Household transitions to energy efficient lighting

Energy Economics

Volumn 46, Issue , 2014, Pages 151-160

  Mills, Bradford ^a   Schleich, Joachim ^a,b,c  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^c GRENOBLE ECOLE DE MANAGEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Energy efficient lamps; Household adoption; Rebound effect

Indexed keywords

INCANDESCENT LAMPS; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; LUMINANCE;

COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMP; ENERGY EFFICIENT; ENERGY EFFICIENT LIGHTING; ENVIRONMENTAL FRIENDLINESS; HOUSEHOLD ADOPTION; HOUSEHOLD ELECTRICITY CONSUMPTION; MODEL RESULTS; REBOUND EFFECT;

ENERGY EFFICIENCY;

ELECTRICITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; HOUSEHOLD ENERGY; LIGHT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION;

GERMANY;

EID: 84908001781     PISSN: 01409883     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2014.08.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Allcott H., Mullainathan S., Taubinsky D. Externalities, internalities, and the targeting of energy policy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 17977 2012, (Cambridge, MA).
2. Bertoldi P., Hirl B., Labanca N. Energy Efficiency Status Report 2012 - Electricity Consumption and Efficiency Trends in the EU-27 2012, European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Energy and Transport, Ispra, Italy.
3. Borenstein S. A microeconomic framework for evaluating energy efficiency rebound and some implications. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Number 19044 2013, (Cambridge, MA).
4. Bourguignon F., Fournier M., Gurgand M. Selection bias corrections based on the multinomial logit model: Monte Carlo comparisons. Econometrica 2007, 21(1):174-205.
5. Brookes L. The greenhouse effect: the fallacies in the energy efficiency solution. Energy Policy 1990, 18(2):199-201.
6. Chitnis M., Sorrell S., Druckman A., Firth S.K., Jackson T. Turning lights into flights: estimating direct and indirect rebound effects for UK households. Energy Policy 2013, 55:234-250.
7. CLASP Estimating Potential Additional Energy Savings from Upcoming Revisions to Existing Regulations Under the Ecodesign and Energy Labelling Directives: A Contribution to the Evidence Base 2013, (Report published 18. February 2013).
8. de Almeida A. Residential Monitoring to Decrease Energy Use and Carbon Emissions in Europe (REMODECE). Deliverable D9: Report with the Results of the Surveys Based on Questionnaires for all Countries 2008, (Downloaded from:www.isr.uc.pt/~remodece).
9. de Almeida A., Zissis G., Quicheron M., Bertoldi P. Accelerating the Deployment of Solit State Lighting (SSL) in Europe 2013, Joint Research Center, European Union.
10. di Maria C., Ferreira S., Lazarova E. Shedding light on the light bulb puzzle: the role of attitudes and perceptions in the adoption of energy efficient light bulbs. Scott. J. Polit. Econ. 2010, 57(1):48-67.
11. Dubin J.A., McFadden D.L. An econometric analysis of residential electrical appliance holdings and consumption. Econometrica 1984, 52(2):345-362.
12. European Commission Green Paper: Lighting the Future, Accelerating the Deployment of Innovative Lighting Technologies 2011, The European Commission, Brussels, (15.12.2011, COM(2011) 889 final).
13. European Commission European Commission, Joint Research Centre, European LED Quality Charter 2011, (February 2011).
14. Fouquet R., Pearson P.J.G. Seven centuries of energy services: the price and use of light in the United Kingdom (1300-2000). Energy J. 2006, 27(1):139-177.
15. Fouquet R., Pearson P.J.G. The long run demand for lighting: elasticities and rebound effects in different phases of economic development. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 2012, 1(1):83-100.
16. Frondel M., Lohmann S. The European Commission's light bulb decree: another costly regulation?. Energy Policy 2011, 39:3177-3181.
17. Frondel M., Ritter N., Vance C. Heterogeneity in the rebound effect: further evidence for Germany. Energy Econ. 2012, 34(2):461-467.
18. Frondel M., Peters J., Vance C. Identifying the rebound: evidence from a German household panel. Energy J. 2008, 29(4):154-163.
19. Greening L.A., Greene D.L., Difiglio C. Energy efficiency and consumption - the rebound effect - a survey. Energy Policy 2000, 28(6):389-401.
20. Heckman J.J. Sample selection as a specification error. Econometrica 1979, 47(1):153-161.
21. IEA Phase out of ILs. Implications for International Supply and Demand for Regulatory Compliant Lamps. Information Paper 2010, OECD/IEA, Paris.
22. IEA (IEA 18 February 2013). http://mappingandbenchmarking.iea-4e.org/.
23. Kanter J. Europe's Ban on Old-Style Bulbs Begins 2009, New York Times, (July 31, http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/01/business/energy-environment/01iht-bulb.html).
24. Khazzoom J.D. Economic implications of mandated efficiency in standards for household appliances. Energy J. 1980, 1(4):21-40.
25. Khazzoom J.D. Energy savings resulting from the adoption of more efficient appliances. Energy J. 1987, 8(4):85-89.
26. Khazzoom J.D. Energy savings from more efficient appliances: a rejoinder. Energy J. 1989, 10(1):157-166.
27. Kumar A., Jain S.K., Bansal N.K. Disseminating energy-efficient technologies: a case study of compact fluorescent lamps in India. Energy Policy 2003, 31:59-272.
28. Lee L.F. Generalized econometric models with selectivity. Econometrica 1983, 51(2):507-512.
29. Madlener R., Alcott B. Energy rebound and economic growth: a review of the main issues and research needs. Energy 2009, 34:370-376.
30. McKinsey Lighting the Way: Perspectives on the Global Lighting Market 2012, McKinsey&Company, (August 2012). 2nd edition.
31. Mills B., Schleich J. Why don't households see the light? Explaining the diffusion of compact fluorescent lamps. Resour. Energy Econ. 2010, 32(3):363-378.
32. Mills B., Schleich J. Residential energy-efficient technology adoption, energy conservation, knowledge, and attitudes: an analysis of European countries. Energy Policy 2012, 49:616-628.
33. Rogers E.M. Diffusion of Innovations 2003, Free Press, New York.
34. Schleich J., Mills B., Dütschke E. A brighter future? Quantifying the rebound effect in energy efficient lighting. Energy Policy 2014, 72:35-42.
35. Schultz T.W. The value of the ability to deal with disequilibrium. J. Econ. Lit. 1975, 13(3):827-846.
36. Scott S. Household energy efficiency in Ireland: A replication study of ownership of energy saving items. Energy Econ. 1997, 19:187-208.
37. Simon H.A. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioural science. Am. Econ. Rev. 1959, 49:253-283.
38. Sorrell S. The Rebound Effect: An Assessment of the Evidence for Economy-Wide Energy Savings from Improved Energy Efficiency. A Report Produced by the Sussex Energy Group for the Technology and Policy Assessment Function of the UK Energy Research Centre 2007, UK Energy Research Centre, Sussex.
39. Spiegel Online International Getting around the EU ban: Germans hoarding traditional light bulbs (July 27). http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/getting-around-the-eu-ban-germans-hoarding-traditional-light-bulbs-a-638494.html.
40. van den Bergh J.C.J.M. Energy conservation more effective with rebound policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2011, 48:43-58.
41. VITO Preparatory studies for eco-design requirements of EuPs. Final Report Lot 19: Domestic Lighting 2009, (October 2009).