater fluxes computed with MODFLOW and a mixing model using deuterium: application to the eastern Nevada Test Site and vicinity. J. Hydrol. 2008, 361(3-4):371-385.
7. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS), 2013a. Proyecto de Plan Hidrológico de la Cuenca del Segura. Anejo 02. Recursos Hídricos. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. http://www.chsegura.es/chs/planificacionydma/planificacion/.
8. Confederación Hidrográfica del Segura (CHS), 2013b. Trabajos de medida de caudales en manantiales y niveles hidrométricos y piezométricos en humedales de cuenca del Segura. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente. http://www.chsegura.es/export/descargas/cuenca/redesdecontrol/manantialesyhumedales/docsdescarga/ManantialesHumedales_201213_vp.pdf.
9. Criss R.E., Winston W.E. Do Nash values have value? Discussion and alternate proposals. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22(14):2723-2725.
10. Frances F., Velez J.I., Velez J.J. Split-parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. J. Hydrol. 2007, 332(1-2):226-240.
11. Fylstra D., Lasdon L., Watson J., Waren A. Design and use of the Microsoft excel solver. Interfaces 1998, 28(5):29-55.
12. Gleick P.H. Methods for evaluating the regional hydrologic impacts of global climatic changes. J. Hydrol. 1986, 88(1-2):97-116.
13. Herron N., Croke B. Including the influence of groundwater exchanges in a lumped rainfall-runoff model. Math. Comput. Simulat. 2009, 79(9):2689-2700.
14. Heuvelmans G., Muys B., Feyen J. Evaluation of hydrological model parameter transferability for simulating the impact of land use on catchment hydrology. Phys. Chem. Earth 2004, 29(11-12):739-747.
15. Hiscock K.M., Rivett M.O., Davison R.M. Sustainable Groundwater Development 2002, vol. 193. Geological Society Special Publications, London, pp. 344.
16. Hussien B.M., Fayyadh A.S. Impact of intense exploitation on the groundwater balance and flow within Mullusi aquifer (arid zone, west Iraq). Arabian J. Geosci. 2013, 6(7):2461-2482.
17. Karpouzos D.K., Baltas E.A., Kavalieratou S., Babajimopoulos C. A hydrological investigation using a lumped water balance model: the Aison River Basin case (Greece). Water Environ. J. 2011, 25(3):297-307.
18. Klemes V. Operational testing of hydrological simulation-models. Hydrol. Sci. J. 1986, 31(1):13-24.
19. Lasdon L.S., Waren A.D., Jain A., Ratner M. Design and testing of a generalized reduced gradient code for nonlinear programming. ACM T. Math. Software. 1978, 4(1):34-50.
20. Le Moine N., Andréassian V., Michel C., Perrin C. How to account for groundwater exchanges in rainfall-runoff models. MODSIM International Congress on Modelling and Simulation 2005, 2932-2938. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand. A. Zerger, R.M. Argent (Eds.).
21. Molnar P. Calibration. Watershed Modelling, SS 2011 2011, Institute of Environmental Engineering, Chair of Hydrology and Water Resources Management, ETH Zürich, Switzerland.
22. Moral F., Cruz-Sanjulian J.J., Olias M. Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the carbonate aquifers of Sierra de Segura (Betic Cordillera, southern Spain). J. Hydrol. 2008, 360(1-4):281-296.
23. Mouelhi S., Michel C., Perrin C., Andreassian V. Stepwise development of a two-parameter monthly water balance model. J. Hydrol. 2006, 318(1-4):200-214.
24. Mul M.L., Mutiibwa R.K., Foppen J.W.A., Uhlenbrook S., Savenije H.H.G. Identification of groundwater flow systems using geological mapping and chemical spring analysis in South Pare Mountains, Tanzania. Phys. Chem. Earth. 2007, 32(15-18):1015-1022.
25. Nash J.E., Sutcliffe J.V. River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. J. Hydrol. 1970, 10(3):282-290.
26. Oeztan M., Axelrod M. Sustainable transboundary groundwater management under shifting political scenarios: the Ceylanpinar Aquifer and Turkey-Syria relations. Water Int. 2011, 36(5):671-685.
27. Okkonen J., Klove B. A sequential modelling approach to assess groundwater-surface water resources in a snow dominated region of Finland. J. Hydrol. 2011, 411(1-2):91-107.
28. Pellicer-Martínez, F., Martínez-Paz, J.M., 2014. Contrast and transferability of parameters of lumped water balance models in the Segura River Basin (Spain). Water Environ. J. (in press). doi:10.1111/wej.12091.
29. Perni A., Martínez-Paz J., Martínez-Carrasco F. Social preferences and economic valuation for water quality and river restoration: the Segura River, Spain. Water Environ. J. 2012, 26:274-284.
30. Perrin C., Michel C., Andreassian V. Does a large number of parameters enhance model performance? Comparative assessment of common catchment model structures on 429 catchments. J. Hydrol. 2001, 242(3-4):275-301.
31. Ritter A., Munoz-Carpena R. Performance evaluation of hydrological models: statistical significance for reducing subjectivity in goodness-of-fit assessments. J. Hydrol. 2013, 480:33-45.
32. Thomas, H.A., 1981. Improved Methods for National Water Assessment. Report, Contract WR 15249270. U.S. Water Resources Council, Washington, DC.
33. Vandewiele G.L., Xu C.Y., Larwin N. Methodology and comparative-study of monthly water-balance models in Belgium, China and Burma. J. Hydrol. 1992, 134(1-4):315-347.
34. Vasiliades L., Loukas A., Liberis N. A water balance derived drought index for Pinios River Basin, Greece. Water Resour. Manage 2011, 25(4):1087-1101.
35. Vogel R.M., Sankarasubramanian A. Validation of a watershed model without calibration. Water Resour. Res. 2003, 39(10):1292. 10.1029/2002WR001940.
36. Weglarczyk S. The interdependence and applicability of some statistical quality measures for hydrological models. J. Hydrol. 1998, 206(1-2):98-103.
37. Wilby R.L. Uncertainty in water resource model parameters used for climate change impact assessment. Hydrol. Process. 2005, 19(16):3201-3219.
38. Wittenberg H. Baseflow recession and recharge as nonlinear storage processes. Hydrol. Process. 1999, 13(5):715-726.
39. World Meteorological Organization - WMO Intercomparison of conceptual models used in operational hydrological forecasting. Operational Hydrology Report No. 7 1975, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
40. World Meteorological Organization - WMO Intercomparison of models of snowmelt runoff. Operational Hydrology Report No. 23 1986, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
41. Wurbs R.A. Modeling river/reservoir system management, water allocation, and supply reliability. J. Hydrol. 2005, 300(1-4):100-113.
42. Xu C.Y., Singh V.P. A review on monthly water balance models for water resources investigations. Water Resour. Manag. 1998, 12(1):31-50.
43. Zhang L., Potter N., Hickel K., Zhang Y., Shao Q. Water balance modeling over variable time scales based on the Budyko framework - model development and testing. J. Hydrol. 2008, 360(1-4):117-131.