Structural growth trajectories and rates of change in the first 3 months of infant brain development

JAMA Neurology

Volumn 71, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 1266-1274

  Holland, Dominic ^a   Chang, Linda ^b   Ernst, Thomas M ^b   Curran, Megan ^a   Buchthal, Steven D ^b   Alicata, Daniel ^b   Skranes, Jon ^b,c   Johansen, Heather ^b   Hernandez, Antonette ^b   Yamakawa, Robyn ^d   Kuperman, Joshua M ^a   Dale, Anders M ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE; ARTICLE; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; BRAIN DEVELOPMENT; BRAIN GROWTH; BRAIN LATERAL VENTRICLE; BRAIN SIZE; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CEREBELLUM; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROWTH RATE; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMAN; INFANT; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; NEWBORN; NORMAL HUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREGNANCY; PUTAMEN; SEX DIFFERENCE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; SUBCORTEX; AMYGDALOID NUCLEUS; BRAIN; BRAIN STEM; COHORT ANALYSIS; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; LATERAL BRAIN VENTRICLE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; ORGAN SIZE; THALAMUS;

AMYGDALA; BRAIN; BRAIN STEM; CAUDATE NUCLEUS; CEREBELLUM; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; GLOBUS PALLIDUS; HIPPOCAMPUS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; LATERAL VENTRICLES; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; ORGAN SIZE; PUTAMEN; THALAMUS;

EID: 84907977493     PISSN: 21686149     EISSN: 21686157     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1638     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC, Howard K, Inder TE. Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(7): 685-694.
2. Nossin-Manor R, Card D, Morris D, et al. Quantitative MRI in the very preterm brain: Assessing tissue organization andmyelination using magnetization transfer, diffusion tensor and T1 imaging. Neuroimage. 2013;64: 505-516.
3. Inder TE,Wells SJ, Mogridge NB, Spencer C, Volpe JJ. Defining the nature of the cerebral abnormalities in the premature infant: A qualitative magnetic resonance imaging study. J Pediatr. 2003; 143(2): 171-179.
4. Counsell SJ, Maalouf EF, Fletcher AM, et al. MR imaging assessment ofmyelination in the very preterm brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(5): 872-881.
5. Stiles J, Jernigan TL. The basics of brain development. Neuropsychol Rev. 2010;20(4): 327-348.
6. Gilmore JH, LinW, PrastawaMW, et al. Regional gray matter growth, sexual dimorphism, and cerebral asymmetry in the neonatal brain. J Neurosci. 2007; 27(6): 1255-1260.
7. C. TE Jr. The circumference of the head of newborn infants first measured in 1785. Pediatrics. 1967;39(6): 883.
8. Daymont C, HwangWT, Feudtner C, Rubin D. Head-circumference distribution in a large primary care network differs from CDC and WHO curves. Pediatrics. 2010;126(4): E836-e842.
9. Clinical Growth Charts. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention/National Center for Health Statistics; 2009: Http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts/clinical-charts.htm. Accessed April 14, 2014.
10. Child Growth Standards WHO.Methods and development. Head circumference-for-Age, arm circumference-for-Age, triceps skinfold-for-Age and subscapular skinfold-for-Age: World Health Organization; 2007: Http://www.who.int/childgrowth/publications/technical-report-2/en/. Accessed April 14, 2014.
11. Robertson RL, Robson CD, Zurakowski D, Antiles S, Strauss K, Mulkern RV. CT versus MR in neonatal brain imaging at term. Pediatr Radiol. 2003;33(7): 442-449.
12. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, BerdonW. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR AmJ Roentgenol. 2001;176 (2): 289-296.
13. Sled JG, Nossin-Manor R. Quantitative MRI for studying neonatal brain development. Neuroradiology. 2013;55(suppl 2): 97-104.
14. Williams LA, Gelman N, Picot PA, et al. Neonatal brain: Regional variability of in vivoMR imaging relaxation rates at 3.0 T-initial experience. Radiology. 2005;235(2): 595-603.
15. Pienaar R, Fischl B, Caviness V, Makris N, Grant PE. Amethodology for analyzing curvature in the developing brain from preterm to adult. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2008;18(1): 42-68.
16. van der Knaap MS, vanWezel-Meijler G, Barth PG, Barkhof F, Adèr HJ, Valk J. Normal gyration and sulcation in preterm and term neonates: Appearance on MR images. Radiology. 1996;200 (2): 389-396.
17. Gilmore JH, Shi F,Woolson SL, et al. Longitudinal development of cortical and subcortical gray matter from birth to 2 years. Cereb Cortex. 2012;22(11): 2478-2485.
18. Knickmeyer RC, Gouttard S, Kang C, et al. A structural MRI study of human brain development from birth to 2 years. J Neurosci. 2008;28(47): 12176-12182.
19. Wang L, Shi F, Li G, et al. Segmentation of neonatal brainMR images using patch-driven level sets. Neuroimage. 2014;84: 141-158.
20. Wang L, Shi F, Gao Y, et al. Integration of sparse multi-modality representation and anatomical constraint for isointense infant brainMR image segmentation. Neuroimage. 2014;89: 152-164.
21. Wang L, Shi F, Yap PT, Gilmore JH, LinW, Shen D. 4D multi-modality tissue segmentation of serial infant images. PLoS One. 2012;7(9): E44596.
22. Holland D, Dale AM; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Nonlinear registration of longitudinal images and measurement of change in regions of interest. Med Image Anal. 2011;15(4): 489-497.
23. Holland D, McEvoy LK, Dale AM; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Unbiased comparison of sample size estimates from longitudinal structural measures in ADNI. Hum Brain Mapp. 2012;33(11): 2586-2602.
24. Wood SN. Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additivemixed models. Biometrics. 2006;62(4): 1025-1036.
25. EngleWA; American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Age terminology during the perinatal period. Pediatrics. 2004;114(5): 1362-1364.
26. ShankleWR, RafiiMS, Landing BH, Fallon JH. Approximate doubling of numbers of neurons in postnatal human cerebral cortex and in 35 specific cytoarchitectural areas from birth to 72 months. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 1999;2(3): 244-259.
27. Huttenlocher PR, Dabholkar AS. Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. J Comp Neurol. 1997;387(2): 167-178.
28. Lenroot RK, Giedd JN. Brain development in children and adolescents: Insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2006;30(6): 718-729.
29. Marsh R, Gerber AJ, Peterson BS. Neuroimaging studies of normal brain development and their relevance for understanding childhood neuropsychiatric disorders. J AmAcad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(11): 1233-1251.
30. Achiron R, Yagel S, Rotstein Z, Inbar O, Mashiach S, Lipitz S. Cerebral lateral ventricular asymmetry: Is this a normal ultrasonographic finding in the fetal brain? Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89 (2): 233-237.
31. Ichihashi K, Iino M, Eguchi Y, Uchida A, Honma Y, Momoi M. Difference between left and right lateral ventricular sizes in neonates. Early Human Development. 2002;68(1): 55-64.
32. Dennison M, Whittle S, Yücel M, et al. Mapping subcortical brain maturation during adolescence: Evidence of hemisphere-And sex-specific longitudinal changes. Dev Sci. 2013;16(5): 772-791.
33. Thompson DK,Wood SJ, Doyle LW,Warfield SK, Egan GF, Inder TE.MR-determined hippocampal asymmetry in full-Term and preterm neonates. Hippocampus. 2009;19(2): 118-123.
34. Giedd JN, Vaituzis AC, Hamburger SD, et al. Quantitative MRI of the temporal lobe, amygdala, and hippocampus in normal human development: Ages 4-18 years. J Comp Neurol. 1996;366(2): 223-230.
35. Uematsu A, Matsui M, Tanaka C, et al. Developmental trajectories of amygdala and hippocampus from infancy to early adulthood in healthy individuals. PLoS One. 2012;7(10): E46970.
36. Ratnarajah N, Rifkin-Graboi A, FortierMV, et al. Structural connectivity asymmetry in the neonatal brain. Neuroimage. 2013;75: 187-194.
37. Bishop DV. Cerebral asymmetry and language development: Cause, correlate, or consequence? Science. 2013;340(6138): 1230531.
38. Sun T,Walsh CA. Molecular approaches to brain asymmetry and handedness. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(8): 655-662.
39. Hendren RL, De Backer I, Pandina GJ. Review of neuroimaging studies of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders from the past 10 years. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000;39(7): 815-828.
40. Oertel-Knöchel V, Linden DE. Cerebral asymmetry in schizophrenia. Neuroscientist. 2011;17 (5): 456-467.
41. HerbertMR, Ziegler DA, Deutsch CK, et al. Brain asymmetries in autism and developmental language disorder: A nested whole-brain analysis. Brain. 2005;128(pt 1): 213-226.
42. Shaw P, Greenstein D, Lerch J, et al. Intellectual ability and cortical development in children and adolescents. Nature. 2006;440(7084): 676-679.
43. White N, Roddey C, Shankaranarayanan A, et al. PROMO: Real-Time prospective motion correction in MRI using image-based tracking. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(1): 91-105.
44. Kuperman JM, Brown TT, Ahmadi ME, et al. Prospective motion correction improves diagnostic utility of pediatric MRI scans. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41 (12): 1578-1582.
45. Brown TT, Kuperman JM, ErhartM, et al. Prospective motion correction of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging data in children. Neuroimage. 2010;53(1): 139-145.