The relevant scales of ecosystem services demand

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 10, Issue , 2014, Pages 49-51

  Geijzendorffer, I R ^a   Roche, P K ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UR EMAX   (France)

Author keywords

Assessments; Benefit; Institutions; Mapping; Spatial; Stakeholders

Indexed keywords

EID: 84907707769     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.09.002     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Burkhard B., Kandziora M., Hou Y., Müller F. Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands - concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landsc. Online 2014, 34:1-32. 10.3097/LO.201434.
2. Burkhard B., Kroll F., Nedkov S., Müller F. Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:17-29.
3. Costanza R. Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:350-352.
4. Geijzendorffer I.R., Roche P.K. Can biodiversity monitoring schemes provide indicators for ecosystem services?. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 33:148-157.
5. Hein L., Van Koppen K., De Groot R.S., Ekko C., Van Ierland E.C. Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 57:209-228.
6. Maes J., Egoh B., Willemen L., Liquete C., Vihervaara P., Schägner J.P., Grizzzti B., Drakou E.G., La Notte A., Zulian G., Bouraoui F., Paracchini M.L., Braat L., Bidoglio G. Mapping ecosystem services for policy support and decision making in the European Union. Ecosyst. Serv. 2012, 1(1):31-39.
7. Reyeres B., Biggs R., Cumming G.S., Elmqvist T., Hejnowicz A.P., Polasky S. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: a social-ecological approach. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2013, 11(5):268-273. 10.1890/120144.
8. Scholes R.J., Reyers B., Biggs R., Spierenburg M.J., Duriappah A. Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social-ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2013, 5:16-25.
9. Schröter M., Barton D.N., Remme R.P., Hein L. Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol. Indic. 2014, 36:539-551.
10. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636.
11. Syrbe R.-U., Walz U. Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 2012, 21:80-88.
12. Villamagna A.M., Angermeier P.L., Bennett E. Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complex. 2013, 15:114-121.