Influence of coronary anatomy and SYNTAX score on the variations in revascularization strategies for patients with multivessel disease

Canadian Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 30, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1155-1161

  Schwalm, Jon David R ^a   Wijeysundera, Harindra C ^b,c   Tu, Jack V ^b,c   Guo, Helen ^c   Kingsbury, Kori J ^d   Natarajan, Madhu K ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c INSTITUTE FOR CLINICAL EVALUATIVE SCIENCES   (Canada)

^d Cardiac Care Network of Ontario   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CARDIAC PATIENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; SYNTAX SCORE; UNSTABLE ANGINA PECTORIS; VASCULAR DISEASE; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

AGED; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL REVASCULARIZATION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS;

EID: 84908037342     PISSN: 0828282X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Tu J.V., Ko D.T., Guo H., et al. Determinants of variations in coronary revascularization practices. CMAJ 2012, 184:179-186.
2. Weintraub W.S., Karlsberg R.P., Tcheng J.E., et al. ACCF/AHA 2011 key data elements and definitions of a base cardiovascular vocabulary for electronic health records: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards. JAm Coll Cardiol 2011, 58:202-222.
3. Ong A.T., Serruys P.W., Mohr F.W., et al. The SYNergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with TAXus and cardiac surgery (SYNTAX) study: design, rationale, and run-in phase. Am Heart J 2006, 151:1194-1204.
4. SYNTAX Score. Available at: . Accessed April 1, 2011. http://syntaxscore.com.
5. Cicchetti D.V., Allison T. Anew procedure for assessing reliability of scoring EEG sleep recordings. Am J EEG Technol 1971, 11:101-109.
6. Landis J.R., Koch G.G. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977, 33:159-174.
7. Garg S., Girasis C., Sarno G., et al. The SYNTAX score revisited: a reassessment of the SYNTAX score reproducibility. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2010, 75:946-952.
8. Steigen T.K., Claudio C., Abbott D., et al. Angiographic core laboratory reproducibility analyses: implications for planning clinical trials using coronary angiography and left ventriculography end-points. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2008, 24:453-462.
9. Moer R., van Weert A.W., Myreng Y., Molstad P. Variability of quantitative coronary angiography: an evaluation of on-site versus core laboratory analysis. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2003, 19:457-464.
10. Fisher L.D., Judkins M.P., Lesperance J., et al. Reproducibility of coronary arteriographic reading in the coronary artery surgery study (CASS). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1982, 8:565-575.
11. Mohr F.W., Morice M.C., Kappetein A.P., et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 2013, 381:629-638.
12. Wijns W., Kolh P., Danchin N., et al. Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J 2010, 31:2501-2555.