Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence, stalking, and intimate partner violence victimization - national intimate partner and sexual violence survey, united states, 2011

MMWR Surveillance Summaries

Volumn 63, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 1-18

  Breiding, Matthew J ^a   Smith, Sharon G ^a   Basile, Kathleen C ^a   Walters, Mikel L ^a   Chen, Jieru ^a   Merrick, Melissa T ^a  

^a NATIONAL CENTER FOR INJURY PREVENTION AND CONTROL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CRIME VICTIM; ETHNIC GROUP; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PARTNER VIOLENCE; PREVALENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL CRIME; SEXUALITY; STALKING; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CRIME VICTIMS; DATA COLLECTION; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; SEX DISTRIBUTION; SEX OFFENSES; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SPOUSE ABUSE; STALKING; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84908027374     PISSN: 15460738     EISSN: 15458636     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Black MC. Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences: implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011;5:428-39.
2. Coker AL, Davis KE, Arias I, et al. Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. Am J Prev Med 2002;23:260-8.
3. Tjaden P, Thoennes N. Extent, nature, and consequences of intimate partner violence: findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. (NIJ Publication No. 181867). Washington, DC: US Department of Justice; 2000.
4. Smith PH, White JW, Holland LJ. A longitudinal perspective on dating violence among adolescent and college-age women. Am J Public Health 2003;93:1104-9.
5. The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 7th ed. Deerfield, IL: The American Association for Public Opinion Research; 2011.
6. Breiding MJ, Basile KC, Smith SG, Black MC, Mahendra RR. Intimate partner violence surveillance: uniform definitions and recommended data elements, version 2.0. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. In press.
7. Straus MA, Hamby SL, Boney-McCoy S, Sugarman DB. The revised Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS2). J Fam Issues 1996;17:283-316.
8. US Census Bureau. 2010 census summary file 1. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2011. Available at http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/wc_dec.xhtml.
9. US Census Bureau. 2006-2010 American Community Survey 5-year estimates. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2011. Available at http://factfinder2.census.gov.
10. US Census Bureau. 2010 American Community Survey 1-year estimates. Washington, DC: US Census Bureau; 2011. Available at http://factfinder2.census.gov.
11. Black MC, Basile KC, Breiding MJ, et al. The National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2011.
12. Breiding MJ, Chen J, Black MC. Intimate partner violence in the United States-2010. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control; 2014.
13. Breiding MJ, Black MC, Ryan GW. Prevalence and risk factors of intimate partner violence in eighteen US states/territories, 2005. Am J Prev Med 2008;34:112-8.
14. Bachman R, Zaykowski H, Kallmyer R, Poteyeva M, Lanier C. Violence against American Indian and Alaska Native women and the criminal justice response: what is known. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice; 2008.
15. Bufkin J, Eschholz S. Images of sex and rape: a content analysis of popular film. Violence Against Women 2000;6:1317-44.
16. Ross K, Byerly C. Women and media: international perspectives. Malden, MA: Blackwell 2004.
17. Foshee VA, Bauman KE, Ennett ST, Suchindran C, Benefield T, Linder GF. Assessing the effects of the dating violence prevention program "Safe Dates" using random coefficient regression modeling. Prev Sci 2005;6:245-50.
18. Schwartz MD. Methodological issues in the use of survey data for measuring and characterizing violence against women. Violence Against Women 2000;6:815-38.