Frequency-dependent population dynamics: Effect of sex ratio and mating system on the elasticity of population growth rate

Theoretical Population Biology

Volumn 97, Issue , 2014, Pages 49-56

  Haridas, C V ^a   Eager, Eric Alan ^b   Rebarber, Richard ^c   Tenhumberg, Brigitte ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN LA CROSSE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Elasticity; Frequency dependence; Mating system; Population growth; Sex ratio; Two sex model

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUE; FREQUENCY DEPENDENCE; GROWTH RATE; POLYGYNY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEX RATIO; SURVIVAL;

ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; MALE; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION GROWTH; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; FEMALE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POPULATION GROWTH; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 84908056326     PISSN: 00405809     EISSN: 10960325     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.08.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bessa-Gomes C., Legendre S., Clobert J. Allee effects, mating systems and the extinction risk in populations with two sexes. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:802-812.
2. Bessa-Gomes C., Legendre S., Clobert J. Discrete two-sex models of population dynamics: On modelling the mating function. Acta Oecologica 2010, 36:439-445.
3. Caswell H., Weeks D.E. Two-sex models: chaos, extinction, and other dynamic consequences of sex. Amer. Nat. 1988, 128:707-735.
4. Caswell H. Matrix population models. Construction, analysis, and interpretation 2001, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA. 2nd ed.
5. Caswell H. Perturbation analysis of nonlinear matrix population models. Demographic Res. 2008, 18:27-83.
6. Charlesworth B. Evolution in Age Structured Populations 1994, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
7. Donald P.F. Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis 2007, 149:671-692.
8. Gaillard J.M., Yoccoz N.G., Lebreton J.D., Bonenfant C., Devillard S., Loison A., Pontier D., Allaine D. Generation time: a reliable metric to measure life-history variation among mammalian populations. Amer. Nat. 2005, 166:119-123.
9. Haridas C.V., Tuljapurkar S. Time, transients and elasticity. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:1143-1153.
10. Horev A., Yosef R., Tryjanowski P., Ovadia O. Consequences of variation in male harem size to population persistence: Modeling poaching and extinction risk of Bengal tigers (Panthera tigris). Biol. Cons. 2012, 147:22-31.
11. Jenouvrier S., Caswell H., Barbraud C., Weimerskirch H. Mating behavior, population growth, and the operational sex ratio: a periodic two-sex model approach. Amer. Nat. 2010, 175(6):739-752.
12. Kareiva P., Marvier M., McClure M. Recovery and management options for spring/summer Chinook salmon in the Columbia river basin. Science 2000, 290:977-979.
13. Langvatn R., Loison A. Consequences of harvesting on age structure, sex ratio and population dynamics of red deer Cervus elaphus in central Norway. Wildl. Biol. 1999, 5:213-223.
14. Le Galliard J.-F., Fitze P.S., Ferriere R., Clobert J. Sex ratio bias, male aggression, and population collapse in lizards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102(50):18231-18236.
15. Lindström J., Kokko H. Sexual reproduction and population dynamics: the role of polygyny and demographic sex differences. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 1998, 265:483-488.
16. McDonald D.B. Demographic consequences of sexual selection in the long-tailed manakin. Behav. Ecol. 1993, 4:297-309.
17. McFarland D.D. Comparison of alternative marriage models. Population Dynamics 1972, 89-106. Academic Press, New York. T.N.E. Greville (Ed.).
18. Miller T.E.X., Inouye B. Confronting two-sex demographic models with data. Ecology 2011, 92(11):2141-2151.
19. Morales M.B., Bretagnolle V., Arroyo B. Viability of the endangered little bustard Tetrax tetrax population of western France. Biodivers. Conserv. 2005, 14:3135-3150.
20. Morris W.F., Doak D.F. Quantitative Conservation Biology: Theory and Practice of Population Viability Analysis 2002, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
21. Mysterud A., Coulson T., Stenseth N.C. The role of males in the dynamics of ungulate populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 2002, 71:907-915.
22. Nelson N.J., Keall S.N., Pledger S., Daugherty C.H. Male-biased sex ratio in a small tuatara population. J. Biogeography 2002, 29:633-640.
23. Nussbaum R.D. Iterated nonlinear maps and Hilbert's projective metric. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 1988, 75(391). Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
24. Rankin D.J., Kokko H. Do males matter? The role of males in population dynamics. Oikos 2007, 116:335-348.
25. Rosen K.H. Mathematical models for polygamous mating systems. Math. Model. 1983, 4:27-39.
26. Shelton A.O. The ecological and evolutionary drivers of female-biased sex ratios: two-sex models of perennial seagrasses. Amer. Nat. 2010, 175(3):302-315.
27. Stearns S.C. The Evolution of Life Histories 1992, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
28. Tuljapurkar S., Horvitz C.C., Pascarella J.B. The Many Growth Rates and elasticities of Populations in Random environments. Amer. Nat. 2003, 162:489-502.
29. Veran S., Beissinger S.R. Demographic origins of skewed operational and adult sex ratios: perturbation analyses of two-sex models. Ecol. Lett. 2009, 12:129-143.