Impact of the transparent reporting of evaluations with nonrandomized designs reporting guideline: Ten years on

American Journal of Public Health

Volumn 104, Issue 11, 2014, Pages e110-e117

  Fuller, Thomas ^a   Peters, Jaime ^a   Pearson, Mark ^a   Anderson, Rob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; EDITORIAL POLICIES; GUIDELINE ADHERENCE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 84907858516     PISSN: 00900036     EISSN: 15410048     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302195     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Armstrong R, Waters E, Moore L, et al. Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT. J Public Health (Oxf). 2008;30(1):103-109.
2. Waters E, Priest N, Armstrong R, et al. The role of a prospective public health intervention study register in building public health evidence: proposal for content and use. J Public Health (Oxf). 2007;29 (3):322-327.
3. Kelly MP, Stewart E, Morgan A, et al. A conceptual framework for public health: NICE' s emerging approach. Public Health. 2009;123(1):e14-e20.
4. Medical Research Council. Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions. London, England: Medical Research Council; 2008.
5. Smith RD, Petticrew M. Public health evaluation in the twenty-first century: time to see the wood as well as the trees. J Public Health (Oxf). 2010;32(1):2-7.
6. Victora CG, Habicht J-P, Bryce J. Evidence-based public health: moving beyond randomized trials. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(3):400-405.
7. Pearson M, Peters J. Outcome reporting bias in evaluations of public health interventions: evidence of impact and the potential role of a study register. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012;66(4):286-289.
8. Glasziou P, Altman DG, Bossuyt P, et al. Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):267-276.
9. Moher D, Weeks L, Ocampo M, et al. Describing reporting guidelines for health research: a systematic review. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(7):718-742.
10. Jackson NW, Howes FS, Gupta S, Doyle JL, Waters E. Interventions implemented through sporting organisations for increasing participation in sport. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005;(2):CD004812.
11. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, TREND Group. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. Am J Public Health. 2004;94 (3):361-366.
12. Dzewaltowski DA, Estabrooks PA, Klesges LM, Glasgow RE. TREND: an important step, but not enough. Am J Public Health. 2004;94(9):1474.
13. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;340:c332.
14. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman D. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. JAMA. 2001;285(15):1987-1991.
15. CONSORT Group. Impact of and adherence to CONSORT Statement. CONSORT Group Web site. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/aboutconsort/impact-of-consort. Accessed August 14, 2014.
16. Zwarenstein M, Treweek S, Gagnier JJ, et al. Improving the reporting of pragmatic trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. BMJ. 2008;337:a2390.
17. Boutron I, Moher D, Altman DG, Schulz KF, Ravaud P. Extending the CONSORT statement to randomized trials of nonpharmacologic treatment: explanation and elaboration. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(4):295-309.
18. Grant SP, Mayo-Wilson E, Melendez-Torres GJ, Montgomery P. Reporting quality of social and psychological intervention trials: a systematic review of reporting guidelines and trial publications. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e65442.
19. Montgomery P, Grant S, Hopewell S, et al. Protocol for CONSORT-SPI: an extension for social and psychological interventions. Implement Sci. 2013;8:99.
20. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2006;185(5):263-267.
21. Prady SL, Richmond SJ, Morton VM, MacPherson H. A systematic evaluation of the impact of STRICTA and CONSORT recommendations on quality of reporting for acupuncture trials. PLoS ONE. 2008;3(2):e1577.
22. Turner L, Moher D, Shamseer L, et al. The influence of CONSORT on the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials: an updated review. Trials. 2011;12 (suppl 1):A47.
23. Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, Milne R, Perera R, Moher D, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
24. Fuller T, Pearson M, Peters JL, Anderson R. Evaluating the impact and use of Transparent Reporting of Evaluations with Non-randomised Designs (TREND) reporting guidelines. BMJ Open. 2012;2(6):e002073.
25. Kulkarni AV, Aziz B, Shams I, Busse JW. Comparisons of citations in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for articles published in general medical journals. JAMA. 2009;302(10):1092-1096.
26. Li J, Burnham JF, Lemley T, Britton RM. Citation analysis: comparison of Web of Science®, Scopus™, SciFinder®, and Google Scholar. J Electron Resour Med Libr. 2010;7(3):196-217.
27. Giustini D, Boulos MNK. Google Scholar is not enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Online J Public Health Inform. 2013;5(2):214.
28. Kunath F, Grobe HR, Rucker G, et al. Do journals publishing in the fi eld of urology endorse reporting guidelines? A survey of author instructions. Urol Int. 2012;88(1):54-59.
29. Dong P, Loh M, Mondry A. The "impact factor" revisited. Biomed Digit Libr. 2005;2:7.
30. Thomas BH, Ciliska D, Dobbins M, Micucci S. A process for systematically reviewing the literature: providing the research evidence for public health nursing interventions. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2004;1 (3):176-184.
31. NICE. Methods for Development of NICE Public Health Guidance. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009.
32. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2012.
33. Lyles CM, Kay LS, Crepaz N, et al. Best-evidence interventions: findings from a systematic review of HIV behavioral interventions for US populations at high risk, 2000-2004. Am J Public Health. 2007;97 (1):133-143.
34. Larson EL, Cortazal M. Publication guidelines need widespread adoption. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65(3):239-246.
35. da Costa BR, Cevallos M, Altman DG, Rutjes AWS, Egger M. Uses and misuses of the STROBE statement: bibliographic study. BMJ Open. 2011;1(1): e000048.
36. Higgins JPT, Ramsay C, Reeves BC, et al. Issues relating to study design and risk of bias when including non-randomized studies in systematic reviews on the effects of interventions. Res Synth Methods. 2013;4(1):12-25.
37. Wager E, Fiack S, Graf C, Robinson A, Rowlands I. Science journal editors' views on publication ethics: results of an international survey. J Med Ethics. 2009;35 (6):348-353.
38. Li X-Q, Tao K-m, Zhou Q-h, et al. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high-impact medical journals in China: a survey of instructions for authors and published papers. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30683.
39. Mills E, Wu P, Gagnier J, Heels-Ansdell D, Montori VM. An analysis of general medical and specialist journals that endorse CONSORT found that reporting was not enforced consistently. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(7):662-667.
40. Altman DG. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact medical journals: survey of instructions for authors. BMJ. 2005;330(7499):1056-1057.
41. Hopewell S, Altman D, Moher D, Schulz K. Endorsement of the CONSORT statement by high impact factor medical journals: a survey of journal editors and journal 'instructions to authors'. Trials. 2008;9(1):20-26.
42. Stevens A, Shamseer L, Weinstein E, Yazdi F, Turner L, Thielman J, et al. Relation of completeness of reporting of health research to journals' endorsement of reporting guidelines: systematic review. BMJ. 2014;348:g3804.
43. Shamseer L. Lessons Learned From the Development of a Strategy to Improve the Uptake of CONSORT. Ottawa, ON, Canada: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; 2013.
44. Simera I, Altman DG, Moher D, Schulz KF, Hoey J. Guidelines for reporting health research: the EQUATOR network's survey of guideline authors. PLoS Med. 2008; 5(6):e139.
45. Delaney M, Meyer E, Cserti-Gazdewich C, et al. A systematic assessment of the quality of reporting for platelet transfusion studies. Transfusion. 2010;50(10):2135-2144.
46. Bastuji-Garin S, Sbidian E, Gaudy-Marqueste C, et al. Impact of STROBE statement publication on quality of observational study reporting: interrupted time series versus before-after analysis. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(8):e64733.
47. Parsons NR, Hiskens R, Price CL, Achten J, Costa ML. A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(9):1154-1159.
48. CONSORT Group. CONSORT Downloads. CONSORT Website. Available at: http://www.consort-statement.org/consort-2010. Accessed August 14, 2014.
49. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46(1):81-95.