Modelling agronomic properties of Technosols constructed with urban wastes

Waste Management

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2014, Pages 2155-2162

  Rokia, S ^a,b,c   Sere G ^a,b   Schwartz, C ^a,b   Deeb, M ^a,b   Fournier, F ^a   Nehls, T ^d   Damas, O ^e   Vidal Beaudet, L ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LORRAINE   (France)

^b LABORATOIRE SOLS ET ENVIRONNEMENT   (France)

^c Institut National d'Horticulture et de Paysage   (France)

^d TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^e Plante and Cité   (France)

Author keywords

Agronomic properties; Constructed Technosol; Dose response curves; Pedological engineering; Urban vegetation; Wastes formulation

Indexed keywords

AGRONOMY; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; MIXTURES; RECYCLING; SOILS;

AGRONOMIC PROPERTIES; CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITIES; CONSTRUCTED TECHNOSOL; DOSE-RESPONSE CURVES; MULTI-LINEAR REGRESSION; URBAN AND SUBURBAN AREAS; URBAN VEGETATION; WATER RETENTION CAPACITY;

WASTES;

CARBON; PHOSPHORUS; WATER; SOIL;

CATION EXCHANGE CAPACITY; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP; PH; PHOSPHORUS; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; RECYCLING; SOIL CLASSIFICATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TYPE; URBAN POLLUTION; WASTE DISPOSAL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

AGRONOMIC TRAIT; ARTICLE; BULK DENSITY; CATION EXCHANGE; FEASIBILITY STUDY; PH MEASUREMENT; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; RECYCLING; SOIL ACIDITY; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL FERTILITY; SOIL MANAGEMENT; SOIL PROPERTY; TECHNOSOL; URBAN AREA; WASTE MANAGEMENT; WATER RETENTION; CHEMISTRY; CITY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; SOIL; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CITIES; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; RECYCLING; SOIL; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 84907711899     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: 18792456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. ADEME, Déchets, Chiffres-clés, Edition 2012, ADEME éditions.
2. Arrouays D., Jolivet C., Boulonne L., Bodineau G., Grolleau E. A new initiative in France: a multi-scale multi-institutional soil quality monitoring network. Comptes rendus de l'Academie d'Agriculture de France 2002, 88(5):93-103.
3. Bassuk N., Grabovsky J., Trowbridge P. Using CU-Structural Soil in the Urban Environment 2005, Urban Horticultural Inst, Cornell U.
4. Craul P.J. Urban Soils: Applications and Practices 1999, John Wiley & Sons.
5. Fierro A., Angers D.A., Beauchamp C.J. Restoration of ecosystem function in an abandoned sandpit: plant and soil responses to paper de-inking sludge. J. Appl. Ecol. 1999, 36(2):244-253.
6. Grabosky J., Bassuk N., Trowbridge P. Structural soils: a new medium to allow urban trees to grow in pavement. Landscape architecture technical information series (LATIS). Am. Soc. Landscape Architects 2002, 636:20001-23736.
7. Grosbellet C., Vidal-Beaudet L., Caubel V., Charpentier S. Improvement of soil structure formation by degradation of coarse organic matter. Geoderma 2011, 162(1-2):27-38.
8. Guyon, E., Troadec, J-P., 1994. Du sac de billes au tas de sable. Odile Jacob Editions.
9. Huot H., Simmonot M.O., Marion P., Yvon J., De Donato P., Morel J.L. Characteristics and potential pedogenetic processes of a technosol developing on iron industry deposits. J. Soils Sediments 2012, 1-14.
10. Jim C. Urban soil characteristics and limitations for landscape planting in Hong Kong. Landscape Urban Plann. 1998, 10(4):235-249.
11. Jolivet C., Boulonne L., Ratié C. Manuel du Réseau de Mesures de la Qualité des Sols 2006, Unité InfoSol, INRA Orléans, France.
12. Khakhar D.V. Rheology and mixing of granular materials. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2011, 296(3-4):278-289.
13. Lorenz K., Lal R. Biogeochemical C and N cycles in urban soils. Environ. Int. 2009, 35(1):1-8.
14. Marshall R.E., Farahbakhsh K. Systems approaches to integrated solid waste management in developing countries. Waste Manage. 2013, 33(4):988-1003.
15. Morel J.L., Schwartz C., Florentin L. Urban soils. Encyclopedia Soils Environ. 2005, 202-208.
16. Nehls T., Rokia S., Mekiffer B., Schwartz C., Wessolek G. Contribution of bricks to urban soil properties. J. Soils Sediments. 2013, 13(3):575-584.
17. Nielsen T.S., Hansen K.B. Do green areas affect health? results from Danish survey on the use of green areas and health indicators. Health Place 2007, 13(4):839-850.
18. Paute J.L., Marignier J., Vidal B. Le triaxial à changements répétés LPC pour l'étude des graves non traitées. Bulletin de liaison des Laboratoires des Ponts et Chaussées 1994, 190:19-26.
19. Séré G., Schwartz C., Ouvrard S., Sauvage C., Renat J.C., Morel J.L. Soil construction: a step for ecological reclamation of derelict lands. J. Soils Sediments 2008, 8:130-136.
20. Séré G., Schwartz C., Ouvrard S., Renat J.C., Watteau F., Villemin G., Morel J.L. Early pedogenic evolution of constructed Technosols. J. Soils Sediments 2010, 10(7):1246-1254.
21. Severson B.L., Snurr R.Q., Ottino J.M. Granular mixtures: analogy with chemical solution thermodynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127:174902.
22. Singh R.P., Agrawal M. Potential benefits and risks of land application of sewage sludge. Waste Manage. 2008, 28(2):347-358.
23. IUSS Working Group WRB. 2006. World Reference Base for soil resources 2006. second ed. World Soil Resources Reports No. 103. FAO, Rome.
24. Wright A.L., Provin T.L., Hons F.M., Zuberer D.A., White R.H. Compost impacts on dissolved organic carbon and available nitrogen and phosphorus in turfgrass soil. Waste Manage. 2008, 28(6):1057-1063.