Assessment of micellar solutions as draw solutions for forward osmosis

Desalination

Volumn 354, Issue , 2014, Pages 97-106

  Gadelha, Gabriela ^a   Nawaz, Muhammad Saqib ^b   Hankins, Nicholas P ^a   Khan, Sher Jamal ^b   Wang, Rong ^c   Tang, Chuyang Y ^c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGY NUST   (Pakistan)

^c NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Draw solution; FO MBR; Forward osmosis; Osmotic pressure; Regeneration; Reverse transport; Surfactant micelles

Indexed keywords

DRAW SOLUTIONS; FO-MBR; FORWARD OSMOSIS; REGENERATION; REVERSE TRANSPORT; SURFACTANT MICELLES;

OSMOSIS;

AQUEOUS SOLUTION; BIOREACTOR; DESALINATION; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; SURFACTANT;

EID: 84907995882     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2014.09.009     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Holloway R.W., Childress A.E., Dennett K.E., Cath T.Y. Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. Water Res. Sep. 2007, 41(17):4005-4014.
2. Mi B., Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of organic fouling of forward osmosis membranes. J. Membr. Sci. Jul. 2008, 320(1-2):292-302.
3. Lay W.C.L., Chong T.H., Tang C.Y., Fane A.G., Zhang J., Liu Y. Fouling propensity of forward osmosis: investigation of the slower flux decline phenomenon. Water Sci. Technol. Feb. 2010, 61(4):927.
4. Xu Y., Peng X., Tang C.Y., Fu Q.S., Nie S. Effect of draw solution concentration and operating conditions on forward osmosis and pressure retarded osmosis performance in a spiral wound module. J. Membr. Sci. Feb. 2010, 348(1-2):298-309.
5. McCutcheon J.R., McGinnis R.L., Elimelech M. A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process. Desalination Apr. 2005, 174(1):1-11.
6. Yip N.Y., Tiraferri A., Phillip W.A., Schiffman J.D., Elimelech M. High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. Environ. Sci. Technol. May 2010, 44(10):3812-3818.
7. Wang R., Shi L., Tang C.Y., Chou S., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characterization of novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membranes. J. Membr. Sci. Jun. 2010, 355(1-2):158-167.
8. Ling M.M., Wang K.Y., Chung T.-S. Highly water-soluble magnetic nanoparticles as novel draw solutes in forward osmosis for water reuse. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. Jun. 2010, 49(12):5869-5876.
9. Ge Q., Su J., Amy G.L., Chung T.-S. Exploration of polyelectrolytes as draw solutes in forward osmosis processes. Water Res. Mar. 2012, 46(4):1318-1326.
10. Li D., Zhang X., Yao J., Simon G.P., Wang H. Stimuli-responsive polymer hydrogels as a new class of draw agent for forward osmosis desalination. Chem. Commun. Jan. 2011, 47(6):1710-1712.
11. Ge Q., Ling M., Chung T.-S. Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. J. Membr. Sci. Sep. 2013, 442:225-237.
12. Ge Q., Chung T.-S. Hydroacid complexes: a new class of draw solutes to promote forward osmosis (FO) processes. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49(76):8471.
13. Nawaz M.S., Gadelha G., Khan S.J., Hankins N. Microbial toxicity effects of reverse transported draw solute in the forward osmosis membrane bioreactor (FO-MBR). J. Membr. Sci. Feb. 2013, 429:323-329.
14. McCutcheon J.R., Elimelech M. Influence of membrane support layer hydrophobicity on water flux in osmotically driven membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. Jun. 2008, 318(1-2):458-466.
15. Hancock N.T., Cath T.Y. Solute coupled diffusion in osmotically driven membrane processes. Environ. Sci. Technol. Sep. 2009, 43(17):6769-6775.
16. Phillip W.A., Yong J.S., Elimelech M. Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. Environ. Sci. Technol. Jul. 2010, 44(13):5170-5176.
17. Myers D. Surfactant Science and Technology 2005, John Wiley & Sons.
18. Furse S. Bubbles, Bubbles, Everywhere, But Not a Drop to Drink 2011, The Lipid Chronicles.
19. Schramm L.L., Stasiuk E.N., Marangoni D.G. 2Surfactants and their applications. Annu. Rep. Sect. C Phys. Chem. Aug. 2003, 99:3-48.
20. Offen H., Turley W. Pressure dependence of the critical micellar temperature. J. Colloid Interface Sci. Apr. 1983, 92(2):575-579.
21. Us'yarov O.G. Critical micellization concentration of ionic surfactants: comparison of theoretical and experimental results. Colloid J. Sep. 2004, 66:612-616.
22. Xiao J., Li W. Study on osmotic pressure of non-ionic and ionic surfactant solutions in the micellar and microemulsion regions. Fluid Phase Equilib. Feb. 2008, 263(2):231-235.
23. Lee K.L., Baker R.W., Lonsdale H.K. Membranes for power generation by pressure-retarded osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 1981, 8(2):141-171.
24. Loeb S., Titelman L., Korngold E., Freiman J. Effect of porous support fabric on osmosis through a Loeb-Sourirajan type asymmetric membrane. J. Membr. Sci. Jul. 1997, 129(2):243-249.
25. Tang C.Y., She Q., Lay W.C.L., Wang R., Fane A.G. Coupled effects of internal concentration polarization and fouling on flux behavior of forward osmosis membranes during humic acid filtration. J. Membr. Sci. May 2010, 354(1-2):123-133.
26. Lee S., Boo C., Elimelech M., Hong S. Comparison of fouling behavior in forward osmosis (FO) and reverse osmosis (RO). J. Membr. Sci. Dec. 2010, 365(1-2):34-39.
27. van Os N.M., Haak J.R., Rupert L.A.M. Physico-Chemical Properties of Selected Anionic, Cationic and Nonionic Surfactants 1993, Elsevier.
28. Chou S., Shi L., Wang R., Tang C.Y., Qiu C., Fane A.G. Characteristics and potential applications of a novel forward osmosis hollow fiber membrane. Desalination Oct. 2010, 261(3):365-372.
29. Shim S.-M., Kim W.-S. A numerical study on the performance prediction of forward osmosis process. J. Mech. Sci. Technol. Apr. 2013, 27(4):1179-1189.