National ecosystems services priorities for planning carbon and water resource management in Colombia

Land Use Policy

Volumn 42, Issue , 2015, Pages 609-618

  Rodriguez N ^a   Armenteras, D ^a   Retana, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

^b CREAF   (Spain)

Author keywords

Carbon storage; Ecosystem services mapping; Planning; Water provision; Watershed

Indexed keywords

CARBON SEQUESTRATION; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; MAPPING; MODELING; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATER PLANNING; WATER RESOURCE; WATERSHED;

AMAZONIA; ANDES; COLOMBIA; PACIFIC OCEAN;

EID: 84907980606     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.013     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Alvarez E., Duque A., Saldarriaga J., Cabrera K., de las Salas G., del Valle I., Lema A., Moreno F., Orrego S., Rodríguez L. Tree above-ground biomass allometries for carbon stocks estimation in the natural forests of Colombia. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2012, 267:297-308.
2. Armenteras D., Rincón A., Ortiz N. Ecological Function Assessment in the Colombian Andean Coffee-growing Region, Sub-global Assessment Report. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005.
3. Armenteras-Pascual D., Retana-Alumbreros J., Molowny-Horas R., Roman-Cuesta R.M., Gonzalez-Alonso F., Morales-Rivas M. Characterising fire spatial pattern interactions with climate and vegetation in Colombia. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 2011, 151:279-289.
4. Armstrong C.W., Foley N.S., Tinch R., Van den Hove S. Services from the deep: steps towards valuation of deep sea goods and services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 2:2-13.
5. Armsworth P.R., Chan K.M., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R., Kremen C., Ricketts T.H., Sanjayan M. Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2007, 21:1383-1384.
6. Bai Y., Zhuang C., Ouyang Z., Zheng H., Jiang B. Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed. Ecol. Complex. 2011, 8:177-183.
7. Balvanera P., Uriarte M., Almeida-Leñero L., Altesor A., Declerck F., Gardner T., Hall J., Lara A., Laterra P., et al. Ecosystem services research in Latin America: the state of the art. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 2:56-70.
8. Banco de la República Informe de la Junta directiva al Congreso de La República 2012.
9. Bastian O. The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24:12-22.
10. The Cost of Policy Inaction. The Case of Not Meeting the 2010 Biodiversity Target 2008, Study for the European Commission, DG Environment, Wageningen. L. Braat, P. ten Brink (Eds.).
11. Braat L.C., de Groot R.S. The ecosystem services agenda: bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:4-15.
12. Bryan B., Grandgirard A., Ward J.R. Quantifying and exploring strategic regional priorities for managing natural capital and ecosystem services given multiple stakeholder perspectives. Ecosystems 2010, 13:539-555.
13. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
14. Cabrera E., Vargas D.M., Galindo G., García M.C. Memoria Técnica: Cuantificación de la tasa de Deforestación para Colombia, Periodo 1990-2000, 2000-2005 2011, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales - IDEAM, Bogotá, DC.
15. Corbera E., Kosoy N., Martinez M. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environ. Change 2007, 17:365-380.
16. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:350-352.
17. Costanza R., Kubiszewski I. The authorship structure of ecosystem services as a transdisciplinary field of scholarship. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:16-25.
18. Daily G.C., Matson P. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9455-9456.
19. de Groot R.S., Wilson M., Boumans R.M. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:393-408.
20. de Groot R.S., Alkemade R., Braat L., Hein L., Willemen L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
21. Egoh B., Rouget M., Reyers B., Knight A.T., Cowling R.M., Van Jaarsveld A.S., Welz A. Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63:714-721.
22. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Richardson D.M., Le Maitre D.C., van Jaarsveld A.S. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2008, 127:135-140.
23. Egoh B., Reyers B., Rouget M., Rouget M., Richardson D.M. Spatial congruence between biodiversity and ecosystem services in South Africa. Biol. Conserv. 2009, 142:553-562.
24. Egoh B., O'Farrell P.J., Charef A., Gurney L.J., Koellner T., Nibam Abi H., Ego M., Willemen L. An African account of ecosystem service provision: use, threats and policy options for sustainable livelihoods. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 2:71-81.
25. Etter A., Sarmiento A., Romero M. Land use changes (1970-2020) and the carbon emissions in the Colombian Llanos. Ecosystem Function in Savannas: Measurement and Modeling at Landscape to Global Scales 2011, 383-402. Taylor & Francis, CRC Press, http://www.crcpress.com/product/isbn/9781439804704. J.M. Hill, N.P. Hanan (Eds.).
26. Farrell P.J.O., Anderson P.M.L. Sustainable multifunctional landscapes: a review to implementation. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2:59-65.
27. Fu B., Wang S., Su C., Forsius M. Linking ecosystem processes and ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 5:1-7.
28. Haines-Young R. Land use and biodiversity relationships. Land Use Policy 2009, 26S:178-186.
29. Haines-Young R., Potschin M., Kienast F. Indicators of ecosystem service potential at European scales: mapping marginal changes and trade-offs. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:39-53.
30. IAvH, IDEAM, IIAP, INVEMAR, SINCHI Informe del Estado del Medio Ambiente y de los Recursos Naturales Renovables 2010 2011, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales - IDEAM, Bogotá, DC.
31. IDEAM, IGAC, IAvH, INVEMAR, SINCHI, IIAP, 2007. Ecosistemas continentales, costeros y marinos de Colombia. Bogotá DC.
32. IDEAM Mapa de la distribución del carbono orgánico en los suelos de Colombia 2001, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, DC.
33. IDEAM Caracterización preliminar del ciclo del carbono a partir de la información existente. Quinto Informe. Proyecto Piloto Nacional de Adaptación al Cambio Climático-INAP. Componente B- Alta Montaña 2009, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, DC.
34. IDEAM Estudio Nacional del Agua 2010, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, DC.
35. IDEAM, MADS, IGAC, IIAP, SINCHI, PNN, 2012. Capa Nacional de Cobertura de la Tierra (periodo 2005-2009): Metodología CORINE Land Cover adaptada para Colombia, escala 1:100.000 - V1.0. Bogotá DC.
36. Koschke L., Fürst C., Frank S., Makeschin F. A multi-criteria approach for an integrated land-cover-based assessment of ecosystem services provision to support landscape planning. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:54-66.
37. Kroll F., Müller F., Haase D., Fohrer N. Rural-urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 2012, 29:521-535.
38. Lavorel S., Grigulis K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2012, 100:128-140.
39. MA Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005, Island Press, Washington, DC.
40. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:10-26.
41. MADS Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral del Recurso Hídrico 2010, Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, Bogotá, DC.
42. MADS Política Nacional para la Gestión Integral de la Biodiversidad y sus Servicios Ecosistémicos (PNGIBSE) 2012, Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo Sostenible, Bogotá, DC.
43. Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Grizzetti B., Drakou E.G., Zulian G., Philipp J., et al. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:31-39.
44. Maes J., Paracchini M.L., Zulian G., Dunbar M.B., Alkemade R., et al. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 155:1-12.
45. Molina A., Govers G., Poesen J., Van Hemelryck H., De Bièvre B., Vanacker V. Environmental factors controlling spatial variation in sediment yield in a central Andean mountain area. Geomorphology 2008, 98:176-186.
46. Molina A., Vanacker V., Balthazar V., Mora D., Govers G. Complex land cover change, water and sediment yield in a degraded Andean environment. J. Hydrol. 2012, 472-473:25-35.
47. Moreno-Sanchez R., Maldonado J.H., Wunder S., Borda-Almanza C. Heterogeneous users and willingness to pay in an ongoing payment for watershed protection initiative in the Colombian Andes. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 75:126-134.
48. Muradian R., Rival L. Between markets and hierarchies: the challenge of governing ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1:93-100.
49. Murgueitio E., Calle Z., Uribe F., Calle A., Solorio B. Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261:1654-1663.
50. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., Ricketts T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:9495-9500.
51. Nedkov S., Burkhard B. Flood regulating ecosystem services - mapping supply and demand, in the Etropole municipality, Bulgaria. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:67-79.
52. Pagiola S., Ramírez E., Gobbi J., Haan C., Ibrahim M., Murgueitio E., Ruíz J.P. Paying for the environmental services of silvopastoral practices in Nicaragua. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64:374-385.
53. Pert P.L., Butler J.R., Brodie J.E., Bruce C., Honzák M., Kroon F.J., Metcalfe D., Mitchell D., Wong G. A catchment-based approach to mapping hydrological ecosystem services using riparian habitat: a case study from the Wet Tropics, Australia. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:378-388.
54. Phillips J.F., Duque A.J., Yepes A.P., Cabrera K.R., García M.C., Navarrete D.A., Álvarez E., Cárdenas D. Estimación de las reservas actuales (2010) de carbono almacenadas en la biomasa aérea en bosques naturales de Colombia. Estratificación, alometría y métodos análiticos 2011, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología, y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, DC.
55. Poveda G., Álvarez D.M., Rueda Ó. Hydro-climatic variability over the Andes of Colombia associated with ENSO: a review of climatic processes and their impact on one of the Earth's most important biodiversity hotspots. Clim. Dyn. 2011, 36:2233-2249.
56. Quintero M., Wunder S., Estrada R.D. Forest ecology and management for services rendered? Modeling hydrology and livelihoods in Andean payments for environmental services schemes. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2009, 258:1871-1880.
57. Restrepo J.D., Kjerfve B., Hermelin M., Restrepo J.C. Factors controlling sediment yield in a major South American drainage basin: the Magdalena River, Colombia. J. Hydrol. 2006, 316:213-232.
58. Rodríguez Eraso N., Armenteras-Pascual D., Retana Alumbreros J. Land use and land cover change in the Colombian Andes: dynamics and future scenarios. J. Land Use Sci. 2012, 1-21. 10.1080/1747423X.2011.650228.
59. Sánchez R., Urrego L., Mayorga R., Vargas G. Metodología para la zonificación de susceptibilidad general del terreno a los movimientos en masa 2010, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología, y Estudios Ambientales, Bogotá, DC.
60. StatSoft Inc. STATISTICA for Windows 2001, StatSoft, Inc, Tulsa, OK.
61. Tallis H., Polasky S., Lozano J.S., Wolny S. Inclusive wealth accounting for regulating ecosystem services. Inclusive Wealth Report 2012. Measuring Progress Towards Sustainability 2012, Cambridge University Press, http://www.unep.org/pdf/IWR_2012.pdf. UNU-IHDP, UNEP (Eds.).
62. TEEB The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity 2010, The Ecological and Economic Foundations, London. P. Kumar (Ed.).
63. UNEP-WCMC Developing Ecosystem Service Indicators: Experiences and Lessons Learned from Sub-global Assessments and other Initiatives. Technical Series No. 58 2011, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montréal.
64. Vanacker V., Molina A., Govers G., Poesen J., Dercon G., Deckers S. River channel response to short-term human-induced change in landscape connectivity in Andean ecosystems. Geomorphology 2005, 72:340-353.
65. Van Hecken G., Bastiaensen J. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not? A political view. Environ. Sci. Policy 2010, 13:785-792.
66. Van Jaarsveld A.S., Biggs R., Scholes R.J., Bohensky E., Reyers B., Lynam T. Measuring conditions and trends in ecosystem services at multiple scales: the Southern African Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (SAfMA) experience. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2005, 360:425-441.
67. Viglizzo E.F., Paruelo J.M., Laterra P., Jobbagy E.G. Ecosystem service evaluation to support land-use policy. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 154:78-84.
68. Wallace K.J. Classification of ecosystem services: problems and solutions. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 1:235-246.
69. Wünscher T., Engel S. International payments for biodiversity services: review and evaluation of conservation targeting approaches. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 152:222-230.
70. Yepes A., Navarrete D.A., Phillips J.F., Duque A.J., Cabrera E., Galindo G., Vargas D., García M., Ordoñez M.F. Estimación de las emisiones de dióxido de carbono generadas por deforestación durante el periodo 2005-2010 2011, Instituto de Hidrología, Meteorología, y Estudios Ambientales-IDEAM, Bogotá, DC.