Global fits of the dark matter-nucleon effective interactions

Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics

Volumn 2014, Issue 9, 2014, Pages

  Catena, Riccardo ^a   Gondolo, Paolo ^b  

^a Institut Theoretische Physik   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

dark matter experiments; dark matter theory

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908040495     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14757516     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2014/09/045     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Planck collaboration, P.A.R. Ade et al., 2014 Planck 2013 results. XVI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys. [1303.5076]
2. F. Zwicky, 1933 Die Rotverschiebung von extragalaktischen Nebeln Helv. Phys. Acta 6 110
3. E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner, 1990 The Early Universe Front. Phys. 69 1
4. G. Jungman, M. Kamionkowski and K. Griest, 1996 Supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rept. 267 195 [hep-ph/9506380]
5. G. Bertone, D. Hooper and J. Silk, 2005 Particle dark matter: Evidence, candidates and constraints, Phys. Rept. 405 279 [hep-ph/0404175]
6. M. Kuhlen, M. Vogelsberger and R. Angulo, 2012 Numerical Simulations of the Dark Universe: State of the Art and the Next Decade, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 50 [1209.5745]
7. L.E. Strigari, 2013 Galactic Searches for Dark Matter, Phys. Rept. 531 1 [1211.7090]
8. M.W. Goodman and E. Witten, 1985 Detectability of Certain Dark Matter Candidates, Phys. Rev. D 31 3059
9. L. Baudis, 2012 Direct dark matter detection: the next decade, Phys. Dark Univ. 1 94 [1211.7222]
10. D.G. Cerdeno and A.M. Green, Direct detection of WIMPs, [1002.1912]
11. E. Del Nobile, G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, 2014 Update on Light WIMP Limits: LUX, lite and Light J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014 03 014 [1311.4247]
12. M.T. Frandsen, F. Kahlhoefer, C. McCabe, S. Sarkar and K. Schmidt-Hoberg, 2013 The unbearable lightness of being: CDMS versus XENON J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 07 023 [1304.6066]
13. T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, 2011 Dark Matter attempts for CoGeNT and DAMA J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 08 008 [1106.6241]
14. M. Farina, D. Pappadopulo, A. Strumia and T. Volansky, 2011 Can CoGeNT and DAMA Modulations Be Due to Dark Matter? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 11 010 [1107.0715]
15. J. Kopp, T. Schwetz and J. Zupan, 2010 Global interpretation of direct Dark Matter searches after CDMS-II results J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 02 014 [0912.4264]
16. C. Savage, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and K. Freese, 2011 XENON10/100 dark matter constraints in comparison with CoGeNT and DAMA: examining the Leff dependence, Phys. Rev. D 83 055002 [1006.0972]
17. E.A. Baltz and P. Gondolo, 2004 Markov chain Monte Carlo exploration of minimal supergravity with implications for dark matter J. High Energy Phys. JHEP10(2004)052 [hep-ph/0407039]
18. J.R. Ellis, K.A. Olive, Y. Santoso and V.C. Spanos, 2005 Update on the direct detection of supersymmetric dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 71 095007 [hep-ph/0502001]
19. R. Catena and L. Covi, 2014 SUSY dark matter(s), Eur. Phys. J. C 74 2703 [1310.4776]
20. S. Chang, A. Pierce and N. Weiner, 2010 Momentum Dependent Dark Matter Scattering J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 01 006 [0908.3192]
21. J.L. Feng, J. Kumar, D. Marfatia and D. Sanford, 2011 Isospin-Violating Dark Matter, Phys. Lett. B 703 124 [1102.4331]
22. N. Fornengo, P. Panci and M. Regis, 2011 Long-Range Forces in Direct Dark Matter Searches, Phys. Rev. D 84 115002 [1108.4661]
23. E. Del Nobile, G.B. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, 2014 Direct detection of Light Anapole and Magnetic Dipole DM J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014 06 002 [1401.4508]
24. M.I. Gresham and K.M. Zurek, 2014 Light Dark Matter Anomalies After LUX, Phys. Rev. D 89 016017 [1311.2082]
25. Z.-L. Liang and Y.-L. Wu, 2014 Direct detection and solar capture of spin-dependent dark matter, Phys. Rev. D 89 013010 [1308.5897]
26. A. De Simone, G.F. Giudice and A. Strumia, 2014 Benchmarks for Dark Matter Searches at the LHC J. High Energy Phys. JHEP06(2014)081 [1402.6287]
27. A.H.G. Peter, V. Gluscevic, A.M. Green, B.J. Kavanagh and S.K. Lee, WIMP physics with ensembles of direct-detection experiments, [1310.7039]
28. E. Del Nobile, G. Gelmini, P. Gondolo and J.-H. Huh, 2013 Generalized Halo Independent Comparison of Direct Dark Matter Detection Data J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 10 048 [1306.5273]
29. J.F. Cherry, M.T. Frandsen and I.M. Shoemaker, Halo Independent Direct Detection of Momentum-Dependent Dark Matter, [1405.1420]
30. A.L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, Model Independent Direct Detection Analyses, [1211.2818]
31. A.L. Fitzpatrick, W. Haxton, E. Katz, N. Lubbers and Y. Xu, 2013 The Effective Field Theory of Dark Matter Direct Detection J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 02 004 [1203.3542]
32. N. Anand, A.L. Fitzpatrick and W.C. Haxton, 2014 Model-independent WIMP Scattering Responses and Event Rates: A Mathematica Package for Experimental Analysis, Phys. Rev. C 89 065501 [1308.6288]
33. J. Fan, M. Reece and L.-T. Wang, 2010 Non-relativistic effective theory of dark matter direct detection J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 11 042 [1008.1591]
34. M. Cirelli, E. Del Nobile and P. Panci, 2013 Tools for model-independent bounds in direct dark matter searches J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 10 019 [1307.5955]
35. P. Panci, 2014 New Directions in Direct Dark Matter Searches, Adv. High Energy Phys. 2014 681312 [1402.1507]
36. M.I. Gresham and K.M. Zurek, 2014 On the Effect of Nuclear Response Functions in Dark Matter Direct Detection, Phys. Rev. D 89 123521 [1401.3739]
37. M.R. Buckley, 2013 Using effective operators to understand CoGeNT and CDMS-Si signals, Phys. Rev. D 88 055028 [1308.4146]
38. V. Cirigliano, M.L. Graesser, G. Ovanesyan and I.M. Shoemaker, Shining LUX on Isospin-Violating Dark Matter Beyond Leading Order, [1311.5886]
39. N. Bozorgnia, R. Catena and T. Schwetz, 2013 Anisotropic dark matter distribution functions and impact on WIMP direct detection J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 12 050 [1310.0468]
40. R. Trotta, R.R. de Austri and L. Roszkowski, 2007 Prospects for direct dark matter detection in the Constrained MSSM, New Astron. Rev. 51 316 [astro-ph/0609126]
41. Y. Akrami, C. Savage, P. Scott, J. Conrad and J. Edsjo, 2011 How well will ton-scale dark matter direct detection experiments constrain minimal supersymmetry? J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 04 012 [1011.4318]
42. Y. Akrami, C. Savage, P. Scott, J. Conrad and J. Edsjo, 2011 Statistical coverage for supersymmetric parameter estimation: a case study with direct detection of dark matter J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 07 002 [1011.4297]
43. M. Pato, L. Baudis, G. Bertone, R. Ruiz de Austri, L.E. Strigari et al., 2011 Complementarity of Dark Matter Direct Detection Targets, Phys. Rev. D 83 083505 [1012.3458]
44. C. Arina, J. Hamann and Y.Y.Y. Wong, 2011 A Bayesian view of the current status of dark matter direct searches J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2011 09 022 [1105.5121]
45. C. Arina, J. Hamann, R. Trotta and Y.Y.Y. Wong, 2012 Evidence for dark matter modulation in CoGeNT J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012 03 008 [1111.3238]
46. A.H.G. Peter, 2011 WIMP astronomy and particle physics with liquid-noble and cryogenic direct-detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 83 125029 [1103.5145]
47. C. Arina, 2012 Chasing a consistent picture for dark matter direct searches, Phys. Rev. D 86 123527 [1210.4011]
48. C. Strege, R. Trotta, G. Bertone, A.H.G. Peter and P. Scott, 2012 Fundamental statistical limitations of future dark matter direct detection experiments, Phys. Rev. D 86 023507 [1201.3631]
49. C. Arina, Bayesian analysis of multiple direct detection experiments, [1310.5718]
50. D.G. Cerdeño et al., 2013 Complementarity of dark matter direct detection: the role of bolometric targets J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2013 07 028 [Erratum ibid 1309 (2013) E01] [1304.1758]
51. D.G. Cerdeño et al., 2014 Scintillating bolometers: a key for determining WIMP parameters, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 1443009 [1403.3539]
52. G. Cowan, 1998 Statistical Data Analysis, Oxford Universitiy Press,, pg. 1-197
53. K. Freese, M. Lisanti and C. Savage, 2013 Annual Modulation of Dark Matter: A Review, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85 1561 [1209.3339]
54. F. Feroz, K. Cranmer, M. Hobson, R. Ruiz de Austri and R. Trotta, 2011 Challenges of Profile Likelihood Evaluation in Multi-Dimensional SUSY Scans J. High Energy Phys. JHEP06(2011)042 [1101.3296]
55. 3 I Bubble Chamber Operated in a Deep Underground Site, Phys. Rev. D 86 052001 [1204.3094]
56. 19F from PICASSO, Phys. Lett. B 711 153 [1202.1240]
57. M. Felizardo et al., 2012 Final Analysis and Results of the Phase II SIMPLE Dark Matter Search, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 201302 [1106.3014]
58. C.E. Aalseth et al., Maximum Likelihood Signal Extraction Method Applied to 3.4 years of CoGeNT Data, [1401.6234]
59. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson and M. Bridges, 2009 MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 398 1601 [0809.3437]
60. F. Feroz and M.P. Hobson, 2008 Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 384 449 [0704.3704]
61. F. Feroz, M.P. Hobson, E. Cameron and A.N. Pettitt, Importance Nested Sampling and the MultiNest Algorithm, [1306.2144]
62. A. Lewis and S. Bridle, 2002 Cosmological parameters from CMB and other data: A Monte Carlo approach, Phys. Rev. D 66 103511 [astro-ph/0205436]
63. R.R. de Austri, R. Trotta and L. Roszkowski, 2006 A Markov chain Monte Carlo analysis of the CMSSM J. High Energy Phys. JHEP05(2006)002 [hep-ph/0602028]
64. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., 2010 Dark Matter Search Results from the CDMS II Experiment, Science 327 1619 [0912.3592]
65. CDMS-II collaboration, Z. Ahmed et al., 2011 Results from a Low-Energy Analysis of the CDMS II Germanium Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 131302 [1011.2482]
66. SuperCDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., 2014 Search for Low-Mass WIMPs with SuperCDMS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 241302 [1402.7137]
67. SuperCDMS collaboration, R. Agnese et al., 2014 Search for Low-Mass Weakly Interacting Massive Particles Using Voltage-Assisted Calorimetric Ionization Detection in the SuperCDMS Experiment, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 041302 [1309.3259]
68. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., 2012 Dark Matter Results from 225 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109 181301 [1207.5988]
69. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., 2011 Dark Matter Results from 100 Live Days of XENON100 Data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 131302 [1104.2549]
70. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., 2011 Likelihood Approach to the First Dark Matter Results from XENON100, Phys. Rev. D 84 052003 [1103.0303]
71. XENON10 collaboration, J. Angle et al., 2011 A search for light dark matter in XENON10 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 051301 [Erratum ibid 110 (2013) 249901] [1104.3088]
72. J.D. Lewin and P.F. Smith, 1996 Review of mathematics, numerical factors and corrections for dark matter experiments based on elastic nuclear recoil, Astropart. Phys. 6 87
73. LUX collaboration, D.S. Akerib et al., 2014 First results from the LUX dark matter experiment at the Sanford Underground Research Facility, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 091303 [1310.8214]
74. DAMA, LIBRA collaborations, R. Bernabei et al., 2010 New results from DAMA/LIBRA, Eur. Phys. J. C 67 39 [1002.1028]
75. CoGeNT collaboration, C.E. Aalseth et al., Search for An Annual Modulation in Three Years of CoGeNT Dark Matter Detector Data, [1401.3295]
76. J.H. Davis, C. McCabe and C. Boehm, 2014 Quantifying the evidence for Dark Matter in CoGeNT data J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2014 08 014 [1405.0495]
77. XENON100 collaboration, E. Aprile et al., 2013 Limits on spin-dependent WIMP-nucleon cross sections from 225 live days of XENON100 data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 021301 [1301.6620]
78. R. Catena and P. Ullio, 2010 A novel determination of the local dark matter density J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2010 08 004 [0907.0018]
79. R. Catena and P. Ullio, 2012 The local dark matter phase-space density and impact on WIMP direct detection J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2012 05 005 [1111.3556]