Kræftpatienters og lægers erfaringer med kontrolforløb er forskellige

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 176, Issue 20, 2014, Pages 1855-1858

  Dahl, Lotte ^a   Væggemose, Ulla ^b   Blaakaer, Jan ^a   Petersen, Lone Kjeld ^a   Wittrup, Inge ^b  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b CFK Folkesundhed og Kvalitetsudvikling ^*  (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; NURSE; NURSE PATIENT RELATIONSHIP; PHYSICIAN; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECURRENT DISEASE; SOCIOECONOMICS; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE-PATIENT RELATIONS; NURSES; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RECURRENCE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84907806062     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. NORDCAN, Association of the Nordic Cancer Registries. Kræftstatistik: Nøgletal og figurer. Danmark-Alle kræftformer undtagen anden hud. 2013. www-dep. iarc.fr/NORDCAN/DK/StatsFact.asp?cancer=410&country=208 (13. sep 2013).
2. Lajer H, Jensen MB, Kilsmark J et al. The value of gynecologic cancer follow-up: evidence-based ignorance? Int J Gynecol Cancer 2010;20:1307-20.
3. Elit L, Fyles AW, Devries MC et al. Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Followup for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2009;114:528-35.
4. Lanceley A, Fiander A, McCormack M et al. Follow-up protocols for women with cervical cancer after primary treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;11: CD008767.
5. Rustin GJ, van der Burg ME, Griffin CL et al. Early versus delayed treatment of relapsed ovarian cancer (MRC OV05/EORTC 55955): a randomised trial. Lancet 2010;376:1155-63.
6. Thorne S. Interpretive descprition. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press, Inc., 2008.
7. Kew FM, Galaal K, Manderville H. Patients' views of follow-up after treatment for gynaecological cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol 2009;29:135-42.
8. National Cancer Institute, at The National Institutes of Health. Adjustment to Cancer: Anxiety and Distress (PDQ). 2013. www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/ supportivecare/adjustment/Patient/page1/AllPages (21. maj 2014).
9. Kræftens Bekæmpelse. Kræftramtes behov og oplevelser gennem behandling og i efterforløbet. 2013. www.cancer.dk/NR/rdonlyres/BED6DF2C-312F-42F2- 9286-0FCA639FDC07/0/Barometerrapport2013.pdf (21. maj 2014).
10. Kræftens Bekæmpelse. Opfølgningsforløb-om livet efter endt kræftbehandling. 2013. http://webshop.cancer.dk/pjecer-og-information/hvis-du-har-faetkraeft- eller-er-paroerende/stoette-og-radgivning/43/opfoelgningsforloeb-omlivet- efter-endt-kraeftbehandling (21. maj 2014).