Follow-up of aortic stent grafts: Comparison of the volumetric analysis of the aneurysm sac by ultrasound and CT

Annals of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 7, 2014, Pages 1618-1628

  Arsicot, Matthieu ^a   Lathelize, Hubert ^a   Martinez, Robert ^a   Marchand, Etienne ^a   Picquet, Jean ^b   Enon, Bernard ^b  

^a SERVICE DE DERMATOLOGIE   (France)

^b ANGERS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM SAC; AGED; AORTA GRAFT; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; ULTRASOUND SCANNER; VOLUMETRY; AORTIC ANEURYSM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK FACTOR; STENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84907814726     PISSN: 08905096     EISSN: 16155947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2014.03.034     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Haute Autorité de Santé. Evaluation des endoprothèses aortiques abdominales utilisées pour le traitement des anévrysmes de l'aorte abdominale sous-rénale. 7 juillet 2009. [en ligne]. Disponible sur: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/c-874335/fr/.
2. Haute Autorité de Santé. Evaluation médico-économique des endoprothèses aortiques abdominales. Janvier 2012. [en ligne]. Disponible sur: http://www.has-sante.fr/portail/jcms/r-1499210/fr/.
3. EVAR trial participants Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR Trial 1): randomised controlled trial Lancet 365 2005 2179 2186
4. H. Menzel, H. Schibilla, and D. Teunen European guidelines on quality criteria for computed tomography. Luxembourg 2000 European Commission Luxembourg publication no EUR 16262 EN
5. P. Nambi, R. Sengupta, and Z. Krajcer Non-contrast computed tomography is comparable to contrast-enhanced computed tomography for aortic volume analysis after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41 2011 460 466
6. V. Cantisani, P. Ricci, and H. Grazhdani Prospective comparative analysis of colour-Doppler ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance in detecting endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 41 2011 186 192
7. T.A. Mirza, A. Karthikesalingam, and D. Jackson Duplex ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomography for the detection of endoleak after EVAR: systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 39 2010 418 428
8. G. Sarlon, F. Lapierre, and E. Sarlon Surveillance des endoprothèses aortiques abdominales: intérêt de l'échographie-doppler standard et avec contraste J Mal Vasc 34 2009 34 43
9. F. Becker, and J.M. Baud Dépistage des anévrysmes de l'aorte abdominale et surveillance des petits anévrysmes de l'aorte abdominale: argumentaire et recommandations de la société française de médecine vasculaire J Mal Vasc 31 2006 260 276
10. N.S. Cayne, F.J. Veith, and E.C. Lipsitz Variability of maximal aortic aneurysm diameter measurements on CT scan: significance and methods to minimize J Vasc Surg 39 2004 811 815
11. J.W. Van Keulen, J. Van Prehn, and M. Prokop Potential value of aneurysm sac volume measurements in addition to diameter measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair J Endovasc Ther 16 2009 506 513
12. J.D. Hahne, C. Arndt, and J. Herrmann Follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular aortic repair: comparison of volumetric and diametric measurement Eur J Radiol 81 2012 1187 1191
13. J.M. Bland, and D.G. Altman Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1986 307 310
14. R. Singh-Ranger, C. McArthur, and M. Della Corte The abdominal aortic aneurysm sac after endoluminal exclusion: a medium-term morphologic follow-up based on volumetric technology J Vasc Surg 31 2000 490 500
15. M. Wayne Causey, A. Jayaraj, and D.F. Leotta Three-dimensional ultrasonography measurements after endovascular aneurysm repair Ann Vasc Surg 27 2012 146 153
16. K. Bredahl, A. Long, and M. Taudorf Volume estimation of aortic sac after EVAR using 3-D ultrasound-A novel, accurate and promising technique Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 45 2013 450 455
17. J.A. Ten Bosch, E.V. Rouwet, and C. Peters Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus computed tomographic angiography for surveillance of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair J Vasc Interv Radiol 21 2010 638 643
18. S.M. Han, K. Patel, and V.L. Rowe Ultrasound-determined diameter measurements are more accurate than axial computed tomography after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair J Vasc Surg 51 2010 1381 1387
19. S.M. Santilli, F.N. Littooy, and R.A. Cambria Expansion rates and outcomes for the 3.0-cm to the 3.9-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm J Vasc Surg 35 2002 666 671
20. R.J. McCarthy, E. Shaw, and M.R. Whyman Recommendations for screening intervals for small aortic aneurysms Br J Surg 90 2003 821 826
21. J.R. Boyle Long-term outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair Br J Surg 96 2009 447 448
22. G. Deklunder, I. Sediri, and T. Donati Intérêt de l'échographie de contraste dans la surveillance des endoprothèses aortiques J Radiol 90 2009 141 147