Reevaluation of stratospheric ozone trends from SAGE II data using a simultaneous temporal and spatial analysis

Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics

Volumn 14, Issue 24, 2014, Pages 13455-13470

  Damadeo, R P ^a   Zawodny, J M ^a   Thomason, L W ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROSOL; OPTICAL DEPTH; OZONE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SATELLITE DATA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STRATOSPHERE; TREND ANALYSIS;

EID: 84907969874     PISSN: 16807316     EISSN: 16807324     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-13455-2014     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Bodeker, G. E., Hassler, B., Young, P. J., and Portmann, R. W.: A vertically resolved, global, gap-free ozone database for assessing or constraining global climate model simulations, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 5, 31-43, doi:10.5194/essd-5-31-2013, 2013.
2. Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Randel, W. J., Zawodny, J. M., Kyrölä, E., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., and Roth, C. Z.: Trends in stratospheric ozone derived from merged SAGE II and Odin-OSIRIS satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6983-6994, doi:10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014, 2014.
3. Cochrane, D. and Orcutt, G.: Application of least squares regression to relationships containing auto-correlated error terms, J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 44, 32-61, doi:10.1080/01621459.1949.10483290, 1949.
4. Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Thomason, L. W., and Iyer, N.: SAGE version 7.0 algorithm: application to SAGE II, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3539-3561, doi:10.5194/amt-6-3539-2013, 2013.
5. Kutner, M. H., Nachtsheim, C. J., Neter, J., and Li, W.: Applied Linear Statistical Models, McGraw-Hill/Irwin, 5 edn., iSBN 0-07-238688-6, 2005.
6. Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Sofieva, V., Tamminen, J., Päivärinta, S.-M., Tukiainen, S., Zawodny, J., and Thomason, L.: Combined SAGE II-GOMOS ozone profile data set for 1984-2011 and trend analysis of the vertical distribution of ozone, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10645-10658, doi:10.5194/acp-13-10645-2013, 2013.
7. Markwardt, C. B.: Non-Linear Least Squares Fitting in IDL with MPFIT, in: Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVIII, vol. 411, 251-254, http://purl.com/net/mpfit, 2009.
8. Muller, J. W.: Possible Advantages of a Robust Evaluation of Comparisons, J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stan., 105, 551-555, https://archive. org/details/jresv105n4p551, 2000.
9. Newman, P. A., Daniel, J. S., Waugh, D. W., and Nash, E. R.: A new formulation of equivalent effective stratospheric chlorine (EESC), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4537-4552, doi:10.5194/acp-7-4537-2007, 2007.
10. Prais, S. J. and Winsten, C. B.: Trend estimators and serial correlation, Chicago: Cowles Commission, http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/ P/ccdp/st/s-0383.pdf, 1954.
11. Randel, W. J. and Wu, F.: A stratospheric ozone profile data set for 1979-2005: Variability, trends, and comparisons with column ozone data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, D06313, doi:10.1029/2006JD007339, 2007.
12. Remsberg, E. and Lingenfelser, G.: Analysis of SAGE II ozone of the middle and upper stratosphere for its response to a decadal-scale forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11779-11790, doi:10.5194/acp-10-11779-2010, 2010.
13. Remsberg, E. E.: Decadal-scale responses in middle and upper stratospheric ozone from SAGE II version 7 data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1039-1053, doi:10.5194/acp-14-1039-2014, 2014.
14. Savin, N. E. and White, K. J.: Testing for autocorrelation with missing observations, Econometrica, 46, 59-67, 1978.
15. Solomon, S., Portmann, R. W., Garcia, R. R., Thomason, L. W., Poole, L. R., and McCormick, M. P.: The role of aerosol variations in anthropogenic ozone depletion at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 6713-6727, doi:10.1029/95JD03353, 1996.
16. SPARC: Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP), SPARC Report No. 4, WCRP-124, WMO/TD-No. 1295, http://www.sparc-climate.org/publications/sparc-reports/ sparc-report-no4/, 2006.
17. SPARC: Chemistry-Climate Model Validation, SPARC Report No. 5, WCRP-30, WMO/TD-No. 40, http://www.sparc-climate.org/ publications/sparc-reports/sparc-report-no5/, 2010.
18. Stolarski, R., Douglass, A., Steenrod, S., and Pawson, S.: Trends in Stratospheric Ozone: Lessons Learned from a 3D Chemical Transport Model, J. Atmos. Sci., 63, 1028-1041, doi:10.1175/JAS3650.1, 2006.
19. Thomas, M. A., Giorgetta, M. A., Timmreck, C., Graf, H.-F., and Stenchikov, G.: Simulation of the climate impact of Mt. Pinatubo eruption using ECHAM5 - Part 2: Sensitivity to the phase of the QBO and ENSO, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 3001-3009, doi:10.5194/acp-9-3001-2009, 2009.
20. Tung, K. K. and Yang, H.: Global QBO in Circulation and Ozone. Part I: Reexamination of Observational Evidence, J. Atmos. Sci., 51, 2699-2707, 1994.
21. Wang, H. J., Cunnold, D. M., Thomason, L. W., Zawodny, J. M., and Bodeker, G. E.: Assessment of SAGE version 6.1 ozone data quality, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, ACH 8-1-ACH 8-18, doi:10.1029/2002JD002418, 2002.
22. Waugh, D. and Hall, T.: Age of stratospheric air: Theory, observations, and models, Rev. Geophys., 40, 1-1-1-26, doi:10.1029/2000RG000101, 2002.
23. WMO: Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel 1988, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project-Report No. 18, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, http: //www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/ozone/1988/report.html, 1988.
24. WMO: Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2010, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project-Report No. 52, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, http://www. esrl.noaa.gov/csd/assessments/ozone/2010/report.html, 2011.