How do urban dwellers react to potential landscape changes in recreation areas? A case study with particular focus on the introduction of dendromass in the Hamburg Metropolitan Region

IForest

Volumn 7, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 423-433

  Boll, Thiemen ^a   von Haaren, Christina ^a   Albert, Christian ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Agriculture; Dendromass; Forestry; Landscape changes; Landscape character; Recreation; Short rotation coppice; Visual landscape

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908085596     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1173-007     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Antrop M (2004). Landscape change and the urbanization process in Europe. Landscape and Urban Planning 67 (1-4): 9-26. - doi: 10.1016/S01 69-2046(03)00026-4
2. Appleton J (1975). The experience of landscape. Wiley, London, UK, pp. 296.
3. Balling J.D., Falk JH (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior 14 (1): 5-28. - doi: 10.117 7/0013916582141001
4. Baum C., Leinweber P, Weih M, Lamersdorf N, Dimitriou I (2009). Effects of short rotation coppice with willows and poplar on soil ecology. Landbauforschung vTI Agriculture and Forestry Research 3 (59): 183-196. [online] URL: http:// www.bfafh.de/bibl/lbf-pdf/lbf-dl.htm
5. Bemmann A (2010). AGROWOOD. Kurzumtriebsplantagen in Deutschland und Europaische perspektiven [AGROWOOD. Short rotation coppice in Germany and European perspectives]. Weisensee-Verlag (Okologie), Berlin, Germany, pp. 342. [in German]
6. BfN (2012a). Landschaftssteckbriefe [Landscape characteristics]. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, web site. [in German] [online] URL: http://www.bfn.de/0311_landschaft en.html
7. BfN (2012b). Landschaftstypen [Landscape types]. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, web site. [in German] [online] URL: http://www.bfn.de/0311_landschaftstypen.html
8. BfN (2012c). Schutzwurdige Landschaften [Landscapes deserving protection]. German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, web site. [in German] [online] URL: http://www.bfn.de/0311 _schutzw_landsch.html
9. BMU (2008). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland. Ergebnisse einer reprasentativen Bevolkerungsumfrage [Environmental awareness in Germany. Results of a representative public survey]. German Federal Ministry for Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety, pp. 62. [in German] [online] URL: http://www.umweltbundesamt. de/sites/default/files/medien/publikation/ long/3678.pdf
10. Burggraaff P., Kleefeld KD (1998). Historische Kulturlandschaft und Kulturlandschaftselemente Teil I. Bundesubersicht. Teil II: Leitfaden [Historical cultural landscapes and cultural landscape elements]. Angewandte Landschaftsokologie 20, Bonn-Bad Godesberg, Germany, pp. 320. [in German]
11. Dockerty T., Lovett A, Appleton K, Sunnenberg G (2009). Public attitudes to biomass energy crops and their visual impacts. RELU biomass subproject report. University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK pp. 84. [online] URL: http://www.es ds.ac.uk/doc/6615/mrdoc/pdf/6615uguide.pdf
12. European Commission (2007). Growing regions, growing Europe. Fourth report on economic and social cohesion, Office for Official Publications, European Communities, Luxembourg, pp. 200.
13. Federal Statistical Office (2010). Destatis regional atlas. Joint product by the statistical offices of the Federation and the Lander, Web site. [online] URL: https://www.destatis.de/onlineatlas
14. Franke U (2008). Thema: Landschaftsbild. Landschaft lesen. Impulse zur Landschaftsasthetik, Naturwahrnehmung und Landschaftsbildbewertung fur die norddeutsche Kulturlandschaft [Topic: Visual Landscape. Reading Landscape. Impulses for landscape aesthetics, perception of nature and landscape character assessment for the northern German cultural landscape]. Oceano, Schwerin, Germany, pp. 94. [in German] [online] URL: http://www.ink-landschaft.de/index. php
15. Hendriks K., Stobbelaar DJ, van Mansvelt JD (2000). The appearance of agriculture: an assessment of the quality of landscape of both organic and conventional horticultural farms in West Friesland. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 77 (1-2): 157-175. - doi: 10.1016/S0167- 8809(99)00100-0
16. Hunziker M., Felber P, Gehring K, Buchecker M, Bauer N., Kienast F (2008). Evaluation of landscape change by different social groups. Results of two empirical studies in Switzerland. Mountain Research and Development 28: 140-147. - doi: 10.1659/mrd.0952
17. Kohler B., Preiss A (2000). Erfassung und Bewertung des Landschaftsbildes. Grundlagen und Methoden zur Bearbeitung des Schutzguts "Vielfalt, Eigenart und Schonheit von Natur und Landschaft" in der Planung [Assessment of the visual landscape. Basics and methods to handle "diversity, peculiarity and beauty of nature and landscape" in planning practice.]. Informationsdienst Naturschutz Niedersachsen 20 (1): 1-60. [in German]
18. Kuhne O (2006). Landschaft in der Postmoderne. Das Beispiel des Saarlandes [Postmodern Landscape. The example of the Saarland]. Deutscher Universitatsverlag, Wiesbaden, Germany, pp. 348. [in German] Lindemann-Matthies P, Briegel R, Schupbach B
19. Junge X (2010). Aesthetic preference for a Swiss alpine landscape: The impact of different agricultural land-use with different biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning 98 (2): 99-109. - doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.07.015
20. Lindenau G (2002). Die Entwicklung der Agrarlandschaften in Sudbayern und ihre Beurteilung durch die Bevolkerung [The development of the agricultural areas in southern Bavaria and their appreciation by the public]. Franziska Land Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 304. [in German]
21. Nohl W (2001). Sustainable landscape use and aesthetic perception-preliminary reflections on future landscape aesthetics. Landscape and Urban Planning 54 (1-4): 223-237. - doi: 10.1016/ S0169-2046(01)00138-4
22. Nitsch J., Pregger T, Scholz Y, Naegler T, Sterner M, Gerhardt N, van Oehsen A, Pape C, Saint- Drenan, YM (2010). Langfristszenarien und Strategien fur den Ausbau der erneuerbaren Energien in Deutschland bei Berucksichtigung der Entwicklung in Europa und global. Leitstudie 2010 [Long-term scenarios and strategies for the expansion of renewable energies in Germany]. DLR, Fraunhofer IWES, IFNE, pp. 201. [in German]
23. Palang H., Soovali H, Antrop M, Setten G (2010). European rural landscapes. Persistence and change in a globalising environment. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 482.
24. Pott R (1999). Luneburger Heide, Wendland und Nationalpark Mittleres Elbtal [Luneburg Heath, Wendland and national park Mittleres Elbtal]. Ulmer, Stuttgart, Germany, pp. 256. [in German]
25. Schupbach B., Junge X, Briegel R, Lindemann- Matthies P., Walter T (2009). Aesthetische Bewertung landwirtschaftlicher Kulturen durch die Bevolkerung [Aesthetic assessment of agricultural crops by the public]. ART-Schriftenreihe 10, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 122. [in German]
26. Statistical Office North (2009). Statistical Office for Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein. Web site. [online] URL: http://www.statistik-nord.de/
27. Strohm K., Schweinle J, Liesebach M, Osterburg B, Rodl A, Baum S, Nieberg H, Bolte A, Walter K (2012). Kurzumtriebsplantagen aus okologischer und okonomischer Sicht [Short rotation coppice from an ecological and economic perspective]. Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarokonomie, 2012.6, Braunschweig, Germany, pp. 86. [in German]
28. Thran D., Edel M, Pfeifer J, Ponitka J, Rode M, Knispel S (2011). Identifizierung strategischer Hemmnisse und Entwicklung von Losungsansatzen zur Reduzierung der Nutzungskonkurrenz beim weiteren Ausbau der Biomassenutzung [Identification of strategic barriers and development of possible approaches to reduce competing uses in the bioenergy sector]. DBFZ Report Nr. 4 (4), Leipzig, Germany, pp. 193. [in German]
29. TLL (2007). Abschlussbericht Verbundvorhaben: Energiepflanzen fur die Biogasproduktion [Final report: Energy crops for biogas production]. Agricultural Institute of the State of Thuringen, Jena, Germany, pp. 72. [in German]
30. Tuan YF (1977). Space and place. The perspective of experience. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN, USA, pp. 496.
31. Tveit MS (2009). Indicators of visual scale as predictors of landscape preference; a comparison between groups. Journal of Environmental Management 90 (9): 2882-2888. - doi: 10.1016/j. jenvman.2007.12.021
32. Ulrich RS (1986). Human responses to vegetation and landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 13: 29-44. - doi: 10.1016/0169-2046(86)90005- 8