The Need to Disentangle Key Concepts from Ecosystem-Approach Jargon

Conservation Biology

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2014, Pages 1215-1224

  Waylen, K A ^a   Hastings, E J ^a   Banks, E A ^a   Holstead, K L ^a   Irvine, R J ^a   Blackstock, K L ^a  

^a SCOTTISH CROP RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Conservation paradigms; Ecosystem management; Ecosystem services; Governance; Politics and policy; Society and conservation

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; NOMENCLATURE;

BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 84907952841     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cobi.12331     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Adams, W. M. 2009. Editorial introduction to volume I: the idea of conservation. Pages 1-16 in W. M. Adams, editor. Conservation. Volume I. Earthscan, London.
2. Armitage, D. 2005. Adaptive capacity and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management 35:703-715.
3. Balmford, A., B. Fisher, R. E. Green, R. Naidoo, B. Strassburg, R. K. Turner, and A. S. L. Rodrigues 2011. Bringing ecosystem services into the real world: an operational framework for assessing the economic consequences of losing wild nature. Environmental and Resource Economics 48:161-175.
4. Barak, M. E. M. 2000. The inclusive workplace: an ecosystems approach to diversity management. Social Work 45:339-353.
5. Beaumont, N. J., et al. 2007. Identification, definition and quantification of goods and services provided by marine biodiversity: implications for the ecosystem approach. Marine Pollution Bulletin 54:253-265.
6. Blackstock, K. L., and C. Richards 2007. Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study. Water Policy 9:493-512.
7. Blackstock, K. L., K. A. Waylen, J. Dunglinson, and K. M. Marshall 2012. Linking process to outcomes - internal and external criteria for a stakeholder involvement in river basin management planning. Ecological Economics 77:113-122.
8. Cardinale, B. J., et al. 2012. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59-67.
9. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2000. Decision V/6 Ecosystem Approach. Decision adopted by the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its fifth meeting, 15-26 May 2000, Nairobi, Kenya. Available from http://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/default.shtml?id=7148 (accessed March 2014).
10. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2004. Decision VII/11 Ecosystem Approach. Decision adopted by the Conference of Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its seventh meeting, 9-20 and 27 February 2004, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Available from http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-07/cop-07-dec-11-en.doc (accessed March 2014).
11. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2006. Decision VIII/9 Implications of the findings of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its eighth meeting, 20-31 March 2006, Curitiba, Brazil. Available from http://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/COP-08/cop-08-dec-09-en.doc (accessed March 2014).
12. CBD SBSTTA (Convention on Biological Diversity, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice). 2000. Recommendation V/10 Ecosystem approach: further conceptual elaboration. Recommendations adopted by the SBSTTA fifth meeting, 31 January-4 February 2000, Montreal. Available from https://www.cbd.int/doc/recommendations/sbstta-05/full/sbstta-05-rec-en.pdf (accessed March 2014).
13. CBD SBSTTA (Convention on Biological Diversity, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice). 2003. Conceptual frameworks and case-based knowledge management for the Ecosystem Approach. Information document UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/9/INF/35 prepared for the SBSTTA ninth meeting, 10-14 November 2003, Montreal. Available from https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-09/information/sbstta-09-inf-35-en.pdf (accessed March 2014).
14. CBD SBSTTA (Convention on Biological Diversity, Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice). 2007. In depth review of the application of the ecosystem approach. Offical document UNEP/CBD/SBSTTA/12/2 prepared for the SBSTTA twelfth meeting, 2-6 July 2007, UNESCO, Paris. Available from https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-12/official/sbstta-12-02-en.pdf (accessed March 2014).
15. CBD WGRI (Convention on Biological Diversity, Working Group on Review of Implementation). 2005. Report of the first meeting of the ad hoc open-ended working group on review of implementation of the convention. Official document UNEP/CBD/COP/8/4 prepared for the eighth meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 20-31 March 2006, Curitiba, Brazil. Available from https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-08/official/cop-08-04-en.doc (accesssed March 2014).
16. Christensen, N. L., et al. 1996. The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecological Applications 6:665-691.
17. Corrales, O., F. Carrera, and J. J. Campos 2005. El bosque modelo: una plataforma territorial para la aplicación del enfoque ecosistémico. Recursos Naturales y Ambiente 45:6-12.
18. Costanza, R., et al. 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253-260.
19. de Groot, R. S., R. Alkemade, L. Braat, L. Hein, and L Willemen 2010. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity 7:260-272.
20. Decker, D. J., C. C. Krueger, R. A. Baer, B. A. Knuth, and M. E. Richmond 1996. From clients to stakeholders: a philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1:70-82.
21. Dressler, W., B. Buscher, M. Schoon, D. Brockington, T. Hayes, C. A. Kull, J. McCarthy, and K. Shrestha 2010. From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental Conservation 37:5-15.
22. Fee, E., K. Gerber, J. Rust, K. Haggenmueller, H. Korn, and P. Ibisch 2009. Stuck in the clouds: bringing the CBD's Ecosystem Approach for conservation management down to Earth in Canada and Germany. Journal for Nature Conservation 17:212-227.
23. Fish, R. D. 2011. Environmental decision making and an ecosystems approach. Progress in Physical Geography 35:671-680.
24. Greer, D. 1996. Water management on a watershed basis - Implementing an ecosystem approach - the Ontario experience. Pages 125-138 in C. E. Delisle and M. A. Bouchard, editors. Rational and sustainable development of water resources, Proceedings of the 49th Annual Conference of the Association-Canadienne-des-Resources-Hydriques on Rational and Sustainable Development of Water Resources. Canadian Water Resources Association, Cambridge, Ontario.
25. Grumbine, R. E. 1994. What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology 8:27-38.
26. Hassan, R. M., R. Scholes, and N. Ash, editors. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the condition and trends working group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Available from http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.766.aspx.pdf (accessed March 2014).
27. Hill, S. B., C. Vincent, and G. Chouinard 1999. Evolving ecosystems approaches to fruit insect pest management. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 73:107-110.
28. Hughes, R., and F. Flintan 2001. Integrating conservation and development experience: a review and bibliography of the ICDP Literature. IIED, London.
29. Janssen, W., and P. Goldsworthy 1996. Multidisciplinary research for natural resource management: conceptual and practical implications. Agricultural Systems 51:259-279.
30. Johnson, B. L. 1999. Introduction to the special feature: adaptive management - scientifically sound, socially challenged? Ecology and Society 3: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol3/iss1/art10.
31. Jones, M. L., and W. W. Taylor 1999. Challenges to the implementation of the ecosystem approach in the Great Lakes basin. Aquatic Ecosystem Health & Management 2:249-254.
32. Kapos, V., A. Balmford, R. Aveling, P. Bubb, P. Carey, A. Entwistle, J. Hopkins, T. Mulliken, R. Safford, A. Stattersfield, M. Walpole, and A. Manica 2008. Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conservation Letters. 1:155-164.
33. Kleiman, D. G., R. P. Reading, B. J. Miller, T. W. Clark, J. M. Scott, J. Robinson, R. L. Wallace, R. J. Cabin, and F. Felleman 2000. Improving the evaluation of conservation programs. Conservation Biology 14:356-365.
34. Maltby, E. 2000. Ecosystem Approach: from principle to practice. Ecosystem Service and Sustainable Watershed Management in North China International Conference, Beijing, P.R. China, August 23-25, 2000. Available from http://www.biotechnology.uni-koeln.de/inco2-dev/common/contribs/18_maltb.pdf (accessed March 2014).
35. Merrey, D., P. Drechsel, F. de Vries, and H. Sally 2005. Integrating "livelihoods" into integrated water resources management: taking the integration paradigm to its logical next step for developing countries. Regional Environmental Change 5:197-204.
36. Mistry, J., A. Berardi, M. Simpson, O. Davis, and L. Haynes 2010. Using a systems viability approach to evaluate integrated conservation and development projects: assessing the impact of the North Rupununi Adaptive Management Process, Guyana. Geographical Journal 176: 241-252.
37. Norgaard, R. B. 2010. Ecosystem services: from eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics 69:1219-1227.
38. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431.
39. Rice, J. 2011. Managing fisheries well: delivering the promises of an ecosystem approach. Fish and Fisheries 12:209-231.
40. Rouquette, J. R., H. Posthumus, D. J. G. Gowing, G. Tucker, Q. L. Dawson, T. M. Hess, and J. Morris 2009. Valuing nature-conservation interests on agricultural floodplains. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:289-296.
41. Salles, J.-M. 2011. Valuing biodiversity and ecosystem services: why put economic values on nature? Comptes Rendus Biologies 334:469-482.
42. Shackleton, C. M., T. J. Willis, K. Brown, and N. V. C. Polunin 2010. Reflecting on the next generation of models for community-based natural resources management. Environmental Conservation 37:1-4.
43. Slocombe, D. S. 1993. Implementing Ecosystem-Based Management. BioScience 43:612-622.
44. Smith, J., A. Mapendembe, A. Vega, M. Hernandez Morcillo, M. Walpole, and P. Herkenrath 2010. Linking the thematic programmes of work of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) to poverty reduction and development. Biodiversity for development: new approaches for national biodiversity strategies. CBD Secretariat, Montreal. Available from http://www.cbd.int/development/doc/cbd-pow-poverty-en.pdf (accessed March 2014).
45. Smith, R. D., and E. Maltby 2001. Using the ecosystem approach to implement the CBD: a global synthesis report drawing lessons from three regional pathfinder workshops. Royal Holloway Institute for Environmental Research, Surrey, United Kingdom. Available from https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/esa/ecosys-01/information/ecosys-01-inf-02-en.pdf (accessed March 2014).
46. Szaro, R. C., W. T. Sexton, and C. R. Malone 1998. The emergence of ecosystem management as a tool for meeting people's needs and sustaining ecosystems. Landscape and Urban Planning 40:1-7.
47. Tallis, H., P. Kareiva, M. Marvier, and A. Chang 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105:9457-9464.
48. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2010. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. UNEP, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://www.teebweb.org/wp-content/uploads/Study and Reports/Reports/Synthesis report/TEEB Synthesis Report 2010.pdf (accessed March 2014).
49. Tollefson, J., and N. Gilbert 2012. Earth summit: Rio report card. Nature 486:20-23.
50. Toman, M. 1998. Special section: forum on valuation of ecosystem services: why not to calculate the value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics 25:57-60.
51. Turner, R., and G. Daily 2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics 39:25-35.
52. UK NEA (UK National Ecosystem Assessment). 2011. The UK National Ecosystem Assessment. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, United Kingdom. Available from http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ (accessed March 2014).
53. Vira, B., and W. M. Adams 2009. Ecosystem services and conservation strategy: beware the silver bullet. Conservation Letters 2:158-162.
54. Waters, R. D., J. Lusardi, and S. Clarke 2012. Delivering the ecosystem approach on the ground - an evaluation of the upland ecosystem service pilots. Natural England Research Reports, Number 046. Natural England, York.
55. Western, D., S. C. Strum, and M. R. Wright, editors. 1994. Natural connections: perspectives in community-based conservation. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
56. Yaffee, S. L. 1999. Three faces of ecosystem management. Conservation Biology 13:713-725.